On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 17:37 +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 11:14:45AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > On Sat, 2005-06-04 at 13:51 +0200, Johannes Rohr wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I am surprised by the package description which says:
> > >
> > > Note that these patches do NOT apply
On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 11:14:45AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-06-04 at 13:51 +0200, Johannes Rohr wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am surprised by the package description which says:
> >
> > Note that these patches do NOT apply
> > against a pristine Linux 2.6.11 kernel but only against
On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 09:19:58PM +0200, Johannes Rohr wrote:
> Am Samstag, den 04.06.2005, 11:14 -0600 schrieb dann frazier:
>
> [...]
>
> > They contain the differences between the
> > kernel-source-2.6.11_2.6.11.orig.tar.gz and Debian's kernel sources. The
> > important point here is that ker
Am Samstag, den 04.06.2005, 11:14 -0600 schrieb dann frazier:
[...]
> They contain the differences between the
> kernel-source-2.6.11_2.6.11.orig.tar.gz and Debian's kernel sources. The
> important point here is that kernel-source-2.6.11_2.6.11.orig.tar.gz is
> not the same as linux-2.6.11.tar.gz
On Sat, 2005-06-04 at 13:51 +0200, Johannes Rohr wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am surprised by the package description which says:
>
> Note that these patches do NOT apply
> against a pristine Linux 2.6.11 kernel but only against
> kernel-source-2.6.11_2.6.11.orig.tar.gz from the Debian archive.
>
> In
Package: kernel-patch-debian-2.6.11
Version: 2.6.11-5
Severity: normal
Hi,
I am surprised by the package description which says:
Note that these patches do NOT apply
against a pristine Linux 2.6.11 kernel but only against
kernel-source-2.6.11_2.6.11.orig.tar.gz from the Debian archive.
In fa
6 matches
Mail list logo