Bug#294349: kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686: Unable to mount USB2.0 drives with default .config

2005-02-09 Thread jgiemail-debian
Package: kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686 Version: 2.6.10-4 Severity: normal Dear Debian Kernel Developers, Using kernel-image-2.6.10-i-686 from Debian, I am not able to use my USB 2.0 Flash drive. Upon plugging in the USB 2.0 Flash Drive, I am not able to mount it, and dmesg shows errors: usb 5-5:

Re: purpose of kernel-tree packages

2005-02-09 Thread dann frazier
On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 00:24 +0100, martin f krafft wrote: I am wondering what the purpose of the kernel-tree packages is. Here's a snippet of a doc I wrote for work some time ago - hopefully others will jump in if there are inaccuracies. kernel-tree kernel-patch-debian

Re: purpose of kernel-tree packages

2005-02-09 Thread martin f krafft
Thanks for the doc, Dann. However, I think you will still agree with me that the control description for kernel-tree packages is largely false and misguiding. I propose the following instead: Description: Linux kernel source tree for building Debian kernel images This meta package is used

Re: Bug#294303: hotplug: Bad NET invocation: $INTERFACE is not set

2005-02-09 Thread Horms
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 02:22:26PM +0100, Artur R. Czechowski wrote: On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 07:47:25PM +0900, Horms wrote: On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 02:25:55AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: On Feb 09, Artur R. Czechowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've got following message when modprobing

Re: purpose of kernel-tree packages

2005-02-09 Thread dann frazier
On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 02:35 +0100, martin f krafft wrote: Thanks for the doc, Dann. However, I think you will still agree with me that the control description for kernel-tree packages is largely false and misguiding. I propose the following instead: Description: Linux kernel source tree

Bug#294396: kernel-kbuild-2.6-3 - does not support kernel images without symbol versions

2005-02-09 Thread Horms
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 03:58:44PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: Package: kernel-kbuild-2.6-3 Version: 2.6.8-2 Severity: grave The supplied Makefile.modpost does not support kernel images without symbols versions as used by s390. Hi, This seems like another reason why the files supplied by

Re: purpose of kernel-tree packages

2005-02-09 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.02.10.0249 +0100]: The package serves no purpose outside of the Debian build and archive infrastructure. Sounds good to me, though I am slightly dubious about the last paragraph. Well, can you think of a use outside of the offfical archive?

Re: purpose of kernel-tree packages

2005-02-09 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.02.10.0235 +0100]: somewhere public, just never have). I just posted it in our wiki: http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianKernelTree Much appreciated! http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianKernel http://wiki.debian.net/?Kernel Anyone know why that