Bug#594561: State of the bug 594561

2011-01-02 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sun, 2010-12-26 at 15:42 +0100, Wenceslao González-Viñas wrote: > Ok!, I did more or less the things you told me. I was not able to > patch the source in a standard way; but I changed the source code by > hand, I recompile the kernel and I used the resulting module with > insmod rt2870.ko

Bug#594561: State of the bug 594561

2010-12-26 Thread Wenceslao González-Viñas
Ok!, I did more or less the things you told me. I was not able to patch the source in a standard way; but I changed the source code by hand, I recompile the kernel and I used the resulting module with insmod rt2870.ko ieee80211_regdom=EU Please note that I did not reinstall compiled kernel

Bug#594561: State of the bug 594561

2010-12-25 Thread Wenceslao González-Viñas
Ok! I didn't understand this in your last email (I thought it was two step thing and the first was what I did). It does not seem easy. I will try and say ... Thanks, Wenceslao Ben Hutchings ha escrito: On Thu, 2010-12-23 at 16:33 +0100, Wenceslao González-Viñas wrote: I patched same fi

Bug#594561: State of the bug 594561

2010-12-24 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Thu, 2010-12-23 at 16:33 +0100, Wenceslao González-Viñas wrote: > I patched same file as before and i get the following error. I attach > original and rejection file.. > > patch rt2870sta.ko > 0001-rt28x0-Add-ieee80211_regdom-module-parameter-mimicki.patch [...] Why are you trying to pat

Bug#594561: State of the bug 594561

2010-12-05 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 07:59 +0100, Wenceslao González-Viñas wrote: > Hereby I attach new output, OK, so: > [ 8696.512789] Block 0:3070 0130 0101 0001 > [ 8696.515285] Block 0:2200 2d22 a72d 00a7 > [ 8696.517785] Block 1:ddfb 00dd > [ 8696.520411] Block 1: > [ 8696

Bug#594561: State of the bug 594561

2010-11-28 Thread Wenceslao González-Viñas
Hereby I attach new output, Wenceslao Ben Hutchings ha escrito: On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 22:38 +0100, Wenceslao González-Viñas wrote: Here it is the output of dmesg (attached). Sorry, but there's something I missed - there are two different ways of reading the ROM. I have put yet another

Bug#594561: State of the bug 594561

2010-11-28 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 22:38 +0100, Wenceslao González-Viñas wrote: > Here it is the output of dmesg (attached). Sorry, but there's something I missed - there are two different ways of reading the ROM. I have put yet another version at the same URL, which will read the ROM in the other way. Pleas

Bug#594561: State of the bug 594561

2010-11-28 Thread Wenceslao González-Viñas
Here it is the output of dmesg (attached). Best, Wenceslao Ben Hutchings ha escrito: On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 21:20 +0100, Wenceslao González-Viñas wrote: Dear Ben, Module crc_ccitt was already loaded. (anyway I removed and loaded again). After insmod rt2870sta it gave same error and kern.

Bug#594561: State of the bug 594561

2010-11-28 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 21:20 +0100, Wenceslao González-Viñas wrote: > Dear Ben, > > Module crc_ccitt was already loaded. (anyway I removed and loaded again). > > After insmod rt2870sta it gave same error and kern.log gave: > > rt2870sta: module has no symbols (stripped?) Sorry, I ran 'strip' on

Bug#594561: State of the bug 594561

2010-11-28 Thread Wenceslao González-Viñas
Dear Ben, Module crc_ccitt was already loaded. (anyway I removed and loaded again). After insmod rt2870sta it gave same error and kern.log gave: rt2870sta: module has no symbols (stripped?) Thanks and sorry not to cc to bug error address in previous email. Best, Wenceslao Ben Hutchings h

Bug#594561: State of the bug 594561

2010-11-28 Thread Ben Hutchings
[Please remember to reply-to-all, including the bug address.] On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 10:42 +0100, Wenceslao González-Viñas wrote: > Dear Ben, > > thank you very much! In fact there is some problem: > > It gives this error: > > insmod: error inserting 'rt2870sta.ko': -1 Invalid module format The

Bug#594561: State of the bug 594561

2010-11-27 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, 2010-11-24 at 22:29 +0100, Wenceslao González-Viñas wrote: > Could someone tell me what is the state of this bug? What can I do to > help to fix the problem? Well, you can prompt me to look again, as you did. :-) It seems that the code I changed, which looks like it sets the valid chann

Bug#594561: State of the bug 594561

2010-11-24 Thread Wenceslao González-Viñas
Could someone tell me what is the state of this bug? What can I do to help to fix the problem? Thank you very much in advanced, best regards, Wenceslao PS: I am using testing (squeeze) Este mensaje ha sido enviado desde https