On Thu, 03 Apr 2008, maximilian attems wrote:
On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 07:35:38AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
A post on lkml today [1] by one of the people working on it makes clear
that
the new firewire stack will not get into shape in time for lenny.
the third fedora release happens with
[ dropping release cc ]
On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 07:35:38AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
A post on lkml today [1] by one of the people working on it makes clear that
the new firewire stack will not get into shape in time for lenny.
the third fedora release happens with juju firewire stack only.
A post on lkml today [1] by one of the people working on it makes clear that
the new firewire stack will not get into shape in time for lenny.
At the same time, there is quite a big demand from users for the old stack
because there hardware is not supported by the new one. Some of the
relevant
On 29/07/07 10:50, maximilian attems wrote:
please file aboves report in bugzilla.kernel.org
and inform us of your bug nr.
Done, see:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8828
Thanks,
-- Mourad DC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 05:19:53AM +0200, Mourad De Clerck wrote:
After upgrading to 2.6.22, my firewire controller just stopped working
altogether. It had been working perfectly in all previous versions. I was
looking to manually load the old stack/sbp2 modules, but I see you chose
not to
Package: linux-image-2.6.22-1-k7
Version: 2.6.22-2
Severity: important
After upgrading to 2.6.22, my firewire controller just stopped working
altogether. It had been working perfectly in all previous versions. I was
looking to manually load the old stack/sbp2 modules, but I see you chose
not to
6 matches
Mail list logo
