Le Mer 15 Mars 2006 03:01, Andres Salomon a écrit :
Hi,
I am going through the expulsion process to have Sven Luther removed
from the project. The process is outlined here:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/08/msg5.html
, and I have already completed step 1.
I strongly
Le mardi 14 mars 2006 à 21:01 -0500, Andres Salomon a écrit :
Hi,
I am going through the expulsion process to have Sven Luther removed
from the project.
If this is a joke, it's not funny. I happen to prefer Andrew Suffield's
humour.
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' :
I just posted a patch on the linux-usb-devel mailing list. Please
check it out.
Nice!
In the meantime, I've plugged the keyboard in a PS/2 plug with an adapter I
had. It works fine.
--
PS: Remove invalid from the email address string if you expect a reply.
Mathieu Roy
+
| Thalie :
Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know Sven may sometimes be a bit overpresent in some trolls, he also=20
may answer too quick, without having read the mail he answers to=20
correctly enough. But AFAICT, I've always seen him apologies when he=20
did so (I can provide links if you
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006, Andres Salomon wrote:
Hi,
Hi!
I am going through the expulsion process to have Sven Luther removed
from the project.
Hahaha oh wow. You got it the wrong way, you should only do that
_after_ someone posts http://zoy.org/~sam/ftwcal.jpeg to d-d-a. Now I
have no
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 09:01:09PM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
I am going through the expulsion process to have Sven Luther removed
from the project. The process is outlined here:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/08/msg5.html,
and I have already completed step 1.
This
Mike Bird [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your accusation fails to allege sufficient facts to constitute
an allegation of defamation.
The facts have previously been discussed elsewhere. I replied merely to
point out that Sven does not always apologise for his behaviour.
Rather than wasting list
On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 11:25 +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
Le Mer 15 Mars 2006 03:01, Andres Salomon a écrit :
Hi,
I am going through the expulsion process to have Sven Luther removed
from the project. The process is outlined here:
The DAM has accepted the request; please send seconds directly to
[EMAIL PROTECTED], cc'ing me as well.
For the people who seem to think that there are more constructive ways
of dealing w/ this issue rather than the expulsion process:
http://squishy.cc/svenl.txt
This is a lot from two weeks
I use cifs to mount a couple of samba shares and files with long names are not
displayed. When I access the same shares, using LAN Browsing in konqueror, the
files are there. It looks like it has too do with the total length (inclusive
directories) of the filename. for example:
Your message dated Wed, 15 Mar 2006 06:47:13 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#339092: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.55b
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Wed, 15 Mar 2006 06:47:13 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#352738: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.55b
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Wed, 15 Mar 2006 06:47:13 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#354708: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.55b
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Wed, 15 Mar 2006 06:47:13 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#355162: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.55b
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Wed, 15 Mar 2006 06:47:13 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#355486: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.55b
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Wed, 15 Mar 2006 06:47:13 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#355595: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.55b
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Wed, 15 Mar 2006 06:47:13 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#356850: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.55b
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
waldi added s390 support to initramfs-tools as of version 0.54.
0.55 is in incoming.debian.org and should be available in unstable soon.
klibc-1.2.4-1 has an important s390 fix.
so testing those releases are highly welcome.
you can rebuild your initramfs after installation of aboves packages with
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 09:01:09PM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
Some might argue that we should just kick him from the channel and
remove his commit access to the debian-kernel project, but that does not
solve the problem of him abusing other teams, as well as his abusive
mailing list posts.
Pierre Habouzit writes:
I strongly oppose to such an expulsion.
So do I.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Mar 14, martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What what about initramfs-tools adding the conflict?
Why? It does nicely with busybox-cvs-static. udev can't deal with
it.
busybox-cvs-static providing a broken shell could be a good reason.
Le Mer 15 Mars 2006 15:05, Andres Salomon a écrit :
On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 11:25 +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
Le Mer 15 Mars 2006 03:01, Andres Salomon a écrit :
Hi,
I am going through the expulsion process to have Sven Luther
removed from the project. The process is outlined here:
On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 05:00, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know Sven may sometimes be a bit overpresent in some trolls, he also=20
may answer too quick, without having read the mail he answers to=20
correctly enough. But AFAICT, I've always seen him
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 01:00:19PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know Sven may sometimes be a bit overpresent in some trolls, he also=20
may answer too quick, without having read the mail he answers to=20
correctly enough. But AFAICT, I've always
On 3/14/06, Andres Salomon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am going through the expulsion process to have Sven Luther removed
from the project. The process is outlined here:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/08/msg5.html,
and I have already completed step 1.
[ Andres,
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 05:56:05PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
I was a bit short on you, because you started to make noise about the reason
for the refusal being a #include being wrongly placed in the patch, and a
printk that was not strictly necessary, which i think for someone like you or
the
initramfs-tools_0.55b_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
initramfs-tools_0.55b.dsc
initramfs-tools_0.55b.tar.gz
initramfs-tools_0.55b_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Accepted:
initramfs-tools_0.55b.dsc
to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.55b.dsc
initramfs-tools_0.55b.tar.gz
to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.55b.tar.gz
initramfs-tools_0.55b_all.deb
to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.55b_all.deb
Announcing to
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 05:56:10PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 05:56:05PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
I was a bit short on you, because you started to make noise about the reason
for the refusal being a #include being wrongly placed in the patch, and a
printk that
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 09:40:15AM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
The DAM has accepted the request; please send seconds directly to
[EMAIL PROTECTED], cc'ing me as well.
For the people who seem to think that there are more constructive ways
of dealing w/ this issue rather than the expulsion
Hi,
I got the same problem again, and it seems it has been caused by yet
another update of initramfs-tools, as there's a 0.53c version in my
/var/cache/apt/archives
The problem is that this time I don't have the other kernel image to
boot. So, I'm writing this from a boot from an old Knoppix
also sprach Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.03.15.1512 +0100]:
It seems that the project is splitting in two groups basically:
The people that wants to work together and release Etch, and the
people that with a reason or not wants to see it delayed. The
minute after the release team
On Wednesday 15 March 2006 08:40, Andres Salomon wrote:
The DAM has accepted the request; please send seconds directly to
[EMAIL PROTECTED], cc'ing me as well.
For the people who seem to think that there are more constructive
ways of dealing w/ this issue rather than the expulsion process:
Hi,
Do you finally resolve this problem because I have exactly the same
problem and searching the solution.
Thanks
Cécile
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi
Running the latest Knoppix with a 2.6.12 kernel doesn't help. Please
let me know what I can do to get my system booting again...
Thanks in advance.
--
Grtjs,
Manuel
PS: http://manuel.msxnet.org/
Hi,
2006/3/15, maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
do you use lilo?
Yes I do.
if yes fetch 0.55 from incoming.debian.org or unstable.
But, will it be able to update my initrd.img via the chroot?
As you have read, I'm having loads of trouble with that.
did you get dropped to a shell,
No,
On Wednesday 15 March 2006 08:40, Andres Salomon wrote:
The DAM has accepted the request; please send seconds directly to
[EMAIL PROTECTED], cc'ing me as well.
For the people who seem to think that there are more constructive
ways of dealing w/ this issue rather than the expulsion process:
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 11:00:43PM +0100, Philippe Bourcier wrote:
Package: linux-image-2.6-686
Version: 2.6.15-8
Followup-For: Bug #348782
hi all,
debian 2.6.15-8 doesn't resolve:
I have a scsi tower (2*dd, cdrom reader, cdrom burner) connected to my
laptop with a pcmcia card:
Hi again,
Some more info:
2006/3/15, maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
if yes fetch 0.55 from incoming.debian.org or unstable.
Unstable has 0.53c and in incoming.debian.org I only see one file REPORT.
So, I have no idea how to get it.
--
Grtjs,
Manuel
PS: http://manuel.msxnet.org/
Hi,
I'm getting rather desperate: would it be useful to do a
apt-get install --reinstall linux-image-2.6.15-1-k7
from the chroot?
2006/3/15, Manuel Bilderbeek [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi again,
Some more info:
2006/3/15, maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
if yes fetch 0.55 from
Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
Hi Moritz,
On Wednesday, 15 Mar 2006, you wrote:
Frans Pop wrote:
On Wednesday 15 March 2006 00:15, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
The update is built and tested, it'll appear soon. It contains three
ABI changing security fixes, so the ABI will be bumped. I
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006, Manuel Bilderbeek wrote:
Hi, resending because of wrong address.
thanks sorry for the typo
2006/3/15, maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
do you use lilo?
Yes I do.
ok so that's the bug you hit, it's closed by 0.55b
lilo doesn't grog that the initd.img changed
Hi,
2006/3/15, maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
ok so that's the bug you hit, it's closed by 0.55b
lilo doesn't grog that the initd.img changed without beeing rerun
grub is much friendlier in those regards.
So I've read.
yes you need
a) proc from outside the chroot or maybe it's enough
Andres Salomon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I strongly oppose to such an expulsion.
It amazes me that people oppose expulsion, but are perfectly happy to
allow the DAMs to decide whether or not a NM is to be let into the
project. Why do we trust the DAM's judgement in one scenario but not
the
martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
also sprach Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.03.15.1512 +0100]:
It seems that the project is splitting in two groups basically:
The people that wants to work together and release Etch, and the
people that with a reason or not wants to see it
Your message dated Wed, 15 Mar 2006 22:36:01 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line linux-image-2.6.15-1-686: the power off button does not work
anymore
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
severity 355580 normal
tags 355580 moreinfo
stop
On Mon, 06 Mar 2006, Moshe Yudkowsky wrote:
Three problems: no installation of module; no loading of linear module
in md; using mdrun in scripts/local-top/md give incorrect md modules.
ok.
The hook function manual_add_modules uses modprobe
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 355580 normal
Bug#355580: initramfs-tools: fails to load required modules, boot fails
Severity set to `normal'.
tags 355580 moreinfo
Bug#355580: initramfs-tools: fails to load required modules, boot fails
Tags were: patch
Tags added: moreinfo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear Friends,
First of all i apologise for my poor english (portuguese :-))
I follow de dev lists of debian for several months now, my knowlege in
linux whas not so good so i never applyed to be a developper and also
my time isnt much :-(.
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 10:59:46AM -0500, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
snip/
So far, I have never took the time to study the detail of the expulsion
process, so sorry if this mail is inappropriate. But be sure that I will
do everything I can as a DD to stop Sven's expulsion.
Here another DD
#include hallo.h
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Wed, Mar 15 2006, 01:32:41PM]:
I have no dog in this fight, and I do not take sides, but Debian
needs good developers it seems that some developers want to drive
as many people out of Debian as possible. At this rate Debian will
cease to be revelant,
Hi Moritz,
On Wednesday, 15 Mar 2006, you wrote:
Hi Moritz,
On Wednesday, 15 Mar 2006, you wrote:
Frans Pop wrote:
On Wednesday 15 March 2006 00:15, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
The update is built and tested, it'll appear soon. It contains three
ABI changing security fixes, so the
Package: linux-image-2.6.15-1-k7-smp
Version: 2.6.15-8
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
after I install of linux-image 2.6.15-1-k7-smp (or 2.6.15-1-k7 or even
2.6.15-1-486) and reboot
i can no longer use keyboard or mouse.
I must log in from ssh.
this is very
53 matches
Mail list logo
