Re: Proposed removal of kernel AX.25 support

2019-07-31 Thread Iain Learmonth
Hi, On 31/07/2019 00:53, Ben Hutchings wrote: > Iain seems to be saying in > that ax25 > is now badly broken, and I don't think we should enable badly broken > features. (However, so far as I know the only reason it's disabled on >

Re: Proposed removal of kernel AX.25 support

2019-07-30 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sun, 2019-07-28 at 21:43 +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 07:17:23PM +0100, Iain Learmonth wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On 26/07/2019 19:10, Iain Learmonth wrote: > > > I am a maintainer for the libax25 and ax25-apps packages, and these > > > packages are not in great shape.

Re: Proposed removal of kernel AX.25 support

2019-07-28 Thread Uwe Kleine-König
On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 07:17:23PM +0100, Iain Learmonth wrote: > Hi, > > On 26/07/2019 19:10, Iain Learmonth wrote: > > I am a maintainer for the libax25 and ax25-apps packages, and these > > packages are not in great shape. These are userspace packages that > > compliment the AX.25 networking

Re: Proposed removal of kernel AX.25 support

2019-07-26 Thread Iain Learmonth
Hi, On 26/07/2019 19:10, Iain Learmonth wrote: > I am a maintainer for the libax25 and ax25-apps packages, and these > packages are not in great shape. These are userspace packages that > compliment the AX.25 networking support in the Linux kernel. I would > like to propose that we do not ship