On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 09:05:55AM +0900, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thanks for the info. I've checked the dash and bash manual pages but
running under errexit seems to be the same as using `set -e`. The hook
provided by iscan has done a `set -e`
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2010年06月29日 18:33, maximilian attems wrote:
FTR, I've attached the hook scripts template. The @...@ stuff is
substituted at package build time.
hmm I don'T see at a quick look why it failed.
but I don't get it'S purpose?
why do you want
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Image Scan! for Linux upstream maintainer here.
Care to point out why iscan is the culprit? I went through the logs but
nothing ran a bell.
If possible we'd like to get a fix out before squeeze goes stable ;-)
- --
Olaf Meeuwissen, LPIC-2
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 05:16:40PM +0900, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Image Scan! for Linux upstream maintainer here.
Care to point out why iscan is the culprit? I went through the logs but
nothing ran a bell.
you are sending the message to the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2010年06月28日 17:31, maximilian attems wrote:
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 05:16:40PM +0900, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Image Scan! for Linux upstream maintainer here.
Care to point out why iscan is the
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 08:02:03AM +0900, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2010???06???28??? 17:31, maximilian attems wrote:
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 05:16:40PM +0900, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Image
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2010?06?29? 07:55, maximilian attems wrote:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 08:02:03AM +0900, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2010???06???28??? 17:31, maximilian attems wrote:
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 05:16:40PM
tags 586554 + moreinfo
thanks
* drb thebickh...@ntlworld.com [Sun Jun 20, 2010 at 03:42:34PM +0100]:
Unpacking replacement initramfs-tools ...
Processing triggers for man-db ...
Setting up initramfs-tools (0.97) ...
Installing new version of config file /etc/initramfs-tools/update-
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 586554 + moreinfo
Bug #586554 [initramfs-tools] initramfs-tools fails to upgrade from 0.96.1 to
0.97
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
586554:
* thebickhams thebickh...@ntlworld.com [Mon Jun 21, 2010 at 08:51:00AM +0100]:
The output is as follows :
# sh -x /var/lib/dpkg/info/initramfs-tools.postinst
+ set -e
+ [ ! -e /etc/initramfs-tools/modules ]
+ [ x != xtriggered ]
+ dpkg --compare-versions ge 1.14.5ubuntu10~~
+
* thebickhams thebickh...@ntlworld.com [Mon Jun 21, 2010 at 11:35:52AM +0100]:
On 06/21/2010 11:17 AM, Michael Prokop wrote:
sh -x /usr/sbin/update-initramfs -u 1/tmp/update-initramfs.log 21
Running as root (not sudo), log file attached.
+ STATEDIR=/var/lib/initramfs-tools
[...]
+ return 0
* thebickhams thebickh...@ntlworld.com [Mon Jun 21, 2010 at 12:11:12PM +0100]:
Still won't update. I note three other people have reported the issue in
the sidux forums; both 32bit and 64bit.
Please provide output of:
apt-get --download-only --reinstall --print-uris install
Hi Michael,
Still won't update. I note three other people have reported the issue in
the sidux forums; both 32bit and 64bit.
Best regards,
Dai
The following packages will be upgraded:
initramfs-tools
1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 3 not upgraded.
Need to get 0B/84.9kB of
* Michael Prokop m...@debian.org [Mon Jun 21, 2010 at 01:22:01PM +0200]:
* thebickhams thebickh...@ntlworld.com [Mon Jun 21, 2010 at 12:11:12PM
+0100]:
Still won't update. I note three other people have reported the issue in
the sidux forums; both 32bit and 64bit.
Please provide output
* maximilian attems m...@stro.at [Tue Jun 22, 2010 at 12:06:00AM +0200]:
your first report shows clearly an mkinitramfs failure,
currently we don't know where to trace it.
While discussing this with maks we also noticed that this could be
caused by a problem in a hook script shipped with
hello,
On Mon, 21 Jun 2010, thebickhams wrote:
log file as attachment
from a quick look at this looks like an older mkinitramfs,
we'd need belows output from the one that fails to install:
sh -x /usr/sbin/mkinitramfs -o
/boot/initrd.img-2.6.34-0.slh.9-sidux-amd64.new
find /usr/share/initramfs-tools
/usr/share/initramfs-tools
/usr/share/initramfs-tools/modules
/usr/share/initramfs-tools/conf-hooks.d
/usr/share/initramfs-tools/hooks
/usr/share/initramfs-tools/hooks/klibc
/usr/share/initramfs-tools/hooks/iscan
/usr/share/initramfs-tools/hooks/busybox
tags 586554 - moreinfo
tags 586554 + pending
thanks
* thebickhams thebickh...@ntlworld.com [Tue Jun 22, 2010 at 12:03:29AM +0100]:
[...]
find /usr/share/initramfs-tools -print0 | xargs -0 dpkg -S
iscan, initramfs-tools, udev, dmsetup: /usr/share/initramfs-tools
iscan:
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.94.4
Severity: important
Unpacking replacement initramfs-tools ...
Processing triggers for man-db ...
Setting up initramfs-tools (0.97) ...
Installing new version of config file /etc/initramfs-tools/update-
initramfs.conf ...
Installing new version of config
19 matches
Mail list logo
