On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 08:57:04PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Christian T. Steigies ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050416 00:30]:
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 02:38:15PM +0900, Horms wrote:
Right now I'd like to build from kernel-tree 2.4.27-10, thanks
I finally updated the m68k packages to use
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 02:38:15PM +0900, Horms wrote:
I looked at malo and voltaire, both seem to be busy, presumably
acting as buildds, and there is also the problem of installing
kernel-tree, as I don't have root. In short, if you could make a machine
available that would be most excellent.
* Christian T. Steigies ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050416 00:30]:
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 02:38:15PM +0900, Horms wrote:
Right now I'd like to build from kernel-tree 2.4.27-10, thanks
I finally updated the m68k packages to use the kernel-tree package. If I
want to upload this, built against
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 02:38:15PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 08:35:02AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
I looked at malo and voltaire, both seem to be busy, presumably
acting as buildds, and there is also the problem of installing
kernel-tree, as I don't have root. In short, if you
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 02:38:15PM +0900, Horms wrote:
Right now I'd like to build from kernel-tree 2.4.27-10, thanks
I finally updated the m68k packages to use the kernel-tree package. If I
want to upload this, built against k-t-2.4.27-9 (or 10?), these packages
should not go into sarge? Did
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 08:35:02AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 01:53:28PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 10:12:39AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 05:04:20PM +0900, Horms wrote:
[snip]
Are there debian machines that are
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 06:59:09AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 12:38:31PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 08:35:02AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
I may be able to provide a pegasos box to whoever decides to take over
this
burden, but can't promise
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 12:38:31PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 08:35:02AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
I may be able to provide a pegasos box to whoever decides to take over
this
burden, but can't promise anything. Do you volunteer for that ?
I am happy to build
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 01:53:28PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 10:12:39AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 05:04:20PM +0900, Horms wrote:
[snip]
Are there debian machines that are suitable for doing such a build
should the need arise? It seems that
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 01:53:28PM +0900, Horms wrote:
Ok, I'll try and be a little more specific. Do you know of any
machines that are available to kernel team members, or more
generally debian developers, to do ppc builds?
trick.rz.uni-augsburg.de, a power5 machine, is open on request.
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 10:32:01AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 01:53:28PM +0900, Horms wrote:
Ok, I'll try and be a little more specific. Do you know of any
machines that are available to kernel team members, or more
generally debian developers, to do ppc builds?
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 10:12:39AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 05:04:20PM +0900, Horms wrote:
[snip]
Are there debian machines that are suitable for doing such a build
should the need arise? It seems that if it is just a matter of running
a build and watching bugs,
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 12:13:31AM +0300, Eddy Petrisor wrote:
Sven Luther wrote:
Hello,
[..]
Plans on my part for 2.6 powerpc kernels are :
1) abandonement of the ppc32 power3 and power4 kernels in favour of ppc64
variants.
mkay, this looks bad to my eyes.
Does this mean
Sven Luther wrote:
Hello,
[..]
Plans on my part for 2.6 powerpc kernels are :
1) abandonement of the ppc32 power3 and power4 kernels in favour of ppc64
variants.
mkay, this looks bad to my eyes.
Does this mean that there is no more support for these variants in
upstream, also? I have a
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 08:41:58AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Hello,
It seems as the 2.4.27 and 2.6.8 kernels which are sarge release candidates
are now frozen, and will be part of sarge as is, complete with all the bugs
and problems present in them, and maybe even some security issues which
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 03:15:00PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 08:41:58AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Hello,
It seems as the 2.4.27 and 2.6.8 kernels which are sarge release candidates
are now frozen, and will be part of sarge as is, complete with all the bugs
and
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 09:03:01AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 03:15:00PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 08:41:58AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Hello,
It seems as the 2.4.27 and 2.6.8 kernels which are sarge release
candidates
are now frozen,
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 05:04:20PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 09:03:01AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 03:15:00PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 08:41:58AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Hello,
It seems as the 2.4.27 and 2.6.8 kernels
Hello,
It seems as the 2.4.27 and 2.6.8 kernels which are sarge release candidates
are now frozen, and will be part of sarge as is, complete with all the bugs
and problems present in them, and maybe even some security issues which will
not be fixed in d-i, but only in
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 08:41:58AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Hello,
It seems as the 2.4.27 and 2.6.8 kernels which are sarge release candidates
are now frozen, and will be part of sarge as is, complete with all the bugs
and problems present in them, and maybe even some security issues which
On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 09:58 +0200, Gabriel Paubert wrote:
As I said above, some embedded CPU really need different mm handling.
BookE is an abomination, and fun with the 64 bit BookE implemetations
if they come one day: they use different instruction encoding than
standard PPC64.
I think the
Dropping debian-boot, as i don't think further discussion concerns them.
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 09:58:05AM +0200, Gabriel Paubert wrote:
Plans on my part for 2.6 powerpc kernels are :
1) abandonement of the ppc32 power3 and power4 kernels in favour of ppc64
variants.
Fine, I
22 matches
Mail list logo
