Re: [Stable-review] Reverts needed for 2.6.32.x ia64 percpu usage

2010-06-01 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 05:32:33PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 08:41:34AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 10:36:20AM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > > > Hi Greg, > > > > > > Pinging for a revert request for 2.6.32.x. It seems like we had a > > > misund

Re: Reverts needed for 2.6.32.x ia64 percpu usage

2010-06-01 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 08:41:34AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 10:36:20AM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > > Hi Greg, > > > > Pinging for a revert request for 2.6.32.x. It seems like we had a > > misunderstanding about exactly which patches should be reverted. The email > > b

Re: Reverts needed for 2.6.32.x ia64 percpu usage

2010-06-01 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 10:36:20AM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > Hi Greg, > > Pinging for a revert request for 2.6.32.x. It seems like we had a > misunderstanding about exactly which patches should be reverted. The email > below > explains precisely which commits should be reverted from the 2

Reverts needed for 2.6.32.x ia64 percpu usage

2010-06-01 Thread Mathieu Desnoyers
Hi Greg, Pinging for a revert request for 2.6.32.x. It seems like we had a misunderstanding about exactly which patches should be reverted. The email below explains precisely which commits should be reverted from the 2.6.32.x stable series. Thanks, Mathieu - Forwarded message from Mathieu D