On Tuesday 13 Jul 2010 00:22:01 Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
I applied the 3 patches and tested the kernel. Test results look good.
Have not been able to reproduce the bug.
Sorry. It hit back again.
[76572.837634] TOMOYO-WARNING: Domain 'kernel /etc/init.d/kdm
/sbin/start-stop-daemon
On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 03:43 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
On Tuesday 13 Jul 2010 00:22:01 Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
I applied the 3 patches and tested the kernel. Test results look good.
Have not been able to reproduce the bug.
Sorry. It hit back again.
[76572.837634]
On Monday 12 Jul 2010 02:05:59 Ben Hutchings wrote:
Please apply those patches and re-test...
Which patches ?
These ones.
I applied the 3 patches and tested the kernel. Test results look good. Have
not been able to reproduce the bug.
Thanks,
Ritesh
--
Ritesh Raj Sarraf |
On Sun, 2010-07-11 at 23:42 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
On Thursday 20 May 2010 00:10:52 maximilian attems wrote:
yep but without the iwlwifi patches, i have still to add
f82a924cc88a5541df1d4b9d38a0968cd077a051 on top of the two patches.
currently moving around so most likely will
On Monday 12 Jul 2010 00:17:41 Ben Hutchings wrote:
It was triggered again while running `git fsck` on linux tree. Bad part
is, the wifi device went offline. Not even a driver reload helped. Had
to reboot the laptop. dmesg is attached.
Please apply those patches and re-test...
Which
On Tuesday 18 May 2010 11:21:10 Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
Hello Ben,
On Sunday 16 May 2010 01:18:36 Ben Hutchings wrote:
[29747.217066] iwlagn :03:00.0: Failed to allocate SKB buffer with
GFP_ATOMIC. Only 1 free buffers remaining.
[...]
You are not testing the right kernel
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 11:56:34PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
On Tuesday 18 May 2010 11:21:10 Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
Hello Ben,
On Sunday 16 May 2010 01:18:36 Ben Hutchings wrote:
[29747.217066] iwlagn :03:00.0: Failed to allocate SKB buffer with
GFP_ATOMIC. Only 1 free
Hello Ben,
On Sunday 16 May 2010 01:18:36 Ben Hutchings wrote:
[29747.217066] iwlagn :03:00.0: Failed to allocate SKB buffer with
GFP_ATOMIC. Only 1 free buffers remaining.
[...]
You are not testing the right kernel version. This error message was
removed by the first patch Max
On Sat, 2010-05-15 at 00:05 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
On Friday 14 May 2010 23:00:51 maximilian attems wrote:
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 09:15:37PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
thanks, not yet boot test, need to finish something.
Triggered again after 2 suspend cycles.
On Friday 14 May 2010 06:42:27 maximilian attems wrote:
dropped the fedora iwlwifi patch queue, this time it's just
current repo + 2 page Rx patches, checked that they applied:
(+) OK bugfix/all/0001-iwlwifi-use-paged-Rx.patch
(+) OK
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 09:15:37PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
thanks, not yet boot test, need to finish something.
Triggered again after 2 suspend cycles.
grr, can you repost the first appearance of it.
thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 12:05:19AM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
On Friday 14 May 2010 23:00:51 maximilian attems wrote:
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 09:15:37PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
thanks, not yet boot test, need to finish something.
Triggered again after 2 suspend cycles.
dropped the fedora iwlwifi patch queue, this time it's just
current repo + 2 page Rx patches, checked that they applied:
(+) OK bugfix/all/0001-iwlwifi-use-paged-Rx.patch
(+) OK bugfix/all/0001-iwlwifi-fix-AMSDU-Rx-after-paged-Rx-patch.patch
-- 13 fully applied.
please test this
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 15:47 +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 02:09:06PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
On Tuesday 11 May 2010 12:32:45 Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
Thanks Max. Am currently testing it. Will report results in a day or two.
The bug got triggered in the
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 03:37:00AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
I think you've done something wrong in building that kernel. This patch
removes padding of the RX buffers so that they are order-1 rather than
order-2 (or on the 3945, order-0 rather than order-1). I don't see any
way you could
On Monday 10 May 2010 23:19:42 maximilian attems wrote:
backported both on top of fedora iwlwifi linux-2.6 upstream merged
patches, test build is at:
http://charm.itp.tuwien.ac.at/~mattems/linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64_2.6.32-13_amd64.deb
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 02:09:06PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
On Tuesday 11 May 2010 12:32:45 Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
Thanks Max. Am currently testing it. Will report results in a day or two.
The bug got triggered in the very first run. Does not look fixed. dmesg
attached.
yes zut,
On Thu, 06 May 2010, Ben Hutchings wrote:
tag 580124 fixed-upstream
thanks
This should be fixed by the following upstream changes included in Linux
2.6.33:
commit 2f301227a1ede57504694e1f64839839f5737cac
Author: Zhu Yi yi@intel.com
Date: Fri Oct 9 17:19:45 2009 +0800
On Thursday 06 May 2010 07:16:01 Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Mon, 2010-05-03 at 23:58 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-11
Severity: normal
I often keep getting this allocation failure message. My gut feel is
that it gets triggered when I do some I/O.
On Sunday 09 May 2010 21:38:25 Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
On Thursday 06 May 2010 07:16:01 Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Mon, 2010-05-03 at 23:58 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-11
Severity: normal
I often keep getting this allocation failure message.
On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 10:16:55PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
All these messages (this one and the previous one with iwlwifi) get triggered
only when there is heavy I/O activity.
I don't think this bug is related to iwlwifi. What do you think ?
it is, can trigger it easily on x61s,
On Mon, 2010-05-03 at 23:58 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-11
Severity: normal
I often keep getting this allocation failure message. My gut feel is
that it gets triggered when I do some I/O. Today, it got triggered when
I was copying a couple of Gig data
tag 580124 fixed-upstream
thanks
This should be fixed by the following upstream changes included in Linux
2.6.33:
commit 2f301227a1ede57504694e1f64839839f5737cac
Author: Zhu Yi yi@intel.com
Date: Fri Oct 9 17:19:45 2009 +0800
iwlwifi: use paged Rx
commit
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tag 580124 fixed-upstream
Bug #580124 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-4-amd64: kernel allocation failure
in iwl_rx_allocate
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
580124:
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-11
Severity: normal
I often keep getting this allocation failure message. My gut feel is
that it gets triggered when I do some I/O. Today, it got triggered when
I was copying a couple of Gig data from my local encrypted backup
partition to an external USB disk.
25 matches
Mail list logo
