On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 08:25:10AM +0200, Thorsten Schifferdecker wrote:
Hi Maximilian,
since you add upstream OpenVZ fixes up to git commit 0f14912e3d2251aff,
Checkpointing work if enabled if enabled in feature-set/openvz/config,
but a bug existes in 2.6.24 and 2.6.26, chkpnt with a sit
Hi Maximilian,
Am Mi, 10.09.2008, 08:28, schrieb maximilian attems:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 08:25:10AM +0200, Thorsten Schifferdecker wrote:
Hi Maximilian,
since you add upstream OpenVZ fixes up to git commit 0f14912e3d2251aff,
Checkpointing work if enabled if enabled in
Hi Maximilian,
since you add upstream OpenVZ fixes up to git commit 0f14912e3d2251aff,
Checkpointing work if enabled if enabled in feature-set/openvz/config,
but a bug existes in 2.6.24 and 2.6.26, chkpnt with a sit device doesnt
work, see http://bugzilla.openvz.org/874
Regards,
Thorsten
--
maximilian attems wrote:
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 11:26:49PM +0300, Mert Dirik wrote:
Do you plan to fix #497292 for this release? It would be good although I'm
not
sure if it can be done before release since it is not important.
hmmm, CONFIG_VZ_CHECKPOINT defaults to n according to the
maximilian attems wrote:
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 11:26:49PM +0300, Mert Dirik wrote:
Do you plan to fix #497292 for this release? It would be good although I'm not
sure if it can be done before release since it is not important.
hmmm, CONFIG_VZ_CHECKPOINT defaults to n according to
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 02:09:52PM +0400, Kir Kolyshkin wrote:
If it's still possible to change this option, please do it.
Checkpointing is now working fine, it's totally our fault that we forgot
to switch the relative option.
So, please set CONFIG_VZ_CHECKPOINT=m. From the ABI point of
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008, Thorsten Schifferdecker wrote:
since you add upstream OpenVZ fixes up to git commit 0f14912e3d2251aff,
Checkpointing work if enabled if enabled in feature-set/openvz/config,
but a bug existes in 2.6.24 and 2.6.26, chkpnt with a sit device doesnt
work, see
Hi
I have filed an important bug now. It should enter the bug archive
shortly.
Best regards,
// Ola
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 02:57:48PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008, Thorsten Schifferdecker wrote:
since you add upstream OpenVZ fixes up to git commit
Hi again
The bug id is now #498510.
Best regards,
// Ola
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 07:28:18PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Hi
I have filed an important bug now. It should enter the bug archive
shortly.
Best regards,
// Ola
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 02:57:48PM +0200, maximilian attems
maximilian attems wrote:
did a build test and abicheck went positive like according your
statements. so enabled it for 2.6.26-6. as 2.6.26-5 upload happened
today can't say for sure when this will land. depends mostly on
next upstream stable release. will see to get it into Lenny.
Thank
maximilian attems wrote:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 02:09:52PM +0400, Kir Kolyshkin wrote:
If it's still possible to change this option, please do it.
Checkpointing is now working fine, it's totally our fault that we forgot
to switch the relative option.
So, please set
Hi folks
I intend to upload linux-2.6 2.6.26-5 tomorrow.
Fixes:
- 2.6.26.4
- SiS SATA
- OpenVZ update
Bastian
--
No more blah, blah, blah!
-- Kirk, Miri, stardate 2713.6
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
* Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-09-09 12:47]:
I intend to upload linux-2.6 2.6.26-5 tomorrow.
Fixes:
- 2.6.26.4
What about 2.6.26.5 (the build fix for 2.6.26.4)?
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 02:51:34PM +0300, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-09-09 12:47]:
I intend to upload linux-2.6 2.6.26-5 tomorrow.
Fixes:
- 2.6.26.4
What about 2.6.26.5 (the build fix for 2.6.26.4)?
Not applicable. The change was removed because of
Bastian Blank yazmış:
Hi folks
I intend to upload linux-2.6 2.6.26-5 tomorrow.
Fixes:
- 2.6.26.4
- SiS SATA
- OpenVZ update
Bastian
Do you plan to fix #497292 for this release? It would be good although I'm not
sure if it can be done before release since it is not important.
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 11:26:49PM +0300, Mert Dirik wrote:
Do you plan to fix #497292 for this release? It would be good although I'm not
sure if it can be done before release since it is not important.
hmmm, CONFIG_VZ_CHECKPOINT defaults to n according to the openvz patchset.
and the
16 matches
Mail list logo
