Lukas Anzinger wrote:
> looks good to me.
Do you mean that the patch looks good or that you've tried applying it
and the behavior was bad before and good afterward?
(If you haven't tested it yet, here's a quick demo.
apt-get install git build-essential; # prerequisites
# if you don't alrea
Hi Jonathan,
looks good to me.
I've also reported this bug upstream under #42839.
Regards,
Lukas
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 19:36, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> tags 661696 = upstream patch moreinfo
> quit
>
> Hi Lukas,
>
> Lukas Anzinger wrote:
>
>> During a refactoring of the i915 driver a regressi
tags 661696 = upstream patch moreinfo
quit
Hi Lukas,
Lukas Anzinger wrote:
> During a refactoring of the i915 driver a regression has been introduced
> ([...]h=e70236a8d3d0a4c100a0b9f7d394d9bda9c56aca): For some chipsets
> the wrong fifo size is determined which results in lot's of pixel
> error
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-41
Severity: important
Tags: upstream patch
Hi,
I've encountered a nasty bug in the drm/i915 part of Debian's stable kernel.
The code is also present in 2.6.33.20, which is the latest stable upstream
release of 2.6.33.y at the time of writing.
During a refact
4 matches
Mail list logo
