On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 08:31:50AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
You are not interested in recordying the debian abi number, or the flavour as
a subset of the architecture used ? This seems like interesting info.
KLive wasn't originally designed to track distro packages, but mainline
or/and
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 08:25:46AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 05:43:47PM -0800, obi wrote:
radeonfb: Retreived PLL infos from BIOS
radeonfb: Reference=27.00 MHz (RefDiv=12) Memory=252.00 Mhz, System=200.00
MHz
and this is what rovclock -i ells
Reference
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 08:48:20AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
You could simply add the two distro-specific information, the full package
name (2.6.14-2-amd64-k8) and the distro version number (2.6.14-7). I guess
in additional often-intrusive patches, and will probably use a meaningful
name. it
Hi,
at least I lost track a bit, so this mail is basically a question to
bring me up to speed.
In 2004, there was a GR that decided to put everything in main under the
DFSG. We had some discussions, but in the end, the result was that all
the non-free firmware bits have to be removed from main
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 12:15:45AM -0800, obi wrote:
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 08:25:46AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 05:43:47PM -0800, obi wrote:
radeonfb: Retreived PLL infos from BIOS
radeonfb: Reference=27.00 MHz (RefDiv=12) Memory=252.00 Mhz,
System=200.00 MHz
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 10:12:12AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 12:15:45AM -0800, obi wrote:
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 08:25:46AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 05:43:47PM -0800, obi wrote:
radeonfb: Retreived PLL infos from BIOS
radeonfb:
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 10:04:45AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
Hi,
at least I lost track a bit, so this mail is basically a question to
bring me up to speed.
In 2004, there was a GR that decided to put everything in main under the
DFSG. We had some discussions, but in the end, the result
* Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060108 11:12]:
There where two fully independent issues here :
1) some (many) of those firmware using modules had a sloppy licencing
situation, which meant the compiled kernels where indeed non-distributable.
2) those firmware blurbs come without
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 11:52:20AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060108 11:12]:
There where two fully independent issues here :
1) some (many) of those firmware using modules had a sloppy licencing
situation, which meant the compiled kernels where
Hi folks
I implemented an infrastructure for module packages (including
linux-nonfree-2.6). It is similar to the gencontrol[1] mechanism used in
linux-2.6, in fact it reuses most of the code.
It provides currently the following (in the linux-headers-2.6.15
package):
- A copy of debian/arch, e.g.
Hi,
* Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060108 14:00]:
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 11:52:20AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
What needs to be done to get the infrastructure ready? Do you think it
might make sense to try to get it done e.g. at a BSP?
waldi is working on it, and it is on our todo
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 04:04:33PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
What we as release team really need is some statement from the
maintainers team like we have done some thorough search through the
sources, and are sure that the reminder is now DFSG-free (according to
the changed DFSG). We usually
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.15-1
I can't get online resizing of ext3 to work. The kernel spits out
EXT3-fs: Unrecognized mount option resize=1572864 or missing value
when I try to remount the filesystem, supplying the resize option.
Documentation/filesystems/ext3.txt says it
* Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060108 17:00]:
So, now, what are you going to do about it, remove the kernel from main and
into non-free :)
As this is a release blocker, not release until this is fixed? (And try
to search for someone who can work on this issue, perhaps also say
something in
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 05:14:02PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060108 17:00]:
So, now, what are you going to do about it, remove the kernel from main and
into non-free :)
As this is a release blocker, not release until this is fixed? (And try
to search
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I got the same error with 2.6.14. The kernel was assigning network
devices randomly on boot despite hard coding them in /etc/modutils/local
with:
alias eth0 via-rhine
alias eth1 8139too
Upgrading to 2.6.15 fixed the error, however I also
* Tore Anderson
I can't get online resizing of ext3 to work.
After some more debugging it seems that the resize option isn't
correctly parsed by fs/ext3/super.c. Patch attached. However, I'm not
too sure if it is correct, right now my mount process is hanging in
blocking I/O state, and
Hallo,
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 11:10:46AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 10:04:45AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
Now, my question is: Is there still work open? If so, what? Or is the
current removal of firmware enough, and we can relax on this topic?
From my point of
Hello,
I would like to propose a schedule for the next upload of
linux-2.6 version 2.6.15-2:
I would like to make the dinstall run on tuesday, so everything should
be committed and tested until tuesday noontime UTC.
Looking at the changelog, there are quiet a few bugs this upload will
close,
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 10:03:17PM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote:
If someone needs more time to implement changes which must go into -2,
please reply accordingly.
I have a few changes I need to make for parisc configs (DISCONTIGMEM
didn't get enabled on the 64-bit configs for some reason).
* Bastian Blank
Stock linux does not support online resizing of ext3.
It does (since 2.6.10). I've successfully extended mounted ext3 file
systems using ext2online from ext2resize 1.1.19-3 on an unmodified
2.6.15-1-k7.
However the more I've looked into it, the more certain I've become
Your message dated Sun, 8 Jan 2006 22:18:58 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#346511: ext3 online resizing doesn't work
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 10:03:17PM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote:
I would like to make the dinstall run on tuesday, so everything should
be committed and tested until tuesday noontime UTC.
will fix the buslogic patch till then.
and expect an klibc upload tommorrow.
--
maks
--
To
On Sunday 08 January 2006 21:03, Frederik Schueler wrote:
Hello,
I would like to propose a schedule for the next upload of
linux-2.6 version 2.6.15-2:
I would like to make the dinstall run on tuesday, so everything should
be committed and tested until tuesday noontime UTC.
Looking at the
Hallo,
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 10:23:54PM +, David Goodenough wrote:
Could you put in the change that was in the hostap-source since
2003 and is not in the in kernel version of hostap. Line 31 (a #define)
is commented in hostap_config.h. If it is uncommented then hostap will be
able to
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 09:50:47PM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote:
Hallo,
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 11:10:46AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 10:04:45AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
Now, my question is: Is there still work open? If so, what? Or is the
current removal of
Your message dated Sun, 8 Jan 2006 23:53:13 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Fwd: Re: Bug#268583: hotplug failure with shpchp and pciehp
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Sun, 8 Jan 2006 23:53:13 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Fwd: Re: Bug#268583: hotplug failure with shpchp and pciehp
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
reassign 346281 linux-image-2.6.15-1-686
thanks
Hi
On Fri, 06 Jan 2006 20:23:33 +0100, Ludovic Rousseau [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Package: linux-image-2.6.15-1-686 Version: 2.6.15-1 Severity: normal
I installed linux-headers-2.6.15-1-686 and then
linux-image-2.6.15-1-686 and I get the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 346281 linux-image-2.6.15-1-686
Bug#346281: linux-image-2.6.15-1-686: debconf question about
/lib/modules/2.6.15-1-686 even if no kernel is installed
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-package' to `linux-image-2.6.15-1-686'.
--
Stopping
Package: linux-image-2.6.14-2-686
Version: 2.6.14-7
I have ALC880. When turn on machine it works fine. kern.log:
Jan 9 03:20:07 newarrow kernel: hda_codec: Unknown model for ALC880, trying
auto-probe from BIOS...
Jan 9 03:20:07 newarrow kernel: hda_codec: Cannot set up configuration from
IJYTS that I've expereinced this bug and that it corrupted my root
file system. However, it only happened under some very unique
circumstances.
I reinstalled from sarge DVD's, then upgraded to etch pacakges. I then
restored my original /etc (which I backed up to a separate partition)
and
Package: kernel-headers-2.6
Severity: minor
With this package installed, when you include sys/params.h in your
program, you will get a severe namespace pollution since
linux/autoconf.h indirectly gets included and it #undefs all sort of
CONFIG_ preprocessor macros (e.g. ELinks using CONFIG_IPV6
Hello,
I am interested in room.I am based in UK but temporarily in France on a
contract job with a MISSIONARY group as a humanitarian.I will be having some
seminars coming up soon in the canada and My next programme/seminars will be in
the Canada.I will be needing a room to stay for this
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 339562 linux-2.6
Bug#339562: Strace is broken for kernels 2.6.13 and newer on sparc
Bug reassigned from package `strace' to `linux-2.6'.
tags 339562 pending
Bug#339562: Strace is broken for kernels 2.6.13 and newer on sparc
There were no tags
Package: linux-image-2.6.15-1-k7
Version: 2.6.15-1-k7-1
System hangs on send/revc data with dialup connection. Simply connect
with a dialup connection (configured with pppconfig, connected with
pon), open a Firefox browser window and open few tabs. System hangs.
Sometimes I have the same
Your message dated Sun, 8 Jan 2006 23:40:50 -0800 (PST)
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Fixed version is in sid, closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
37 matches
Mail list logo
