Kubo Hiroshi writes:
> Hi.
>
>>> Do the functions 'i8xx_irq_handler' and 'queue_work_on' always appear in
>>> the call trace?
>>
>> I can't remember. If I encounter the problem again,
>> I will check it.
>
> After the last reply, I encountered the same problems twice.
> In the both problems, th
Hi.
>> Do the functions 'i8xx_irq_handler' and 'queue_work_on' always appear in
>> the call trace?
>
> I can't remember. If I encounter the problem again,
> I will check it.
After the last reply, I encountered the same problems twice.
In the both problems, the functions 'i8xx_irq_handler' and
Hi.
>> Control: severity -1 grave
>
> Sorry, no. This package works for most people, so it doesn't 'break the
> whole system'.
I see.
>> I haven't experience the same crash before the last update
>> of the linux-image package.
>
> Do the functions 'i8xx_irq_handler' and 'queue_work_on' always
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #700739 [src:linux] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
--
700739: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=700739
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.o
Control: severity -1 important
On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 23:37 +0900, Kubo Hiroshi wrote:
> Control: severity -1 grave
Sorry, no. This package works for most people, so it doesn't 'break the
whole system'.
> Hi dear,
>
> After I repoted the crash, I experienced the same crashes
> for serveral ti
Control: severity -1 grave
Hi dear,
After I repoted the crash, I experienced the same crashes
for serveral times on the same machine.
Most common situation is shutting down process,
but not limited to it.
I haven't experience the same crash before the last update
of the linux-image package.
6 matches
Mail list logo
