On Sun, 2013-12-08 at 23:40 +0100, Helge Deller wrote:
Hi Ben,
On 12/06/2013 04:01 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sun, 2013-09-08 at 22:26 +0200, Helge Deller wrote:
After the request to reduce the kernels to e.g. SMP-only, my thought was
to provide only 32bit-UP and 64bit SMP kernels.
To
Hi Ben,
On 12/06/2013 04:01 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sun, 2013-09-08 at 22:26 +0200, Helge Deller wrote:
After the request to reduce the kernels to e.g. SMP-only, my thought was
to provide only 32bit-UP and 64bit SMP kernels.
To be sure I asked on the parisc mailing list. The whole thread
On Sun, 2013-09-08 at 22:26 +0200, Helge Deller wrote:
On 09/08/2013 04:19 PM, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:53:58PM +0200, Helge Deller wrote:
On 08/28/2013 11:35 PM, Bastian Blank wrote:
Looks reasonable. But please send further changes to remove the
non-smp kernels.
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:53:58PM +0200, Helge Deller wrote:
On 08/28/2013 11:35 PM, Bastian Blank wrote:
Looks reasonable. But please send further changes to remove the
non-smp kernels.
I can do that. Do you have some background on this request for me?
Is it policy that you only want to
On Sun, 2013-09-08 at 16:19 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:53:58PM +0200, Helge Deller wrote:
On 08/28/2013 11:35 PM, Bastian Blank wrote:
Looks reasonable. But please send further changes to remove the
non-smp kernels.
I can do that. Do you have some background
On Sun, 2013-09-08 at 15:36 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sun, 2013-09-08 at 16:19 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:53:58PM +0200, Helge Deller wrote:
On 08/28/2013 11:35 PM, Bastian Blank wrote:
Looks reasonable. But please send further changes to remove the
On Wed, 2013-08-28 at 23:22 +0200, Helge Deller wrote:
[...]
diff -up ./debian/config/hppa/config.parisc64-smp.org
./debian/config/hppa/config.parisc64-smp
--- ./debian/config/hppa/config.parisc64-smp.org2013-05-04
04:44:45.0 +0200
+++
On Sun, 2013-09-08 at 17:30 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
[...]
+# For the built-in SCSI controller in C8000 workstation
+CONFIG_FUSION=y
Why should this be built-in?
Never mind, it doesn't select code...
+CONFIG_FUSION_SPI=m
[...]
but both the FUSION and FUSION_SPI symbol settings are
On 09/08/2013 04:19 PM, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:53:58PM +0200, Helge Deller wrote:
On 08/28/2013 11:35 PM, Bastian Blank wrote:
Looks reasonable. But please send further changes to remove the
non-smp kernels.
I can do that. Do you have some background on this request
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/08/2013 06:30 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Wed, 2013-08-28 at 23:22 +0200, Helge Deller wrote:
+# For the IDE CDROM in C8000 workstation
+CONFIG_IDE=m
+CONFIG_BLK_DEV_SIIMAGE=m
Why not CONFIG_PATA_SIL680 instead?
I will test if this works
On Sun, 2013-09-08 at 22:43 +0200, Helge Deller wrote:
On 09/08/2013 06:30 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Wed, 2013-08-28 at 23:22 +0200, Helge Deller wrote:
[...]
+CONFIG_FUSION_SPI=m
+
+# Built-in NIC in C8000 workstation
+CONFIG_E1000=m
This is redundant with the top-level config.
Package: linux
Version: 3.10
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Dear Debian kernel maintainers,
could you please apply the attached trivial patch, which enables support for
C8000 PARISC workstation with your latest 3.10 (and higher) unstable kernel.
Basically this patch just adds some more Linux
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:22:09PM +0200, Helge Deller wrote:
could you please apply the attached trivial patch, which enables support for
C8000 PARISC workstation with your latest 3.10 (and higher) unstable kernel.
Okay.
It would be nice, if you could apply this patch to your linux source
On 08/28/2013 11:35 PM, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:22:09PM +0200, Helge Deller wrote:
It would be nice, if you could apply this patch to your linux
source code tree.
Looks reasonable. But please send further changes to remove the
non-smp kernels.
I can do that. Do you
14 matches
Mail list logo
