On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 02:59:05PM +0100, George B. wrote:
On 8/19/05, Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 01:05:10PM +0100, George B. wrote:
On 8/18/05, Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, it should do just that.
Sorry, which one? Automatically use
On 8/19/05, Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 01:05:10PM +0100, George B. wrote:
On 8/18/05, Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, it should do just that.
Sorry, which one? Automatically use gcc-3.3, or default to gcc-4.0?
Sorry for being unclear. If you build
On 8/18/05, Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, it should do just that.
Sorry, which one? Automatically use gcc-3.3, or default to gcc-4.0?
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 01:05:10PM +0100, George B. wrote:
On 8/18/05, Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, it should do just that.
Sorry, which one? Automatically use gcc-3.3, or default to gcc-4.0?
Sorry for being unclear. If you build kernel-source-2.4.27 2.4.27-11
then it should use
Package: kernel-source-2.4.27
Version: 2.4.27-10
Severity: important
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Hello,
Submitting as promised in #31763.
The package depends on non-specific gcc. This is now gcc 4.0 by default.
As discussed in #317637, build will fail unless gcc 3.2 is
George B. wrote:
Package: kernel-source-2.4.27
Version: 2.4.27-10
Severity: important
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Hello,
Submitting as promised in #31763.
The package depends on non-specific gcc. This is now gcc 4.0 by default.
As discussed in #317637, build
On 8/17/05, Thiemo Seufer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The 2.4.27-11 uploaded today depends on gcc-3.3 and should solve that
problem. (It is not yet installed in the archive but available from
http://packages.vergenet.net/pending/ )
:-)
Will it automatically use gcc-3.3 when compiling? With me
7 matches
Mail list logo