Re: new kernel-package breaks official linux-2.6 kernel builds, should not propagate to testing.

2005-11-09 Thread Manoj Srivastava
1. the missing config caues manuals not to build ,[ Manual page make-kpkg(1) ] | DESCRIPTION | This manual page explains the Debian make-kpkg utility, which is | used to create the kernel related Debian packages. This utility | needs to be run from a top level Linux kernel source

Re: new kernel-package breaks official linux-2.6 kernel builds, should not propagate to testing.

2005-11-09 Thread Horms
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1. the missing config caues manuals not to build ,[ Manual page make-kpkg(1) ] | DESCRIPTION | This manual page explains the Debian make-kpkg utility, which is | used to create the kernel related Debian packages. This utility |

Re: new kernel-package breaks official linux-2.6 kernel builds, should not propagate to testing.

2005-11-09 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 02:03:15 + (UTC), Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1. the missing config caues manuals not to build ,[ Manual page make-kpkg(1) ] | DESCRIPTION | This manual page explains the Debian make-kpkg utility, which is | used

Re: new kernel-package breaks official linux-2.6 kernel builds, should not propagate to testing.

2005-11-09 Thread Horms
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: With the new, streamlined, internal dependency mechanisms, it is actually going to be a big kludge not to require the configure target in the dependency path (since the dependency path has been separated from actual make commands for targets).

new kernel-package breaks official linux-2.6 kernel builds, should not propagate to testing.

2005-11-08 Thread Sven Luther
Package: kernel-package Version: 10.008 Severity: grave As discussed on irc, the new 10.008 kernel-package was prematurely uploaded to unstable, and breaks linux-2.6 builds. The issues at hand are : 1. the missing config caues manuals not to build 2. the headers build binaries