On Jun 6, 2013, at 12:07 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton l...@lkcl.net wrote:
[ please do try to remove debian-release from replies - my mistake
please try not to propagage it, even though it may be too late!]
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 10:16 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
Hello,
On Wed, 5 Jun 2013 16:48:27 -0400, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
fex covers *eevvveeerrthng* - right from flipping the
multiplexing for all 3 SD/MMC cards so that you can pretend that SD0
is SD2 and you can specify *different* GPIOs for each to say which
is
You can do
so the point is: if anyone wishes me to propose to allwinner that
they convert over to devicetree, or any other proposal which involves
significant low-level changes to their working practices that could
potentially have a massive knock-on effect onto their
multi-million-dollar clients, it
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 11:38:52PM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
their sheer overwhelming success provides us with mass-volume
ultra-low cost hardware. to not make an effort to accommodate them
would in this specific instance be a huge missed opportunity,
responsibility for
[non-debian lists dropped]
On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 20:46 +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
what's the point of mentioning this?
well, the point is: the expectation of the linux kernel developers is
that Everyone Must Convert To DeviceTree.
[...]
thoughts and discussion appreciated.
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
l...@lkcl.net wrote:
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 3:52 AM, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
The 3.8.y branch is over, so I think we have to move to 3.9, ready or
not. I merged the work in progress from trunk to sid and am
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
l...@lkcl.netwrote:
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 3:52 AM, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk
wrote:
The 3.8.y branch is over, so I think we have to move to 3.9, ready or
not. I merged the work in progress from trunk to sid and am
[i've just received word, please remove debian-release from discussions!]
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 9:46 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
Why don't you try converting the sunxi code over to device tree?
ok. perhaps i wasn't clear. whatever is proposed has to be be
acceptable to
[ please remove debian-release from future replies! my mistake -
please don't propagate it, thanks ]
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org wrote:
On 06/05/2013 02:46 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
On 06/05/2013 02:46 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
l...@lkcl.net mailto:l...@lkcl.net wrote:
...
the detect line, which is the write-protect line, to setting the DRAM
clock timings, saying which kernel driver must be loaded to
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 03:00:13PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
2) Having U-Boot itself read a DT and configure itself, just like the
kernel does. This is relatively new, and only supported by a few boards
(all Tegra to some extent, and a couple each Samsung Exynos and Xilinx
boards). I
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 10:24:15PM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
https://github.com/linux-sunxi/u-boot-sunxi
And Then Some, stephen. there are two versions of u-boot being used:
one is the community-assembled [GPL-compliant] one, and the other
includes a
[ please do try to remove debian-release from replies - my mistake
please try not to propagage it, even though it may be too late!]
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 10:16 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
li...@arm.linux.org.uk wrote:
eyy, allo russell, long time since we last spoke, which was eek around
2004
Hi Luke,
On Wednesday 05 of June 2013 22:15:08 Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
[i've just received word, please remove debian-release from
discussions!]
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 9:46 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com jonsm...@gmail.com
wrote:
Why don't you try converting the sunxi code over to
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 05:38:45PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
I haven't personally dealt with any nvidia arm devices, so I have no
idea how those are turning out, nor have I looked much at the marvell
ones yet (even though I have a cubox sitting on my desk I intend to play
around with).
On Wednesday 05 of June 2013 16:48:27 jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
l...@lkcl.net wrote:
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 3:52 AM, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk
wrote:
The 3.8.y branch is over, so I think we have to move to 3.9, ready
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 10:52 PM, Tomasz Figa tomasz.f...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Luke,
allo tomasz :)
ok - much of what you say is duplicated by what russell said, so in
effect the same reply is relevant, but there's been some cross-over.
i'll summarise below and cut all but the key question
On Wednesday 05 of June 2013 22:16:37 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 03:00:13PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
2) Having U-Boot itself read a DT and configure itself, just like the
kernel does. This is relatively new, and only supported by a few
boards
(all Tegra to
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 08:46:30PM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
to begin to describe the problem in getting allwinner soc source code
upstream is this: not only do we have the usual let's get it out the
door as fast as possible learning curve of a very young, very new and
[removing debian-release again - at their request]
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 11:11 PM, Tomasz Figa tomasz.f...@gmail.com wrote:
Allwinner has just reinvented a wheel, without even considering the fact
that it has been already invented.
apologies, tomasz, but i believe i covered this issue in,
On Wednesday 05 of June 2013 23:38:52 Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 10:52 PM, Tomasz Figa tomasz.f...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Luke,
allo tomasz :)
ok - much of what you say is duplicated by what russell said, so in
effect the same reply is relevant, but
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 12:27 AM, Tomasz Figa tomasz.f...@gmail.com wrote:
their sheer overwhelming success provides us with mass-volume
ultra-low cost hardware. to not make an effort to accommodate them
would in this specific instance be a huge missed opportunity,
OK, this is a large
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 11:56:43PM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
so there's a lot of factors which i believe the linux kernel
developers are not aware of, and haven't taken into account, and to
place blame onto the SoC vendors for not working with *you* when *you*
haven't made an
23 matches
Mail list logo
