Bug#543398: linux-image-2.6.30-1-686: e100 is missing a dependency on linux-firmware

2009-08-24 Thread Jon Thackray
Package: linux-image-2.6.30-1-686 Version: 2.6.30-5 Severity: important In the 2.6.30 kernel, but not in 2.6.26, e100 depends on d101m_ucode.bin, from firmware-linux. The kernel package is not marked as depending on this. Consequently, if you reboot into your newly installed 2.6.30 kernel, your

Bug#543398: linux-image-2.6.30-1-686: e100 is missing a dependency on linux-firmware

2009-08-24 Thread dann frazier
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 07:24:28PM +0100, Jon Thackray wrote: Package: linux-image-2.6.30-1-686 Version: 2.6.30-5 Severity: important In the 2.6.30 kernel, but not in 2.6.26, e100 depends on d101m_ucode.bin, from firmware-linux. The kernel package is not marked as depending on this.

Bug#543398: linux-image-2.6.30-1-686: e100 is missing a dependency on linux-firmware

2009-08-24 Thread Jon Thackray
Well, it seems a shame to have gone from a situation where the system worked to one where it doesn't. If you must do this, you should at least force the user to interact with the upgrade process (ie it won't proceed until the user makes a decision (cf the pam package for example), either to

Bug#543398: linux-image-2.6.30-1-686: e100 is missing a dependency on linux-firmware

2009-08-24 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, 2009-08-24 at 21:02 +0100, Jon Thackray wrote: Well, it seems a shame to have gone from a situation where the system worked to one where it doesn't. If you must do this, you should at least force the user to interact with the upgrade process (ie it won't proceed until the user makes