On Mon, 04 May 2009 00:55:55 +0100
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 01:35 +0200, Antonio Ospite wrote:
On Mon, 04 May 2009 00:17:03 +0100
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
...
Anyway, here's my proposed patch for unstable (against 2.6.30-rc4) that
On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 08:21 +0300, Kalle Olavi Niemitalo wrote:
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk writes:
- Remove Modified on... lines; that's what the commit message is for
Those were the prominent notices mentioned in GPLv2 2. a).
Right, I see. I believe the Debian patch system makes
On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 21:45 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 11:01:09AM +0200, Antonio Ospite wrote:
Hi,
I just wonder if there is any update on this one and if the split-out
patch has been proposed to upstream yet.
If you manage to get this upstream, with Linus
On Mon, 04 May 2009 00:17:03 +0100
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 21:45 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
Kalle: would you mind submitting your patch upstream, if you haven't
already? A lot of similar patches for other drives have been accepted
in recent
On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 01:35 +0200, Antonio Ospite wrote:
On Mon, 04 May 2009 00:17:03 +0100
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 21:45 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
Kalle: would you mind submitting your patch upstream, if you haven't
already? A lot of
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk writes:
- Remove Modified on... lines; that's what the commit message is for
Those were the prominent notices mentioned in GPLv2 2. a).
pgpGEfIUch6fL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Antonio Ospite osp...@studenti.unina.it writes:
can the latest version of your code be found in this thread?
Yes, the version I posted on 2008-04-06 is the latest one. When
building a local linux-2.6 2.6.26-9.kon.1 version, I put the
patch at debian/patches/debian/dfsg/sound-pci-cs46xx.patch
On Fri, 01 May 2009 11:16:58 +0300
Kalle Olavi Niemitalo k...@iki.fi wrote:
Antonio Ospite osp...@studenti.unina.it writes:
can the latest version of your code be found in this thread?
Yes, the version I posted on 2008-04-06 is the latest one. When
building a local linux-2.6
Antonio Ospite osp...@studenti.unina.it writes:
About the SND_CS46XX_NEW_DSP issue, from a first glance to
the driver it looks like that in order to support it we have to make a
binary image for any file in the imgs/ dir. Does this look ok to you?
I guess that's what needs to be done. The
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 22:58:15 +0300
Kalle Olavi Niemitalo k...@iki.fi wrote:
dann frazier da...@debian.org writes:
Kalle: would you mind submitting your patch upstream, if you haven't
already? A lot of similar patches for other drives have been accepted
in recent months.
I expect the
dann frazier da...@debian.org writes:
Kalle: would you mind submitting your patch upstream, if you haven't
already? A lot of similar patches for other drives have been accepted
in recent months.
I expect the patch would be rejected because it breaks
SND_CS46XX_NEW_DSP. Do you think
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 11:01:09AM +0200, Antonio Ospite wrote:
Hi,
I just wonder if there is any update on this one and if the split-out
patch has been proposed to upstream yet.
If you manage to get this upstream, with Linus keeping on distributing
the binary images, debian can well
Hi,
I just wonder if there is any update on this one and if the split-out
patch has been proposed to upstream yet.
If you manage to get this upstream, with Linus keeping on distributing
the binary images, debian can well choose not to distribute them, but
debian users can still get the blob
13 matches
Mail list logo
