Re: linux-headers-2.6.33-2-amd64 (2.6.33-1~experimental.3) uninstallable

2010-04-12 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Sun, Apr 11 2010, maximilian attems wrote: On Sun, 11 Apr 2010, Manoj Srivastava wrote: The kernel team has made their level of commitment clear, as is proper. Indeed, I don't expect the kernel team to support either non-debian sources, nor _any_ third party modules, really.

Re: linux-headers-2.6.33-2-amd64 (2.6.33-1~experimental.3) uninstallable

2010-04-11 Thread Christian Hammers
Hello On Sat, 13 Mar 2010, M G Berberich wrote: It is meant as: “packages and tools which are still being developed, and are still in the alpha testing stage.“ It surely shouldn't be a trash-heap for packages that cannot even be installed, because someone forget to upload the dependies.

Re: linux-headers-2.6.33-2-amd64 (2.6.33-1~experimental.3) uninstallable

2010-04-11 Thread maximilian attems
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 12:33:42PM +0200, Christian Hammers wrote: A rather late reply to a mail I found in the archives... but regarding the usage claim, I would like to mention that people who use e.g. the nvidia binary driver do not have much fun with the experimental kernel images

Re: linux-headers-2.6.33-2-amd64 (2.6.33-1~experimental.3) uninstallable

2010-04-11 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Sun, Apr 11 2010, maximilian attems wrote: On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 12:33:42PM +0200, Christian Hammers wrote: A rather late reply to a mail I found in the archives... but regarding the usage claim, I would like to mention that people who use e.g. the nvidia binary driver do not have much

Re: linux-headers-2.6.33-2-amd64 (2.6.33-1~experimental.3) uninstallable

2010-04-11 Thread maximilian attems
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 10:13:15AM -0700, Manoj Srivastava wrote: Seriously, I use nvidia non-free drivers as well. I can affirm that I can pull from stable, or Linus' tree, and build kernel images and nvidia modules. My usual sequence of action is to yes indeed you lost *all* of

Re: linux-headers-2.6.33-2-amd64 (2.6.33-1~experimental.3) uninstallable

2010-04-11 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Sun, Apr 11 2010, maximilian attems wrote: On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 10:13:15AM -0700, Manoj Srivastava wrote: Seriously, I use nvidia non-free drivers as well. I can affirm that I can pull from stable, or Linus' tree, and build kernel images and nvidia modules. My usual sequence

Re: linux-headers-2.6.33-2-amd64 (2.6.33-1~experimental.3) uninstallable

2010-04-11 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sun, 2010-04-11 at 11:12 -0700, Manoj Srivastava wrote: On Sun, Apr 11 2010, maximilian attems wrote: On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 10:13:15AM -0700, Manoj Srivastava wrote: Seriously, I use nvidia non-free drivers as well. I can affirm that I can pull from stable, or Linus'

Re: linux-headers-2.6.33-2-amd64 (2.6.33-1~experimental.3) uninstallable

2010-04-11 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Sun, Apr 11 2010, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Sun, 2010-04-11 at 11:12 -0700, Manoj Srivastava wrote: On Sun, Apr 11 2010, maximilian attems wrote: On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 10:13:15AM -0700, Manoj Srivastava wrote: Seriously, I use nvidia non-free drivers as well. I can affirm

Re: linux-headers-2.6.33-2-amd64 (2.6.33-1~experimental.3) uninstallable

2010-04-11 Thread maximilian attems
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010, Manoj Srivastava wrote: The kernel team has made their level of commitment clear, as is proper. Indeed, I don't expect the kernel team to support either non-debian sources, nor _any_ third party modules, really. Which is why I directed the user to make-kpkg,

Re: linux-headers-2.6.33-2-amd64 (2.6.33-1~experimental.3) uninstallable

2010-03-13 Thread M G Berberich
Am Samstag, den 13. März schrieb maximilian attems: On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 10:30:42PM +0100, M G Berberich wrote: http://packages.debian.org/experimental/linux-headers-2.6.33-2-amd64 depends: linux-kbuild-2.6.33 Package not available and? what is the purpose of your

Re: linux-headers-2.6.33-2-amd64 (2.6.33-1~experimental.3) uninstallable

2010-03-13 Thread maximilian attems
On Sat, 13 Mar 2010, M G Berberich wrote: It is meant as: “packages and tools which are still being developed, and are still in the alpha testing stage.“ It surely shouldn't be a trash-heap for packages that cannot even be installed, because someone forget to upload the dependies.

Re: linux-headers-2.6.33-2-amd64 (2.6.33-1~experimental.3) uninstallable

2010-03-13 Thread M G Berberich
Am Samstag, den 13. März schrieb maximilian attems: On Sat, 13 Mar 2010, M G Berberich wrote: It is meant as: “packages and tools which are still being developed, and are still in the alpha testing stage.“ It surely shouldn't be a trash-heap for packages that cannot even be

Re: linux-headers-2.6.33-2-amd64 (2.6.33-1~experimental.3) uninstallable

2010-03-13 Thread maximilian attems
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 07:32:57PM +0100, M G Berberich wrote: I can't install the headers to the kernel, because linux-headers-2.6.33-2-amd64 depends on (not available) linux-kbuild-2.6.33 and the headers are neccessary to build modules for the kernel. And I don't see the benefit of

linux-headers-2.6.33-2-amd64 (2.6.33-1~experimental.3) uninstallable

2010-03-12 Thread M G Berberich
http://packages.debian.org/experimental/linux-headers-2.6.33-2-amd64 depends: linux-kbuild-2.6.33 Package not available MfG bmg -- „Des is völlig wurscht, was heut beschlos- | M G Berberich sen wird: I bin sowieso dagegn!“ |

Re: linux-headers-2.6.33-2-amd64 (2.6.33-1~experimental.3) uninstallable

2010-03-12 Thread maximilian attems
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 10:30:42PM +0100, M G Berberich wrote: http://packages.debian.org/experimental/linux-headers-2.6.33-2-amd64 depends: linux-kbuild-2.6.33 Package not available and? what is the purpose of your message? which part of the meaning experimental is