Hi, ...
I just had a look at the 10 RC bugs we have open for linux-2.6, here it is :
- 4 bugs are for firmware and doc non-freeness or whatever.
- 392818: ext3 corruption issue in 2.6.18 found by RedHat
Maks you commented on it last, any information about a fix ?
- 393451:
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 12:17:10AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Then try that and make sure the hypervisor has no 32/64 bit
problems.
Hypervisor/kernel/tools must match register size, the other parts of the
userspace not.
Bastian
--
It is a human characteristic to love little animals,
Hello,
We have an urgent fix for ppc pending, thus I would like to upload ASAP
with what we have now, and make another upload when the other stuff is
done.
Read: we do an urgency=high upload of 2.6.18 today, if this is ok for
everyone... comments?
Best regards
Frederik Schueler
--
ENOSIG
* Frederik Schueler [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-11-01 16:13]:
Read: we do an urgency=high upload of 2.6.18 today, if this is ok for
everyone... comments?
I made some changes to ARM but they're all tested so it's fine with
me.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Hello Jurij,
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 07:35:49AM -0800, Jurij Smakov wrote:
I have one important fix in the pipe (boot failure on SunBlade1000). A
patch for it was posted recently, and I've just received a
confirmation that it fixes the problem. I'll build a test kernel
tonight and make
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 05:41:02PM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote:
Hello Jurij,
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 07:35:49AM -0800, Jurij Smakov wrote:
I have one important fix in the pipe (boot failure on SunBlade1000). A
patch for it was posted recently, and I've just received a
confirmation
On Wednesday 01 November 2006 16:13, Frederik Schueler wrote:
Read: we do an urgency=high upload of 2.6.18 today, if this is ok for
everyone... comments?
urgency=high is bogus as that only affects migration to testing and would
only be needed if 2.6.18 were already in testing.
Personally I'd
Hello,
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 07:23:04PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
urgency=high is bogus as that only affects migration to testing and would
only be needed if 2.6.18 were already in testing.
OK. What do you think about another 2.6.17 release through t-p-u then,
to fix the ppc issue in testing?
On Wednesday 01 November 2006 19:28, Frederik Schueler wrote:
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 07:23:04PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
urgency=high is bogus as that only affects migration to testing and
would only be needed if 2.6.18 were already in testing.
OK. What do you think about another 2.6.17
heya,
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 04:13:22PM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote:
We have an urgent fix for ppc pending, thus I would like to upload ASAP
with what we have now, and make another upload when the other stuff is
done.
Read: we do an urgency=high upload of 2.6.18 today, if this is ok
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Frederik Schueler wrote:
- the ext3 corruption (#392818)
fixed in 2.6.18.1
jan kara's patch fixes this issue that showed up on 1k bs
and stress testing with fsx.
i'll close the bug later.
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 02:13:33PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
So what if it takes a bit longer and takes a bit more disk space? Try
building on m68k. :)
Ask cts, it takes less. Especialy as m68k currently builds only two
images.
Bastian
--
I have never understood the female capacity
Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Frederik Schueler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061030 16:30]:
Fellow kernel-team members,
it has been a while since our last upload, and the issues are
cumulating. We have a total of 8 RC bugs we need to take care before the
release, and another dozen of
Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can we also have amd64-kernels again on i386?
Cheers,
Andi
The patch is in the BTS and quite small. About 5 lines of code change
and the obvious ton of .config files.
Replying to myself, juhey. Sorry
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 04:29:21PM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote:
I personally have somewhat lost the overview on on open issues being
busy with RL work the past 2 weeks, so I would like everyone of you to
compile a short list of things you have on your agenda for 2.6.18-4,
and generally
Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 02:13:33PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
So what if it takes a bit longer and takes a bit more disk space? Try
building on m68k. :)
Ask cts, it takes less. Especialy as m68k currently builds only two
images.
Bastian
He
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 05:30:57PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can we also have amd64-kernels again on i386?
Cheers,
Andi
The patch is in the BTS and quite small. About 5 lines of code
* Goswin von Brederlow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061031 17:31]:
Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can we also have amd64-kernels again on i386?
Cheers,
Andi
The patch is in the BTS and quite small. About 5 lines of code change
and
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 05:26:28PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 02:13:33PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
So what if it takes a bit longer and takes a bit more disk space? Try
building on m68k. :)
Ask cts, it
Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Goswin von Brederlow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061031 17:31]:
Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can we also have amd64-kernels again on i386?
Cheers,
Andi
The patch is in the BTS and quite
Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think xen or vserver are the perfect environment to have both worlds
live on the same machine. :)
Then try that and make sure the hypervisor has no 32/64 bit
problems.
I use mixed environment on the company server. We have 32 and 64 bit
* Frederik Schueler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061030 16:30]:
Fellow kernel-team members,
it has been a while since our last upload, and the issues are
cumulating. We have a total of 8 RC bugs we need to take care before the
release, and another dozen of driver issues we should try to sort out.
* Frederik Schueler wrote:
- alpha gcc-4.1 migration
It seems that there's no ABI bump for -4 wanted, so no way to move
alpha to gcc-4.1, I already reverted my earlier commit.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Hey,
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 04:56:17PM +0100, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
It seems that there's no ABI bump for -4 wanted, so no way to move
alpha to gcc-4.1, I already reverted my earlier commit.
We need to bump the ABI anyway because of changes in -3, and your
changes where planned for this
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 04:56:17PM +0100, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
* Frederik Schueler wrote:
- alpha gcc-4.1 migration
It seems that there's no ABI bump for -4 wanted, so no way to move
alpha to gcc-4.1, I already reverted my earlier commit.
Norbert
we already did an
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 04:56:17PM +0100, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
* Frederik Schueler wrote:
- alpha gcc-4.1 migration
It seems that there's no ABI bump for -4 wanted, so no way to move
alpha to gcc-4.1, I already reverted my earlier commit.
-3 broke ABI, causing the out-of-order module
On 2006-10-30, Frederik Schueler wrote:
[]
I personally have somewhat lost the overview on on open issues being=20
busy with RL work the past 2 weeks, so I would like everyone of you to
compile a short list of things you have on your agenda for 2.6.18-4,=20
and generally before the release.
I
Hello,
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 04:41:32PM +, Oleg Verych wrote:
I will not resend, please find my message to you, Frederik, for 18-3:
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.kernel/23077
Yes, driver backports are a topic too. We wanted to discuss
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 07:14:58PM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote:
I think PCIID updates are fine, and important new drivers needed for
installation, like network sata scsi or ata drivers. But this is just my
opinion, we might want to find a consensus in the team on this.
To aid in consensus,
29 matches
Mail list logo
