Bug#649216: [PATCH] topology: Provide CPU topology in sysfs in !SMP configurations

2012-01-03 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 08:04, Ben Hutchings wrote: > We should provide topology information to userland even if it's not > very interesting.  The current code appears to work properly for !SMP > (tested on i386). > > Reference: http://bugs.debian.org/649216 > Reported-by: Marcus Osdoba > Signed-

Bug#649216: [PATCH] topology: Provide CPU topology in sysfs in !SMP configurations

2011-11-24 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 08:24:26AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 07:04:39AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > We should provide topology information to userland even if it's not > > very interesting. The current code appears to work properly for !SMP > > (tested on i386). > > Why,

Bug#649216: [PATCH] topology: Provide CPU topology in sysfs in !SMP configurations

2011-11-24 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 07:04:39AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > We should provide topology information to userland even if it's not > very interesting. The current code appears to work properly for !SMP > (tested on i386). Why, what will the topology look like for this? thanks, greg k-h --

Bug#649216: [PATCH] topology: Provide CPU topology in sysfs in !SMP configurations

2011-11-23 Thread Ben Hutchings
We should provide topology information to userland even if it's not very interesting. The current code appears to work properly for !SMP (tested on i386). Reference: http://bugs.debian.org/649216 Reported-by: Marcus Osdoba Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings --- drivers/base/Makefile |4 ++-- 1 f