On 26/02/2021 15:03, Timo Rothenpieler wrote:
I think I can reproduce this, or something that at least looks very
similar to this, on 5.10. Namely on 5.10.17 (On both Client and Server).
I think this is a different issue - see below.
We are running slurm, and since a while now (coincides
I think I can reproduce this, or something that at least looks very
similar to this, on 5.10. Namely on 5.10.17 (On both Client and Server).
We are running slurm, and since a while now (coincides with updating
from 5.4 to 5.10, but a whole bunch of other stuff was updated at the
same time, so
On 21/02/2021 14:37, Bruce Fields wrote:
On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 11:38:51AM +, Anton Ivanov wrote:
On 21/02/2021 09:13, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 08:16:26PM +, Chuck Lever wrote:
Confirming you are varying client-side kernels. Should the Linux
NFS client
On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 11:38:51AM +, Anton Ivanov wrote:
> On 21/02/2021 09:13, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> >On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 08:16:26PM +, Chuck Lever wrote:
> >>Confirming you are varying client-side kernels. Should the Linux
> >>NFS client maintainers be Cc'd?
> >
> >Ok,
On 21/02/2021 09:13, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 08:16:26PM +, Chuck Lever wrote:
On Feb 20, 2021, at 3:13 PM, Anton Ivanov
wrote:
On 20/02/2021 20:04, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 07:19:54PM +0100, Anton Ivanov wrote:
Hi
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 08:16:26PM +, Chuck Lever wrote:
>
>
> > On Feb 20, 2021, at 3:13 PM, Anton Ivanov
> > wrote:
> >
> > On 20/02/2021 20:04, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 07:19:54PM +0100, Anton Ivanov wrote:
> >>> Hi list,
> >>>
> >>>
> On Feb 20, 2021, at 3:13 PM, Anton Ivanov
> wrote:
>
> On 20/02/2021 20:04, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 07:19:54PM +0100, Anton Ivanov wrote:
>>> Hi list,
>>>
>>> NFS caching appears broken in 4.19.37.
>>>
>>> The more cores/threads the easier to
On 20/02/2021 20:04, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 07:19:54PM +0100, Anton Ivanov wrote:
Hi list,
NFS caching appears broken in 4.19.37.
The more cores/threads the easier to reproduce. Tested with identical
results on Ryzen 1600 and 1600X.
1. Mount an openwrt build
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 07:19:54PM +0100, Anton Ivanov wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> NFS caching appears broken in 4.19.37.
>
> The more cores/threads the easier to reproduce. Tested with identical
> results on Ryzen 1600 and 1600X.
>
> 1. Mount an openwrt build tree over NFS v4
> 2. Run make -j
9 matches
Mail list logo