I've gotten confirmation that yes, applying this patch just exposes the next
error about relocations. So there's no particular hurry on applying this
when it doesn't actually fix the modules in question.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian
I've also received private requests for this bug to be fixed, so I looked
into it a bit.
Unfortunately, that patch doesn't really help:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2006/12/msg00565.html
Digging around a bit shows
http://lists.debian.org/debian-alpha/2006/12/msg00030.html as the
* Steve Langasek wrote:
[...]
Norbert, do you have any further thoughts on this?
It's still on my radar, I hope to find some time to take a closer look
at it next weekend.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
* Andras HORVATH wrote:
linux-image-2.6.18-4-alpha-smp still suffers from Could not
allocate X bytes percpu data when loading modules (for example,
xfs, eepro100 and e100).
I've found this discussion (regarding the previous version,
linux-image-2.6.18-3-alpha-smp):
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-4-alpha-smp
Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-10
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hello,
linux-image-2.6.18-4-alpha-smp still suffers from Could not allocate X
bytes percpu data when loading modules (for example, xfs, eepro100 and
e100).
I've found this discussion (regarding the
5 matches
Mail list logo