Package: lists.debian.org
Severity: normal
The debian-kernel-maint list has received nothing but spam and
unanswered user questions since February 2007, shortly after its
creation. In fact I wasn't aware of its existence until just
now when I scrolled down the list of lists fror developers
dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 10:47:58PM -0800, Jurij Smakov wrote:
I believe the original idea was to create d-k-m for discussions and
keep d-k as the address in maintainer field (and the primary contact
address for the user requests). This appears to be
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 10:47:58PM -0800, Jurij Smakov wrote:
I believe the original idea was to create d-k-m for discussions and
keep d-k as the address in maintainer field (and the primary contact
address for the user requests). This appears to be the most
straightforward way, as it
We've had debian-kernel-maint for a while now, but its never really
been used. Should we keep it around?
From what I understand, the reason for this list was to separate
kernel discussions from the bug noise. Since debian-kernel is still
listed as the maintainer, it seems to me that it makes more
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 11:56:17AM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
We've had debian-kernel-maint for a while now, but its never really
been used. Should we keep it around?
From what I understand, the reason for this list was to separate
kernel discussions from the bug noise. Since debian-kernel
5 matches
Mail list logo
