Re: Call for 2.6.22-2 [Was, Re: 2.6.22]

2007-07-22 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 12:00:26AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 02:45:26PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: This is fixed now, but in the meantime 2.6.22-1 has been uploaded. (I'm really tempted to disable the separate 'vserver' flavor for alpha to get manageable build

Call for 2.6.22-2 [Was, Re: 2.6.22]

2007-07-18 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 10:50:24AM -0600, dann frazier wrote: On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 06:07:24PM -0600, dann frazier wrote: On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 03:08:36PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: According to the projectb, only amd64, arm, i386, ia64 and powerpc had linux-2.6/experimental built.

Re: Call for 2.6.22-2 [Was, Re: 2.6.22]

2007-07-18 Thread Bastian Blank
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 02:45:26PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: This is fixed now, but in the meantime 2.6.22-1 has been uploaded. (I'm really tempted to disable the separate 'vserver' flavor for alpha to get manageable build times on my ev56 for testing...) Drop the -legacy and -smp images.

Re: Call for 2.6.22-2 [Was, Re: 2.6.22]

2007-07-18 Thread dann frazier
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 02:45:26PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: This is fixed now, but in the meantime 2.6.22-1 has been uploaded. (I'm really tempted to disable the separate 'vserver' flavor for alpha to get manageable build times on my ev56 for testing...) Are there other currently pending