Re: Some new 2.4.27 security patches

2006-02-08 Thread dann frazier
On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 12:26 +0900, Horms wrote: I have removed the original patch from sarge-security's 2.4.27-10sarge2 as I believe that these patches are far to large for a security release. I don't believe they have been closely examined. And we don't even have a CVE for them. Should we add

Re: Some new 2.4.27 security patches

2006-02-07 Thread Horms
On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 04:30:10PM +0900, Horms wrote: Also this patch: http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.4/diffs/fs/xfs/[EMAIL PROTECTED]|src/|src/fs|src/fs/xfs|related/fs/xfs/xfs_dinode.h|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|hist/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c ([XFS] Handle inode creation race) should also be

Re: Some new 2.4.27 security patches

2006-02-07 Thread Horms
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 12:26:27PM +0900, Horms wrote: On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 04:30:10PM +0900, Horms wrote: Also this patch: http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.4/diffs/fs/xfs/[EMAIL PROTECTED]|src/|src/fs|src/fs/xfs|related/fs/xfs/xfs_dinode.h|[EMAIL

Re: Some new 2.4.27 security patches

2005-10-14 Thread Horms
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 02:59:30PM -0400, micah wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Horms, I noticed that this patch is not applied to the 2.4.27 sarge1 update: http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.4/[EMAIL PROTECTED] The description reads: [XFS] Add nosymlinks inode

Re: Some new 2.4.27 security patches

2005-10-13 Thread Horms
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 02:59:30PM -0400, micah wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Horms, I noticed that this patch is not applied to the 2.4.27 sarge1 update: http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.4/[EMAIL PROTECTED] The description reads: [XFS] Add nosymlinks inode