Bug#436260: closed by maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Re: linux-support-2.6.22-1: Support for exernal module packages broken)

2008-06-30 Thread Mark Brown
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 11:01:43PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: there was no patch provided nor any proof of any trouble by your side, so tagging with moreinfo and willl close in 10 days unless something substantial comes up. Uh, message 10 of the bug report contains the updated version of

Bug#436260: closed by maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Re: linux-support-2.6.22-1: Support for exernal module packages broken)

2008-06-30 Thread maximilian attems
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008, Mark Brown wrote: On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 11:01:43PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: there was no patch provided nor any proof of any trouble by your side, so tagging with moreinfo and willl close in 10 days unless something substantial comes up. Uh, message 10 of

Processed: Re: Bug#436260 closed by maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Re: linux-support-2.6.22-1: Support for exernal module packages broken)

2008-06-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 436260 Bug#436260: linux-support-2.6.22-1: Support for exernal module packages broken Bug reopened, originator not changed. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#436260: closed by maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Re: linux-support-2.6.22-1: Support for exernal module packages broken)

2008-06-29 Thread Mark Brown
reopen 436260 thanks On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 03:48:07PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: closing as this general assumption seems not true quite a bunch of external modules is build. As far as I remember (this was all quite some time ago) the external module packages were all using

Bug#436260: closed by maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Re: linux-support-2.6.22-1: Support for exernal module packages broken)

2008-06-29 Thread maximilian attems
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 08:42:11PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: As far as I remember (this was all quite some time ago) the external module packages were all using forked copies of this code; IIRC the patch I have provided largely merged these in. hmm reopening a but on a wrong fact. i strongly