On Tue, 23 Aug 2011, maximilian attems wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 09:10:17PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton l...@lkcl.net (lkcl) reported bug
#636123, which then received a follow-up which is very clearly (to me)
this guy is adding to much noise, so that
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 16:03 -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Tue, 23 Aug 2011, maximilian attems wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 09:10:17PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton l...@lkcl.net (lkcl) reported bug
#636123, which then received a follow-up which is very
On Fri, 26 Aug 2011, Ben Hutchings wrote:
http://bugs.debian.org/636123#138
http://bugs.debian.org/636123#159
http://bugs.debian.org/636123#172
http://bugs.debian.org/638896#16
http://bugs.debian.org/638896#26
Ok. These aren't quite the smoking gun I was looking for, but they're
certainly
On Tuesday, August 23, 2011 9:37 PM Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 11:58:33PM +0300, Touko Korpela wrote:
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 08:05:26PM +, maximilian attems wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 09:10:17PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 09:10:17PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton l...@lkcl.net (lkcl) reported bug
#636123, which then received a follow-up which is very clearly (to me)
this guy is adding to much noise, so that various bug reports get
useless. if strong words didn't
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 08:05:26PM +, maximilian attems wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 09:10:17PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton l...@lkcl.net (lkcl) reported bug
#636123, which then received a follow-up which is very clearly (to me)
this guy is adding to much
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 11:58:33PM +0300, Touko Korpela wrote:
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 08:05:26PM +, maximilian attems wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 09:10:17PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton l...@lkcl.net (lkcl) reported bug
#636123, which then received a
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton l...@lkcl.net (lkcl) reported bug
#636123, which then received a follow-up which is very clearly (to me)
a different bug. He insists on asking the second submitter to
investigate things as if the second bug is the same as his bug, while
I have asked the second
I notice that bug #636123 is currently assigned to src:linux-2.6,
although it may be a bug in initramfs-tools. In any case, both packages
are maintained by the kernel team.
Ben.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
9 matches
Mail list logo
