On Tue, 2016-01-26 at 13:48 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-01-26 at 13:53 +0100, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 08:24:16AM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> [...]
> > > IMHO RPi1 is best supported by Raspbian, or if people really want it in
> > > Debian then by armel,
On Wed, 2016-01-27 at 19:16 +0100, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 05:41:58PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > ARMv5 multiplatform would be nice, but we're constrained by the size of
> > > flash partitions on the small machines that are supported so I don't
> > > think
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 06:25:59PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-01-27 at 19:16 +0100, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 05:41:58PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > > ARMv5 multiplatform would be nice, but we're constrained by the size of
> > > > flash
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 05:41:58PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > ARMv5 multiplatform would be nice, but we're constrained by the size of
> > flash partitions on the small machines that are supported so I don't
> > think this would work.
>
> I had another think about this and compared
On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 17:59 +0100, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 05:39:40PM +0100, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> > On Monday 25 January 2016 14:58:27 Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > > As I got the impression that support for the RPi was now present in
> > > > upstream and
On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 17:59 +0100, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 05:39:40PM +0100, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> > On Monday 25 January 2016 14:58:27 Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > > As I got the impression that support for the RPi was now
> present in
> > > > upstream and
On Tue, 2016-01-26 at 13:53 +0100, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 08:24:16AM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
[...]
> > IMHO RPi1 is best supported by Raspbian, or if people really want it in
> > Debian then by armel, but not by an armhf+armel hybrid which involves
> > supporting v6
On Tuesday 26 January 2016 08:24:16 Ian Campbell wrote:
> The Debian armhf kernels do not have support for ARMv6 enabled. AIUI
> moving to a v6+v7 capable kernel, other than muddying the waters WRT
> what "armhf" means, would also mean falling back to ARMv6 features only
> missing out on ARMv7
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 08:24:16AM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 17:59 +0100, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 05:39:40PM +0100, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> > > On Monday 25 January 2016 14:58:27 Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > > > As I got the
On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 15:46 +0100, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> > I wasn't aware that any of the RPi support (for any model) had gone
> > upstream.
>
> It has taken a while, but it seems that major parts are now upstream-ed.
> See the changelog mentioned earlier.
Great!
[...]
> As I got the
Thanks for your response :-)
On Monday 25 January 2016 13:23:20 Ian Campbell wrote:
> > I have a Raspberry Pi 1B, 1B+ and 2B and I'd love to test Debian's 4.4
> > kernel for it. At least it is/was my understanding that the versatile
> > kernel is meant for the Raspberry Pi.
>
> The versatile
On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 15:46 +0100, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> Thanks for your response :-)
>
> On Monday 25 January 2016 13:23:20 Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > I have a Raspberry Pi 1B, 1B+ and 2B and I'd love to test Debian's 4.4
> > > kernel for it. At least it is/was my understanding that the
On Sat, 2016-01-16 at 03:22 +0100, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have a Raspberry Pi 1B, 1B+ and 2B and I'd love to test Debian's 4.4 kernel
> for it. At least it is/was my understanding that the versatile kernel is
> meant
> for the Raspberry Pi.
The versatile kernel is meant for ARM
On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 14:56 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 15:46 +0100, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> > Thanks for your response :-)
> >
> > On Monday 25 January 2016 13:23:20 Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > > I have a Raspberry Pi 1B, 1B+ and 2B and I'd love to test Debian's
> > > >
On Monday 25 January 2016 15:07:50 Ian Campbell wrote:
> > The armmp kernel flavour should now support the BCM2836 and the Pi 2,
>
> I missed this going in, thanks!
>
> > but *not* the BCM2835. Also, Debian's armhf port is built for ARMv7
> > whereas the BCM2835 implements ARMv6. Most of the
On Monday 25 January 2016 14:58:27 Ian Campbell wrote:
> > As I got the impression that support for the RPi was now present in
> > upstream and (therefor) the Debian kernels,
>
> The "therefor" won't happen automatically, someone will need to file a
> wishlist bug asking for the relevant options
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 05:39:40PM +0100, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> On Monday 25 January 2016 14:58:27 Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > As I got the impression that support for the RPi was now present in
> > > upstream and (therefor) the Debian kernels,
> >
> > The "therefor" won't happen
Hi!
I have a Raspberry Pi 1B, 1B+ and 2B and I'd love to test Debian's 4.4 kernel
for it. At least it is/was my understanding that the versatile kernel is meant
for the Raspberry Pi.
But when I (globally) compare config-4.4.0-rc8-versatile with kernel configs
taken from my Pi's I see HUGE
18 matches
Mail list logo
