Bug#783291: /bin/touch is missing if built with BUSYBOX=n

2015-04-25 Thread Michael Biebl
On Sat, 25 Apr 2015 14:21:04 +0200 Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org I can reproduce the missing /bin/touch if I build the initramfs without busybox support. Can you check your /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf if it contains BUSYBOX=n or if you have a snippet in /etc/initramfs-tools/conf.d/

Bug#783291: /bin/touch is missing if built with BUSYBOX=n

2015-04-25 Thread Michael Biebl
[Sorry, this was meant to go to bug #783291, not #783282] Am 25.04.2015 um 15:55 schrieb Michael Biebl: Am 25.04.2015 um 14:21 schrieb Michael Biebl: I can reproduce the missing /bin/touch if I build the initramfs without busybox support. Can you check your /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf

Bug#783291: /bin/touch is missing if built with BUSYBOX=n

2015-04-25 Thread Michael Biebl
Control: tags -1 + patch Am 25.04.2015 um 14:21 schrieb Michael Biebl: Maybe it could replace the following line in /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/functions: touch $FSCK_STAMPFILE with : $FSCK_STAMPFILE This will work, even when built with busybox. The attached patch should

Bug#783291: /bin/touch is missing if built with BUSYBOX=n

2015-04-25 Thread Michael Biebl
Package: initramfs-tools Version: 0.120 Severity: important Am 25.04.2015 um 04:58 schrieb Mike Kupfer: Michael Biebl wrote: Which initramfs-tools version do you have installed? ii initramfs-tool 0.120all generic modular initramfs generat Have you made sure, your

Bug#783291: /bin/touch is missing if built with BUSYBOX=n

2015-04-25 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 25.04.2015 um 14:44 schrieb Michael Biebl: I just tried to boot a system where the initramfs had been built with BUSYBOX=n. This failed miserably and ended in a kernel panic. /init: exec: line 330: switch_root: not found [attempted to kill init ...] Looks to me, as if BUSYBOX=n mode

Bug#783291: /bin/touch is missing if built with BUSYBOX=n

2015-04-25 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 25.04.2015 um 14:44 schrieb Michael Biebl: On Sat, 25 Apr 2015 14:21:04 +0200 Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org I can reproduce the missing /bin/touch if I build the initramfs without busybox support. Can you check your /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf if it contains BUSYBOX=n or if you

Bug#783291: /bin/touch is missing if built with BUSYBOX=n

2015-04-25 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 25.04.2015 um 15:51 schrieb Michael Biebl: Am 25.04.2015 um 14:44 schrieb Michael Biebl: I just tried to boot a system where the initramfs had been built with BUSYBOX=n. This failed miserably and ended in a kernel panic. /init: exec: line 330: switch_root: not found [attempted to kill

Bug#783291: /bin/touch is missing if built with BUSYBOX=n

2015-04-25 Thread Mike Kupfer
Michael Biebl wrote: Am 25.04.2015 um 15:55 schrieb Michael Biebl: Am 25.04.2015 um 14:21 schrieb Michael Biebl: I can reproduce the missing /bin/touch if I build the initramfs without busybox support. Can you check your /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf if it contains BUSYBOX=n or if