On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 07:08:47AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 06:22:47PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
could you please review belows patch.
if you see no objection, I'd just merge it.
i finally got around
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 12:13:52AM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 07:08:47AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
i finally got around to testing the proposed patch (after
adjusting slightly for newer version). seems to
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 06:22:47PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
could you please review belows patch.
if you see no objection, I'd just merge it.
i finally got around to testing the proposed patch (after adjusting slightly
for newer version). seems to work fine with 0.94.4.
i'd probably
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 06:22:47PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
could you please review belows patch.
if you see no objection, I'd just merge it.
i finally got around to testing the proposed patch (after adjusting slightly
for newer
hello vagrant,
could you please review belows patch.
if you see no objection, I'd just merge it.
thanks maks
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010, Tim Small wrote:
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.93.4
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
/usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/functions attempts to follow the
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.93.4
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
/usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/functions attempts to follow the
semantics described in Documentation/filesystems/nfs/nfsroot.txt with
respect to IP autoconfiguration, however a significant departure from
the behaviour is
6 matches
Mail list logo
