On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 11:58:22AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
On Mon, 2008-09-08 at 18:37 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 10:06:26AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
Parisc is a CONFIG_GEN_RTC architecture (we use the generic real time
clock driver).
Well.
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 10:58:35AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
fyi, I've got an hppa build in progress - disabling RTC_CLASS causes
the symbols below to be removed (essentially, ^rtc_*)
The whole new-style rtc support.
I'm not sure what's behind the hppa/ABI removal commits - I didn't see
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 12:48:35PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
They certainly have to be inessential to the parisc ABI ... they don't
work if anything's actually trying to use them.
Really? Which sort of don't work is this? Why should a I2C rtc device
(some dallas chip) not work?
Bastian
--
On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 10:58 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 11:58:22AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
On Mon, 2008-09-08 at 18:37 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 10:06:26AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
Parisc is a CONFIG_GEN_RTC architecture (we use
On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 19:38 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 10:58:35AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
fyi, I've got an hppa build in progress - disabling RTC_CLASS causes
the symbols below to be removed (essentially, ^rtc_*)
The whole new-style rtc support.
But it doesn't
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 01:12:01PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 20:01 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 12:48:35PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
They certainly have to be inessential to the parisc ABI ... they don't
work if anything's actually
On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 20:01 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 12:48:35PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
They certainly have to be inessential to the parisc ABI ... they don't
work if anything's actually trying to use them.
Really? Which sort of don't work is this? Why
Um, because the architecture doesn't have an i2c bus.
Don't know about rtc but some PA-RISC models definitely have an i2c bus.
I see this message on a A500-75 model:
The support bus which connects the system processors, the Guardian Service
Processor (GSP) and the Power Monitor or
On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 20:29 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 01:12:01PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 20:01 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 12:48:35PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
They certainly have to be inessential to the
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 02:42:03PM -0400, John David Anglin wrote:
Um, because the architecture doesn't have an i2c bus.
Don't know about rtc but some PA-RISC models definitely have an i2c bus.
I see this message on a A500-75 model:
The support bus which connects the system
This I2C bus is not acessible by the operating system (as far as I know).
HP-UX seems to be able to access fan and power status somehow. It
sends me an email when it thinks the i2c is hung, and once a day,
it sends a message that a fan which the chassis doesn't have (as far
as I can tell) has
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 9:20 PM, John David Anglin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This I2C bus is not acessible by the operating system (as far as I know).
HP-UX seems to be able to access fan and power status somehow. It
Fan and power status are accessed through PDC. That's what I do with
the
On Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 10:06:26AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
Parisc is a CONFIG_GEN_RTC architecture (we use the generic real time
clock driver).
Well.
Starting with 2.6.26, debian is now enabling
CONFIG_RTC_CLASS (for platforms with specific RTC drivers) which
disables
On Mon, 2008-09-08 at 18:37 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 10:06:26AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
Parisc is a CONFIG_GEN_RTC architecture (we use the generic real time
clock driver).
Well.
Starting with 2.6.26, debian is now enabling
14 matches
Mail list logo
