Package: nfs-kernel-server
Version: 1:1.2.8-6
Followup-For: Bug #757835
Dear Maintainer,
I got segfaults too, below are the last working versions, anything newer
segfaults, whether I upgrade libtirpc1 or nfs-kernel-server.
For those who need quick fix/workaround:
deb
Control: reassign -1 gcc-4.9,nfs-kernel-server
Control: found -1 nfs-kernel-server/1.2.8-8
Control: found -1 gcc-4.9/4.9.1
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 12:54:00PM -0700, Petr Vandrovec wrote:
amd64. I think it affects all architectures. In case you want to
follow-up, attached is minimum testcase I
Processing control commands:
reassign -1 gcc-4.9,nfs-kernel-server
Bug #757835 [nfs-kernel-server] nfs-kernel-server: after update
1.2.8-6-1.2.8-8 rpc.mountd starts crashing
Bug reassigned from package 'nfs-kernel-server' to 'gcc-4.9,nfs-kernel-server'.
No longer marked as found in versions
Am 12.08.2014 um 18:05 schrieb Steve Langasek:
Control: reassign -1 gcc-4.9,nfs-kernel-server
Control: found -1 nfs-kernel-server/1.2.8-8
Control: found -1 gcc-4.9/4.9.1
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 12:54:00PM -0700, Petr Vandrovec wrote:
amd64. I think it affects all architectures. In case
On Tue, 2014-08-12 at 19:23 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Tue, 2014-08-12 at 09:05 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
[...]
Matthias, could you please have a look at the below test case? We have a
regression in the latest nfs-kernel-server build, which appears to be caused
by a gcc-4.9 bug.
On Tue, 2014-08-12 at 09:05 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
[...]
Matthias, could you please have a look at the below test case? We have a
regression in the latest nfs-kernel-server build, which appears to be caused
by a gcc-4.9 bug.
Should I work around this in nfs-utils, or is a quick fix
On 2014-08-12 20:23 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Tue, 2014-08-12 at 09:05 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
[...]
Matthias, could you please have a look at the below test case? We have a
regression in the latest nfs-kernel-server build, which appears to be caused
by a gcc-4.9 bug.
Should I
Package: nfs-kernel-server
Version: 1:1.2.8-8
Followup-For: Bug #757835
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
This bug is already fixed in upstream (included since 1.3.1-rc2):
http://git.linux-nfs.org/?p=steved/nfs-utils.git;a=commit;h=25e83c2270b2d2966c992885faed0b79be09f474
On Tue, 2014-08-12 at 20:54 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2014-08-12 20:23 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Tue, 2014-08-12 at 09:05 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
[...]
Matthias, could you please have a look at the below test case? We have a
regression in the latest nfs-kernel-server
Package: nfs-kernel-server
Version: 1:1.2.8-8
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
Here is snippet from /var/log/messages of my nfs-server:
Aug 11 20:54:05 muikku kernel: [12322.241131]
NFSD: Using /var/lib/nfs/v4recovery as the NFSv4 state recovery directory
Aug 11 20:54:05 muikku kernel:
Control: severity -1 grave
On 2014-08-11 20:04 +0200, Antti Järvinen wrote:
Package: nfs-kernel-server
Version: 1:1.2.8-8
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
Here is snippet from /var/log/messages of my nfs-server:
Aug 11 20:54:05 muikku kernel: [12322.241131]
NFSD: Using
Processing control commands:
severity -1 grave
Bug #757835 [nfs-kernel-server] nfs-kernel-server: after update
1.2.8-6-1.2.8-8 rpc.mountd starts crashing
Severity set to 'grave' from 'normal'
--
757835: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=757835
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Hi,
it seems to be gcc bug. For inexplicable reason compiler optimized
'if (cp *cp)' to just 'if (*cp)' :-(
Changing 'char *cp' to 'char * volatile cp' at line 468 in
support/export/client.c is enough to explain to gcc that it has no
idea what it is doing, and fixes the crash.
I think that
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 11:49:16AM -0700, Petr Vandrovec wrote:
Hi,
it seems to be gcc bug. For inexplicable reason compiler optimized
'if (cp *cp)' to just 'if (*cp)' :-(
Changing 'char *cp' to 'char * volatile cp' at line 468 in
support/export/client.c is enough to explain to gcc that
amd64. I think it affects all architectures. In case you want to
follow-up, attached is minimum testcase I could come up with. It
crashes with gcc-4.9 and -O2. No crash with gcc-4.8, or at -O1.
$gcc-4.9 -W -Wall -O2 client.c ./a.out
Segmentation fault
$gcc-4.8 -W -Wall -O2 client.c ./a.out
15 matches
Mail list logo