Package: linux-image-2.6.18-2-xen-686
Version: 2.6.18-5
While using the above mentioned kernel, I get an oops when the link on eth1
fails:
BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address
printing eip:
c02855ba
*pde = ma pa f000
Oops: 0002 [#1]
Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 08:50:38PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
when I build linux-2.6 I would like to use both my cpus. So I set
CONCURRENCY_LEVEL=2.
| $ grep CONCURRENCY_LEVEL -r debian
| ./debian/rules.real: setup_env_kpkg_jobs =
Package: linux-source-2.6.18
Severity: normal
Hello,
Could you please enable Extend Attributes for ACLs on CIFS filesystem?
Thanks.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/boot$ grep CIFS_XATTR config-2.6.18-2-amd64
# CONFIG_CIFS_XATTR is not set
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers testing
Can you please try building a kernel with attached patch, and see
if
it improves the situtation in any way?
I confirm that this patch fixes sunhme driver (modulo missing
semicolon in pci_set_master line), many thanks for your work.
Regards
Michal Pokrywka
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Did you disable TCP/UDP checksumming?
http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenFaq#head-4ce9767df34fe1c9cf4f85f7e07cb10110eae9b7
Regards,
Abel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
retitle 388350 Add USB eject patch from Ubuntu
Bug#388350: Nautilus fails to unmount IPod
Changed Bug title.
reassign 388350 linux-image-2.6.18-2-686
Bug#388350: Add USB eject patch
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-2-686
Version: 2.6.18-5
Severity: normal
Hi,
Ejecting a Cardman 4040 reader freezes my system. A cold boot is the
only way out.
I'm using the cm4040_cs kernel module.
Regards,
Serge
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers unstable
APT policy:
This still hangs with noacpi on the command line after a random number
of hours after boot, and my BIOS has no option to disable ACPI. So sadly
this kernel is unusable on my system.
Cheers,
Dominic.
--
Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/
PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li
On Monday, 20 November 2006, you (dann frazier) wrote:
Please see if you can reproduce with the 2.6.18 kernel in sid. Etch
will ship with 2.6.18, 2.6.17 packages are no longer maintained.
I could reproduce:
$ dpkg -l linux-image* | grep ^.i
ii linux-image-2.6-686 2.6.17+2 Linux
Hello,
I hope this is the right place to ask this question, please forgive me if it
isn't.
Is there any chance that another linux-image-2.6 flavour would be added to the
list of the Debian standard packages?
I'd like to have vserver-686-bigmem, and/or xen-vserver-686-bigmem available.
The
Package: kernel-image-2.6-686
Severity: important
Justification: fails to build from source
After compiling NDISWRAPPER (version 1.28-1), the following warning is
shown:
*** WARNING: This kernel seems to use 4K stack size option
(CONFIG_4KSTACKS); many Windows drivers will not work with this
Accepted:
linux-2.6_2.6.18-6.diff.gz
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.18-6.diff.gz
linux-2.6_2.6.18-6.dsc
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.18-6.dsc
linux-doc-2.6.18_2.6.18-6_all.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-doc-2.6.18_2.6.18-6_all.deb
Your message dated Thu, 23 Nov 2006 19:31:53 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#398172: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.18-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 23 Nov 2006 19:31:53 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#353079: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.18-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 23 Nov 2006 19:31:53 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#386872: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.18-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 23 Nov 2006 19:31:53 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#382298: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.18-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 23 Nov 2006 19:31:53 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#382298: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.18-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 23 Nov 2006 20:53:51 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#400081: kernel-image-2.6-686: 4k stack size option
prevents usage of NDISWRAPPER
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Thu, 23 Nov 2006 19:31:53 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#394690: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.18-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 23 Nov 2006 19:31:53 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#395882: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.18-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 23 Nov 2006 19:31:53 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#397946: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.18-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 23 Nov 2006 19:31:53 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#386872: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.18-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 23 Nov 2006 19:31:53 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#396375: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.18-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Thu, 23 Nov 2006 19:31:53 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#394690: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.18-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package:usplash
Version: 0.3e
Usertags: debian-edu@lists.debian.org
usplash fail at boot with the error
bogl_init failed: /dev/fb0 no such file or directory
I am not sure what should be responsible for creating that device at boottime, but this worked for me.
adding a line saying
mknod
reassign 400097 initramfs-tools
Ronny Aasen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Package:usplash
Version: 0.3e
Usertags: debian-edu@lists.debian.org
usplash fail at boot with the error
bogl_init failed: /dev/fb0 no such file or directory
I am not sure what should be responsible for creating that
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 400097 initramfs-tools
Bug#400097: missing /dev/fb0 makes usplash fail
Bug reassigned from package `usplash' to `initramfs-tools'.
Ronny Aasen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
Package:usplash
Otavio Salvador wrote:
reassign 400097 initramfs-tools
Ronny Aasen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Package:usplash
Version: 0.3e
Usertags: debian-edu@lists.debian.org
usplash fail at boot with the error
bogl_init failed: /dev/fb0 no such file or directory
I am not sure what should be
28 matches
Mail list logo
