Hello,
> BTW -- while we're on the topic of 2.6.32 and the next Debian release,
> and 802.11, do you guys ship iw by default yet? If not I highly
> encourage it. It should be shipped just as iwconfig is shipped. iw is
> the replacement for iwconfig, it uses the new nl80211 and nl80211 is
> used by
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 04:44 +0200, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
>> Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>> > Can you guys upstream a package into Debian with a gitweb URL reference?
>> If I'm understanding the question correctly, yes. We have Vcs-$VCS (i.e.
>> Vcs
On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 04:44 +0200, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
> Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > Can you guys upstream a package into Debian with a gitweb URL reference?
> If I'm understanding the question correctly, yes. We have Vcs-$VCS (i.e.
> Vcs-Git) and Vcs-Browser pseudo-headers. Both are optional.
Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> Can you guys upstream a package into Debian with a gitweb URL reference?
If I'm understanding the question correctly, yes. We have Vcs-$VCS (i.e.
Vcs-Git) and Vcs-Browser pseudo-headers. Both are optional.
I agree with Kel here, git2cl et al are unimportant details.
Kel
On Tuesday 02 March 2010 04:13:25 Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 8:09 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 10:47 -0500, John W. Linville wrote:
> >
> >> FWIW, I don't create the tarballs. Perhaps we could ask Johannes to
> >> do something in his scripts that create th
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Kel Modderman wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 March 2010 04:13:25 Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 8:09 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 10:47 -0500, John W. Linville wrote:
>> >
>> >> FWIW, I don't create the tarballs. Perhaps we could ask
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 8:09 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 10:47 -0500, John W. Linville wrote:
>
>> FWIW, I don't create the tarballs. Perhaps we could ask Johannes to
>> do something in his scripts that create them? Beyond that I don't
>> see much point in checking-in a ChangeLog
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 01:43:46PM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> >> > I'd suggest that 'make dist' should include a ChangeLog file in the
> >> > tarball, generated with git2cl or git log or whatever. A NEWS file
> >> > summarising the user-visible changes in each version would also be a
> >> >
On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 10:47 -0500, John W. Linville wrote:
> FWIW, I don't create the tarballs. Perhaps we could ask Johannes to
> do something in his scripts that create them? Beyond that I don't
> see much point in checking-in a ChangeLog.
It definitely shouldn't be checked into git, but rath
On Sat, 2010-02-27 at 23:59 +0200, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
> I'm a member of pkg-wpa-devel and I've been sponsoring Kel for almost 4
> years. I have absolute trust in him and I've even offered to advocate
> him to the NM process multiple times.
I'd definitely agree with your assessment here and w
Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> As per Paul Wise' advice I'd like to request for help with the
> crda/wireless-regdb package for Debian for the next release of Debian.
> I am the upstream crda maintainer and John Linville is the upstream
> wireless-regdb maintainer. Kel Modderman has already done most w
Adding debian-devel and debian-mentors.
As per Paul Wise' advice I'd like to request for help with the
crda/wireless-regdb package for Debian for the next release of Debian.
I am the upstream crda maintainer and John Linville is the upstream
wireless-regdb maintainer. Kel Modderman has already don
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 09:19 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> Upstream does not do the same. Ubuntu packages these two together
> right now but it was because it made life easier for packaging.
>
> John, do you guys package wireless-regdb and crda together on Fedora
> land? Was this because of th
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 10:14 AM, John W. Linville
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 09:19:06AM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
>
>> > I don't really like that it merges the two packages. I don't think that
>> > is appropriate unless upstream is
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 09:19:06AM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
> > I don't really like that it merges the two packages. I don't think that
> > is appropriate unless upstream is going to do the same.
>
> Upstream does not do the same. Ubuntu
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-02-05 at 15:11 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>
>> And after reviewing this again, I conclude Kel already did all the
>> work :) So any mentors / DDs willing to take his package up?
>>
>> I think its at:
>>
>> dget -ux http://sidux.
On Fri, 2010-02-05 at 15:11 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> And after reviewing this again, I conclude Kel already did all the
> work :) So any mentors / DDs willing to take his package up?
>
> I think its at:
>
> dget -ux http://sidux.net/kelmo/sidux/crap/crda/crda_1.1.1-1.dsc
Ok, here are m
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 6:03 AM, Kel Modderman wrote:
>>> On Thursday 04 February 2010 11:42:33 Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
>
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 6:03 AM, Kel Modderman wrote:
>> On Thursday 04 February 2010 11:42:33 Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
>>> > On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 09:58 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 4:43 PM, John W. Linville wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 04:25:53PM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>
>> > Also, it seems that the REGDB_CHANGED stuff in wireless-regdb/Makefile
>> > does not
>> > work as expected - the sha1sum.txt file possibly contains the hash from an
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 04:25:53PM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > Also, it seems that the REGDB_CHANGED stuff in wireless-regdb/Makefile does
> > not
> > work as expected - the sha1sum.txt file possibly contains the hash from an
> > old
> > db.txt
>
> Yeah, John -- can you please run:
>
>
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 6:03 AM, Kel Modderman wrote:
> On Thursday 04 February 2010 11:42:33 Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 09:58 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>> >
>> >> I can help with this only if no one else is up for
On Thursday 04 February 2010 11:42:33 Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 09:58 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> >
> >> I can help with this only if no one else is up for it. I personally
> >> however find building a key on the fly
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 09:58 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>
>> I can help with this only if no one else is up for it. I personally
>> however find building a key on the fly for each build pretty pointless
>> and would like to know if a package w
On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 09:58 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> I can help with this only if no one else is up for it. I personally
> however find building a key on the fly for each build pretty pointless
> and would like to know if a package would be acceptable upstream on
> Debian if OpenSSL is us
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 6:46 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 10:54 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> Given the OpenSSL stuff in crda 1.1.1, I don't think there are any
> technical roadblocks before crda/wireless-regdb can be uploaded to
> Debian (once the packaging implements what I
On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 10:54 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> Exactly, this is already taken care of upstream with OpenSSL. The
> default directory is /etc/wireless-regdb/pubkeys/
Excellent.
> Patches for this are welcomed upstream on CRDA. Is this a requirement
> for Debian to package CRDA?
No
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 6:57 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
> [Please keep me in CC for this thread]
>
> There is a technical change coming in Debian that may mean one key for
> the pkg-wpa folks will be more problematic; it is planned that
> maintainer-built .debs are to be thrown away on upload (but still
On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 10:57 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> * wireless-regdb could check at build time if the source database
> has been modified and a new binary database been rebuilt
> * If so
> * generate a new temporary key at build time
>
[Please keep me in CC for this thread]
There is a technical change coming in Debian that may mean one key for
the pkg-wpa folks will be more problematic; it is planned that
maintainer-built .debs are to be thrown away on upload (but still
required) and all packages rebuilt on the buildds. There wi
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 06:11:50AM +1000, Kel Modderman wrote:
> There are potentially lots of people who could be building/uploading these
> packages and having the same private key for all people to sign regulatory.bin
> may not be feasible.
>
> Generating a one time private key requires that w
On Friday 29 January 2010 04:10:04 Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> I asked Kel Modderman [3] about the packages and it seems he is really
> busy with quite a few moves he has been doing and just lacks time to
> get wireless-regdb and crda packaged into Debian. I am the upstream
> CRDA maintainer and hav
Hey folks,
I wanted to try to help Debian in ways in which I can with the new
regulatory infrastructure upstream on the Linux kernel. As of recent
(>= 2.6.34) the old regulatory stuff has been deprecated and replaced
completely for CFG80211_INTERNAL_REGDB, the old regulatory framework
was also dis
33 matches
Mail list logo
