On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 16:32:55 Ben Hutchings wrote:
This will be Linux 3.16, due to be released in early August. Release
candidates for Linux 3.16 are already packaged and available in the
experimental suite.
Do you plan to back-port BTRFS changes to 3.16?
I'm thinking of filing a bug report
On Thu, 2014-07-31 at 20:08 +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 16:32:55 Ben Hutchings wrote:
This will be Linux 3.16, due to be released in early
August. Release
candidates for Linux 3.16 are already packaged and available in the
experimental suite.
Do you plan
On Thu, 31 Jul 2014 16:35:55 Ben Hutchings wrote:
I'm thinking of filing a bug report against the Debian-installer
package to warn people about BTRFS. I don't believe that BTRFS in 3.15
is suitable for a typical Debian user and I don't know how good 3.16
will be.
Do you think some
On Fri, 2014-08-01 at 10:35 +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jul 2014 16:35:55 Ben Hutchings wrote:
I'm thinking of filing a bug report against the Debian-installer
package to warn people about BTRFS. I don't believe that BTRFS in 3.15
is suitable for a typical Debian user and I
The Debian Linux kernel team has discussed and chosen the kernel version
to use as a basis for Debian 8 'jessie'.
This will be Linux 3.16, due to be released in early August. Release
candidates for Linux 3.16 are already packaged and available in the
experimental suite.
If you maintain a
On Fri, 2014-07-18 at 17:43 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
[...]
So we have a choice between:
Linux 3.14-stable
- Supported by Greg for about 2 years after release (March 2014)
- As an official kernel.org branch, it is likely to get some more
testing and review, and more backports from
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 11:39:15PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Fri, 2014-07-18 at 17:43 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
[...]
Linux 3.16-stable
- Supported by Ubuntu kernel team for about 15-18 months after distro
release (October 2014)
[...]
Note, that period is based on it being
On Sun, 2014-07-20 at 01:44 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Fri, 2014-07-18 at 22:19 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
OOI who is it that is going to be basing on 3.14?
I don't know specifically, but he implied that consumer electronics
companies would be using it in a lot of products.
Thanks.
So
On Fri, 2014-07-18 at 17:43 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
[...]
Linux 3.16-stable
- Supported by Ubuntu kernel team for about 15-18 months after distro
release (October 2014)
[...]
Note, that period is based on it being provided as an alternate kernel
for Ubuntu 14.04 LTS. My understanding is
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 05:43:06PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Thu, 2014-05-01 at 17:29 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
[...]
The earlier we freeze the kernel, the more work will be required to
backport fixes and hardware enablement during the jessie support period.
So I think that 3.16
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk schrieb:
Ubuntu 14.10 is planned to use Linux 3.16, in which case Ubuntu will
maintain a 3.16-stable branch (not blessed by kernel.org, but still
following the same rules).
So we have a choice between:
Linux 3.14-stable
- Supported by Greg for about 2
On Fri, 2014-07-18 at 22:19 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Fri, 2014-07-18 at 17:43 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Thu, 2014-05-01 at 17:29 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
[...]
The earlier we freeze the kernel, the more work will be required to
backport fixes and hardware enablement during
On Thu, 2014-05-01 at 17:29 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
[...]
The earlier we freeze the kernel, the more work will be required to
backport fixes and hardware enablement during the jessie support period.
So I think that 3.16 would be the best fit.
It is also very unlikely that a PREEMPT_RT
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 05:43:06PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Thu, 2014-05-01 at 17:29 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Linux 3.14-stable
- Supported by Greg for about 2 years after release (March 2014)
- As an official kernel.org branch, it is likely to get some more
testing and review,
On Fri, 2014-07-18 at 17:43 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Thu, 2014-05-01 at 17:29 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
[...]
The earlier we freeze the kernel, the more work will be required to
backport fixes and hardware enablement during the jessie support period.
So I think that 3.16 would be
On Fri, 2014-07-18 at 22:41 +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 05:43:06PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Thu, 2014-05-01 at 17:29 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Linux 3.14-stable
- Supported by Greg for about 2 years after release (March 2014)
- As an official
On Thu, 2014-05-01 at 17:29 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Based on a linear regression of Linux release dates since 3.2, I
extrapolated that the latest stable release at freeze time will likely
be 3.17: http://www.decadent.org.uk/ben/tmp/linux-release-dates.svg.
However, there will be little
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk schrieb:
--=-7K30lQ4BLoJ3LSF2G3VV
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Based on a linear regression of Linux release dates since 3.2, I
extrapolated that the latest stable release at freeze time will likely
Based on a linear regression of Linux release dates since 3.2, I
extrapolated that the latest stable release at freeze time will likely
be 3.17: http://www.decadent.org.uk/ben/tmp/linux-release-dates.svg.
However, there will be little time for any necessary but disruptive
fixes or packaging
19 matches
Mail list logo
