package linux-2.6
found 658764 3.2.19-1
thanks
I have installed ‘linux-image-3.2.0-2-amd64’ version 3.2.19-1 now that it
is in Wheezy, and confirmed the same behaviour.
--
\ “Never use a long word when there's a commensurate diminutive |
`\
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
package linux-2.6
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'linux-2.6'
Limit currently set to 'package':'linux-2.6'
found 658764 3.2.19-1
Bug #658764 [linux-2.6] linux-image-3.1.0-1-amd64: free ATI driver corrupts
output
package linux-2.6
found 658764 3.2.14-1
thanks
I have installed ‘linux-image-3.2.0-2-amd64’ version 3.2.14-1 now that it
is in Wheezy, and confirmed the same behaviour.
--
\“That's the essence of science: Ask an impertinent question, |
`\and you're on the way to the
package linux-2.6
found 658764 3.2.9-1
thanks
I have installed ‘linux-image-3.2.0-2-amd64’ version 3.2.9-1 now that it is
in Wheezy, and confirmed the same behaviour.
Is the range of version information enough now to narrow down the source of
the problem? What can I do to help you get this
package linux-2.6
found 658764 3.2.6-1
thanks
I have installed ‘linux-image-3.2.0-1-amd64’ version 3.2.6-1 now that it is
in Wheezy, and confirmed the same behaviour.
--
\ “First things first, but not necessarily in that order.” —The |
`\
On 06-Feb-2012, Ben Finney wrote:
On 05-Feb-2012, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Can you bisect?
I'll try to do so.
Even a few tests of versions halfway between from
http://snapshot.debian.org/ can help a lot in narrowing down the cause
of this particular regression.
Okay. Which dates
Ben Finney wrote:
On 05-Feb-2012, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Can you bisect?
[...]
I'm confused by what you want me to do. The page at
URL:http://snapshot.debian.org/binary/linux-image-2.6-amd64/ lists many
packages, and I don't really know how to satisfy the dependencies of what I
download
On 26-Feb-2012, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Easier to work from http://snapshot.debian.org/package/linux-2.6/.
Okay. So which package versions are of particular interest to test?
--
\ “Everything is futile.” —Marvin of Borg |
`\
Ben Finney wrote:
On 26-Feb-2012, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Easier to work from http://snapshot.debian.org/package/linux-2.6/.
Okay. So which package versions are of particular interest to test?
If bisecting? The version halfway between the newest known-good and oldest
known-bad version.
--
package linux-2.6
found 658764 2.6.38-3
thanks
On 06-Feb-2012, Ben Finney wrote:
On 05-Feb-2012, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Can you bisect?
I'll try to do so.
Even a few tests of versions halfway between from
http://snapshot.debian.org/ can help a lot in narrowing down the cause
of this
package src:linux-2.6
found 658764 3.1.8-2
found 658764 3.2.4-1
thanks
On 05-Feb-2012, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Does this happen with version 3.2.4-1 from sid, too?
I'm confused about which version to get; the names are weird:
Unpacking linux-image-3.2.0-1-amd64 (from
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 10:50:37PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
package src:linux-2.6
found 658764 3.1.8-2
found 658764 3.2.4-1
thanks
On 05-Feb-2012, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Does this happen with version 3.2.4-1 from sid, too?
I'm confused about which version to get; the names are weird:
Hi Ben,
Ben Finney wrote:
On the same system, selecting Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (from the GRUB menu)
results in uncorrupted display also.
So the problem is restricted to Linux 3.1.0-1 on this system.
Does this happen with version 3.2.4-1 from sid, too? Can you bisect?
Even a few tests of
13 matches
Mail list logo
