Hi
Thanks for this. Yes I think it would be good to fix this, and I think
we could convince the release team about it as well. I'll bring it up on
the kernel maintainers mailinglist. I'm not a kernel maintainer myself.
// Ola
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 07:37:29PM +0200, Christoph Lechleitner wrote:
Am 2012-07-10 19:12, schrieb Michael Renner:
> On Jul 10, 2012, at 17:25 , Christoph Lechleitner wrote:
>
>> Am 2012-07-10 16:58, schrieb Benjamin Henrion:
>>> I am affected by that bug, as updatedb crashes inside a VZ:
>>>
>>> Can someone fix that?
>>
>> Just to be sure, you did notice we from IT
On Jul 10, 2012, at 17:25 , Christoph Lechleitner wrote:
> Am 2012-07-10 16:58, schrieb Benjamin Henrion:
>> I am affected by that bug, as updatedb crashes inside a VZ:
>>
>> Can someone fix that?
>
> Just to be sure, you did notice we from ITEG are providing binary
> packages for now?
Thanks -
Am 2012-07-10 16:58, schrieb Benjamin Henrion:
> I am affected by that bug, as updatedb crashes inside a VZ:
>
> Can someone fix that?
Just to be sure, you did notice we from ITEG are providing binary
packages for now?
They are at
http://deb.clazzes.org/debian/pool/squeeze-contrib-1/
resp. ava
Michael Renner [120702]:
> On Jun 28, 2012, at 7:18 , Ola Lundqvist wrote:
>
> > I do not know if there is much point in that. We can do that of course
> > but as we soon have a new release without those kernels I do not
> > really see the benefit of doing so.
>
>
> As long as the Debian Squeez
On Jun 28, 2012, at 7:18 , Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> I do not know if there is much point in that. We can do that of course
> but as we soon have a new release without those kernels I do not
> really see the benefit of doing so.
As long as the Debian Squeeze kernels are actively maintained serious
Am 2012-06-30 13:24, schrieb Tim Small:
>
> Doesn't that look like dropping Debian+OpenVZ users in it a bit?
I totally agree.
> Suddenly they have to switch to a non-Debian kernel (or otherwise a
> completely different virtualisation technology) half way through a
> stable release with no notic
Hmm, I just re-read
http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/amd64/release-notes/ch-upgrading.en.html#deprecated
and it says "Debian GNU/Linux 6.0 will be the last release to include
Linux kernel virtualization featuresets outside of mainline. This means
that the OpenVZ and Linux-Vserver featuresets
Hi
vzctl and vzquota will still be supported. I will (very soon now)
upload a new version with instructions on how to install the .rpm
kernel and what to do there.
// Ola
Quoting Jonathan Nieder :
Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Thanks. Yes, but in this case the advice is to use the available
.rpm
Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Thanks. Yes, but in this case the advice is to use the available
> .rpm packages and alienize those to .deb.
Oh, dear. Shouldn't we add a NEWS file or something to let existing
users know the package in squeeze is not supported any more, then?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Hi Jonathan
Thanks. Yes, but in this case the advice is to use the available
.rpm packages and alienize those to .deb.
// Ola
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 12:24:44AM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Ola Lundqvist wrote:
>
> > I do not know if there is much point in that. We can do that of course
> >
Hi
I do not know if there is much point in that. We can do that of course
but as we soon have a new release without those kernels I do not
really see the benefit of doing so.
// Ola
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 05:53:21PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> tags 655385 + patch moreinfo
> quit
>
> Hi Ola
Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> I do not know if there is much point in that. We can do that of course
> but as we soon have a new release without those kernels I do not
> really see the benefit of doing so.
Squeeze still has at least a year of support left. But I'm trusting
your judgment about which ope
tags 655385 + patch moreinfo
quit
Hi Ola and Christoph,
Christoph Lechleitner wrote:
> There is a patch solving this problem:
> http://forum.openvz.org/index.php?t=msg&th=10493&goto=45496&#msg_45496
>
> Using this patch I was able to solve the problem for us.
Thanks!
Ola, should we apply this
14 matches
Mail list logo
