Bug#442103: initramfs-tools: update-initramfs fails with lilo and a degraded raid1 array

2008-01-06 Thread Jens Thiele
maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: as debian supports partial upgrades and initramfs-tools is not gonna start depend on lilo this inocation can only be used after Lenny release. marking as wontfix. Let me see if I got you right: You want to mark it as wontfix because older versions

Bug#459445: initramfs-tools: update-initramfs does not consider latest kernel by default

2008-01-06 Thread Julien Valroff
Package: initramfs-tools Version: 0.91d Severity: normal Hi, when running update-initramfs without specifying a kernel version (-k), the default version should be the latest kernel version (according to manpage). It is not in my case: $ ls /var/lib/initramfs-tools/ 2.6.22-3-amd64

Bug#459445: initramfs-tools: update-initramfs does not consider latest kernel by default

2008-01-06 Thread Julien Valroff
Le dimanche 06 janvier 2008 à 19:18 +0100, maximilian attems a écrit : when running update-initramfs without specifying a kernel version (-k), the default version should be the latest kernel version (according to manpage). It is not in my case: $ ls /var/lib/initramfs-tools/

Bug#442103: initramfs-tools: update-initramfs fails with lilo and a degraded raid1 array

2008-01-06 Thread maximilian attems
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 04:00:39PM +0100, Jens Thiele wrote: Let me see if I got you right: You want to mark it as wontfix because older versions of lilo do not provide -H = if one adds -H to the lilo invocations in update-initramfs there might be problems during update from etch? Maybe we

Bug#459445: initramfs-tools: update-initramfs does not consider latest kernel by default

2008-01-06 Thread maximilian attems
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 07:50:02PM +0100, Julien Valroff wrote: Le dimanche 06 janvier 2008 à 19:18 +0100, maximilian attems a écrit : when running update-initramfs without specifying a kernel version (-k), the default version should be the latest kernel version (according to

Processed: severity of 457044 is important

2008-01-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11 severity 457044 important Bug#457044: My box didn't reboot after upgrading linux-image-2.6.18-4-686 Severity set to `important' from `critical' End of message, stopping processing

Processed: severity of 458429 is important

2008-01-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11 severity 458429 important Bug#458429: linux-image-2.6.23-1-amd64: CPU#1 stuck for 11s [wpa_supplicant: 2857] Severity set to `important' from `critical' End of message, stopping

Bug#458429: linux-image-2.6.23-1-amd64: CPU#1 stuck for 11s [wpa_supplicant: 2857]

2008-01-06 Thread maximilian attems
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007, Gerard Robin wrote: At the boot, after this line: DHCPDISCOVER on ath0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 I get: Bug soft lokup CPU1# stuck for 11s [wpa_supplicant: 2857] -8--- and my box freezes ... The problem doesn't arise each time. Gerard

Bug#356131: marked as done (snd-emu10k1: wont talk to my soundcard)

2008-01-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 6 Jan 2008 21:21:38 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line snd-emu10k1: wont talk to my soundcard has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#340774: marked as done (udev: unable to register OSS PCM device 0:0 for snd-intel8x0 with dxr3 card installed)

2008-01-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 6 Jan 2008 21:13:12 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line unable to register OSS PCM device 0:0 for snd-intel8x0 with dxr3 card has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#345864: marked as done (problems with hdparm and udev during boot)

2008-01-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 6 Jan 2008 21:18:35 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line problems with hdparm and udev during boot has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#278822: 8139too and 3c509 hang alpha kernel hard

2008-01-06 Thread Robert van den Aker
maximilian attems wrote: can you still reproduce that with an Etch debian installer image or better with a newer Lenny install image? thanks for feedback. I'm sorry to report that I no longer have an Alpha, so I can't provide any further feedback. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Bug#442103: initramfs-tools: update-initramfs fails with lilo and a degraded raid1 array

2008-01-06 Thread maximilian attems
as some of you guys have a real usage scenario for lilo i checked and got zero output: ./lilo --help 21 | grep -- -H lilo does not print that flag yet in it's usage, so get that fixed first then i can use it in update-initramfs. happy hacking -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Processing of redhat-cluster_2.20080107-1_amd64.changes

2008-01-06 Thread Archive Administrator
redhat-cluster_2.20080107-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: redhat-cluster_2.20080107-1.dsc redhat-cluster_2.20080107.orig.tar.gz redhat-cluster_2.20080107-1.diff.gz cman_2.20080107-1_amd64.deb libcman2_2.20080107-1_amd64.deb

【INCLUBのメルマガお宝情報】 (クジ付き)NO.167-特選広告

2008-01-06 Thread INCLUB
**      【INCLUBのメルマガお宝情報】(くじ付き)    ◆貴方のビジネスパートナーです◆ **  ★「くじ」に当たれば有料独占広告が3回無料で配信できます   「くじ」はメルマガの最後の方にあります(1日3回まで) [EMAIL

Bug#381171: Not all Sound/Alsa devices are created properly under /dev/snd

2008-01-06 Thread maximilian attems
I get what seems to be similar problems with linux-image-2.6.18-4-686 as well as self-compiled kernels from Debian sources. can you try newer 2.6.22 from backports.org or 2.6.23 from unstable they install just fine in stable? they all have newer alsa. thanks for feedback -- maks -- To

Processed: found 440445 in 2.6.23-1

2008-01-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11 found 440445 2.6.23-1 Bug#440445: linux-2.6 - dies after some time on t2000 since .22 Bug marked as found in version 2.6.23-1. End of message, stopping processing here. Please

Bug#419950: NETDEV WATCHDOG problems return

2008-01-06 Thread Lou Poppler
Back in April, 2007, I opened this bug because of problems with NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out errors. I found that changing one of my BIOS settings seemed to make the problem go away. The setup menu named Resource Configuration offers a setting named Shared PCI IRQs. I found that

redhat-cluster_2.20080107-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

2008-01-06 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: cman_2.20080107-1_amd64.deb to pool/main/r/redhat-cluster/cman_2.20080107-1_amd64.deb gfs-tools_2.20080107-1_amd64.deb to pool/main/r/redhat-cluster/gfs-tools_2.20080107-1_amd64.deb gfs2-tools_2.20080107-1_amd64.deb to pool/main/r/redhat-cluster/gfs2-tools_2.20080107-1_amd64.deb