On Mon, 2011-08-15 at 00:48 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Hi,
Jonathan Nieder wrote:
I wonder how this should be dealt with wrt squeeze.
For your amusement, here's an ugly proof-of-concept patch (against
2.6.32.y) that just does unaligned reads from struct taskstats. The
only
Hi,
Jonathan Nieder wrote:
I wonder how this should be dealt with wrt squeeze.
For your amusement, here's an ugly proof-of-concept patch (against
2.6.32.y) that just does unaligned reads from struct taskstats. The
only redeeming feature is that it doesn't break ABI. I'd be curious
to hear
Paul Wise wrote:
I tried to backport the iotop fixes to 0.4 but there were some merge
conflicts so I abandoned that effort for now.
(Applying a7334ca3 (Removing dead code) along with 08211d20 and
7f1773e7 seems to do it fwiw.)
If you use a newer kernel than squeeze, you should use backports
tags 536860 = upstream fixed-upstream
quit
Hi,
Gabriel VLASIU wrote:
Running iotop I get lots of:
Kernel unaligned access at TPC[48bef4] __delayacct_add_tsk+0x2c/0x15c
I suspect this was fixed by v2.6.38-rc1~296 (taskstats: use better
ifdef for alignment, 2011-01-12). Could you test a
Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Could you test a recent kernel
from sid or experimental, or try the following patch?
[...]
taskstats: use better ifdef for alignment
The following changes would need to be applied first for it to work,
of course.
commit 85893120
Author: Jeff Mahoney je...@suse.com
Package: linux-image-2.6.26-2-sparc64
Version: 2.6.26-17
Severity: important
Running iotop I get lots of:
Jul 14 09:44:30 mailq kernel: [1285719.964489] Kernel unaligned access at
TPC[48bef4] __delayacct_add_tsk+0x2c/0x15c
Jul 14 09:44:30 mailq kernel: [1285719.964558] Kernel unaligned access
6 matches
Mail list logo
