Bug#785065: vdso32 fails to built on ppc64el

2016-06-16 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Thu, 2016-06-16 at 11:03 -0300, Breno Leitao wrote: > Ben, > > On Tue, 26 May 2015 01:58:09 +0100 Ben Hutchings wrote: > > Thanks for restoring support for 32-bit code generation.  I recognise > > it's not something you really want to support, so I'm leaving the kernel >

Bug#785065: vdso32 fails to built on ppc64el

2016-06-16 Thread Breno Leitao
Ben, On Tue, 26 May 2015 01:58:09 +0100 Ben Hutchings wrote: Thanks for restoring support for 32-bit code generation. I recognise it's not something you really want to support, so I'm leaving the kernel bug open but changing the title/severity accordingly. This was

Bug#785065: vdso32 fails to built on ppc64el

2015-05-25 Thread Ben Hutchings
Control: retitle -1 ppc64el kernel build requires multilib compiler Control: severity -1 normal Thanks for restoring support for 32-bit code generation. I recognise it's not something you really want to support, so I'm leaving the kernel bug open but changing the title/severity accordingly.

Processed: Re: Bug#785065: vdso32 fails to built on ppc64el

2015-05-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: retitle -1 ppc64el kernel build requires multilib compiler Bug #785065 [src:linux] vdso32 fails to built on ppc64el Changed Bug title to 'ppc64el kernel build requires multilib compiler' from 'vdso32 fails to built on ppc64el' severity -1 normal Bug #785065

Bug#785065: vdso32 fails to built on ppc64el

2015-05-15 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On 2015-05-12 15:55, Matthias Klose wrote: that should be fixed on the kernel side by removing this code. there never was a powerpcle userland support. If this is not possible in the short term, then we can re-enable this for unstable for some time. This also seems to break grub2 on

Bug#785065: vdso32 fails to built on ppc64el

2015-05-12 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Tue, 2015-05-12 at 15:55 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: that should be fixed on the kernel side by removing this code. there never was a powerpcle userland support. I agree we have no use for this code. Unfortunately it is currently non-optional. If this is not possible in the short term,

Bug#785065: vdso32 fails to built on ppc64el

2015-05-12 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Tue, 2015-05-12 at 17:21 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Tue, 2015-05-12 at 15:55 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: that should be fixed on the kernel side by removing this code. there never was a powerpcle userland support. I agree we have no use for this code. Unfortunately it is

Bug#785065: vdso32 fails to built on ppc64el

2015-05-12 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Tue, 2015-05-12 at 18:32 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Tue, 2015-05-12 at 17:21 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Tue, 2015-05-12 at 15:55 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: that should be fixed on the kernel side by removing this code. there never was a powerpcle userland support. I

Bug#785065: vdso32 fails to built on ppc64el

2015-05-12 Thread Matthias Klose
that should be fixed on the kernel side by removing this code. there never was a powerpcle userland support. If this is not possible in the short term, then we can re-enable this for unstable for some time. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

Bug#785065: vdso32 fails to built on ppc64el

2015-05-11 Thread Ben Hutchings
Package: src:linux Version: 4.0.2-1 Severity: serious /«PKGBUILDDIR»/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso32/gettimeofday.S: Assembler messages: /«PKGBUILDDIR»/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso32/gettimeofday.S:42: Error: syntax error; found `@', expected `,'