On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 08:04, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> We should provide topology information to userland even if it's not
> very interesting. The current code appears to work properly for !SMP
> (tested on i386).
>
> Reference: http://bugs.debian.org/649216
> Reported-by: Marcus Osdoba
> Signed-
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 08:24:26AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 07:04:39AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > We should provide topology information to userland even if it's not
> > very interesting. The current code appears to work properly for !SMP
> > (tested on i386).
>
> Why,
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 07:04:39AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> We should provide topology information to userland even if it's not
> very interesting. The current code appears to work properly for !SMP
> (tested on i386).
Why, what will the topology look like for this?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
We should provide topology information to userland even if it's not
very interesting. The current code appears to work properly for !SMP
(tested on i386).
Reference: http://bugs.debian.org/649216
Reported-by: Marcus Osdoba
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings
---
drivers/base/Makefile |4 ++--
1 f
4 matches
Mail list logo