* Martin Michlmayr wrote:
FWIW, Falk Hueffner prepared the following patch which just needs
testing: http://people.debian.org/~falk/alpha-no-ev4-directive.patch
Included in gcc-4.1 4.1.1ds2-17.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
* Matthias Klose ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061013 06:43]:
Even if the kernel cannot be built with 4.1, it would be nice to have
bug reports. I'm not aware of any alpha related reports, although it's
not my pet arch.
Of course.
I'm still planning not to build g++-4.0 from the 4.0 sources, now that
* Norbert Tretkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-10-12 22:52]:
* Jurij Smakov wrote:
What needs to be done for alpha? Does it FTBFS with gcc 4.1?
Yes.
Anybody can run a build and make the log available?
Tomorrow.
FWIW, Falk Hueffner prepared the following patch which just needs
testing:
* Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Norbert Tretkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-10-12 22:52]:
* Jurij Smakov wrote:
What needs to be done for alpha? Does it FTBFS with gcc 4.1?
Yes.
Anybody can run a build and make the log available?
Tomorrow.
FWIW, Falk Hueffner prepared the
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 10:11:06AM -0700, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 01:53:58PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
I would like to schedule the upload of linux-2.6 2.6.18-3 for next
Thursday, 12th October.
Now we have
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 01:53:58PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
I would like to schedule the upload of linux-2.6 2.6.18-3 for next
Thursday, 12th October.
Now we have the desired date, nothing happened to the following issues.
Two big issues are still open:
- hppa FTBFS
- alpha gcc-4.0
* Bastian Blank ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061012 12:41]:
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 01:53:58PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
Two big issues are still open:
- hppa FTBFS
- alpha gcc-4.0 build dependency
What should we do with them? Finally disable alpha and hppa(64)?
I don't think it is an
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 01:58:53PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
So, the only two options seem to me:
b) we ship with what we have in etch now, that is 2.6.17.
This is no option.
Bastian
--
Captain's Log, star date 21:34.5...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 12:41:00PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 01:53:58PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
I would like to schedule the upload of linux-2.6 2.6.18-3 for next
Thursday, 12th October.
Now we have the desired date, nothing happened to the following
Bastian Blank wrote:
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 01:53:58PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
I would like to schedule the upload of linux-2.6 2.6.18-3 for next
Thursday, 12th October.
Now we have the desired date, nothing happened to the following issues.
Two big issues are still open:
-
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 01:58:53PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Bastian Blank ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061012 12:41]:
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 01:53:58PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
Two big issues are still open:
- hppa FTBFS
- alpha gcc-4.0 build dependency
What should we do with
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 10:11:06AM -0700, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 01:53:58PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
I would like to schedule the upload of linux-2.6 2.6.18-3 for next
Thursday, 12th October.
Now we have the desired date, nothing happened to the following
Steve Langasek writes:
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 01:58:53PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Bastian Blank ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061012 12:41]:
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 01:53:58PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
Two big issues are still open:
- hppa FTBFS
- alpha gcc-4.0 build
13 matches
Mail list logo
