Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk writes:
(See the complaints about removing OpenVZ in wheezy despite 4 years'
advance notice of this.)
There were complaints when this was originally decided four years ago by
the kernel team. What is disturbing is that the complaints then (lxc is
not even
(adding few CC:s to keep track on the bug)
On dim., 2012-01-29 at 21:26 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sun, 2012-01-29 at 20:57 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
On dim., 2012-01-29 at 18:22 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Featuresets
---
The only featureset provided will be
On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 11:05 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
(adding few CC:s to keep track on the bug)
On dim., 2012-01-29 at 21:26 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sun, 2012-01-29 at 20:57 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
On dim., 2012-01-29 at 18:22 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Ben Hutchings, 2012-01-29 18:22:05 + :
[...]
Featuresets
---
The only featureset provided will be 'rt' (realtime), currently built
for amd64 only. If there is interest in realtime support for other
architectures, we may be able to add that. However, we do need to
consider
[Brad Spengler]
Frankly it makes more sense for me to offer .debs myself than to deal
with a bureaucracy and non-standard kernel in Debian. It contains
who-knows-what extra code, and I doubt anyone looked at any of it to
see if it allows for some way to leak information I prevent against a
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk schrieb:
But practically this means that we have to either carry
the featureset indefinitely or disappoint users by removing it in a
later release. (See the complaints about removing OpenVZ in wheezy
despite 4 years' advance notice of this.)
That's not
On Jan 29, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
If there are particular container features that should be enabled or
backported to provide a useful replacement for OpenVZ or VServer,
please let us know. We cannot promise that these will all be enabled
but we need to know what is
The only featureset provided will be 'rt' (realtime), currently built
for amd64 only. If there is interest in realtime support for other
architectures, we may be able to add that.
We at MSU are definitly interested in -rt for 32-bit x86 (with pae).
Before now, we have been building packages
On dim., 2012-01-29 at 18:22 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Featuresets
---
The only featureset provided will be 'rt' (realtime), currently built
for amd64 only. If there is interest in realtime support for other
architectures, we may be able to add that. However, we do need to
On Sun, 2012-01-29 at 20:03 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Jan 29, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
If there are particular container features that should be enabled or
backported to provide a useful replacement for OpenVZ or VServer,
please let us know. We cannot promise that
On Sun, 2012-01-29 at 20:57 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
On dim., 2012-01-29 at 18:22 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Featuresets
---
The only featureset provided will be 'rt' (realtime), currently built
for amd64 only. If there is interest in realtime support for other
On Sun, 2012-01-29 at 21:26 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
So in the end what are the reasons for not trying the grsecurity
featureset? #605090 lacks any reply from the kernel team since quite a
while, and especially after answers were provided to question asked.
Whew I'd also be waiting
12 matches
Mail list logo
