On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 11:43:48PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
On Tue, 18 Mar 2008, dann frazier wrote:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 01:50:42PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
* gdth unfixed
fixed with upcoming 2.6.24.4
* CONFIG_SECURITY_FILE_CAPABILITIES vs. atd
Anyone object
Hi debian-kernel@lists.debian.org,br/br/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] has invited you to Spokeo,
which finds your friends' updates across the Web.
On average, Spokeo finds 87 friends across 30 different social
networks. See what Spokeo can find for you now!
Click
Samuel Thibault [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello,
Mario Lang, le Tue 25 Mar 2008 17:28:32 +0100, a écrit :
Samuel Thibault [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
(speakup can now be compiled fully independently)
linux-modules-extra-2.6 seems like the perfect place for speakup, now that it
does not
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 03:06:58PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Samuel Thibault [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello,
Mario Lang, le Tue 25 Mar 2008 17:28:32 +0100, a écrit :
Samuel Thibault [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
(speakup can now be compiled fully independently)
Samuel Thibault, le Tue 25 Mar 2008 18:39:54 +, a écrit :
Apply patches/kernel-integration-2.6.24-source.patch to the main kernel
source to GPL-export 4 symbols,
Note: by that, I mean to pick that patch into the regular linux-2.6
kernel. That patch is already in the -mm tree actually.
Frans Pop, le Tue 25 Mar 2008 19:29:56 +0100, a écrit :
(Please don't CC me on list mail.)
Then tell your mailer to use followup-to :)
On Tuesday 25 March 2008, Samuel Thibault wrote:
The idea is to compile the speakup module out-of-tree but still include
it in d-i.
Why would you want
Hello,
maximilian attems, le Tue 25 Mar 2008 19:31:03 +0100, a écrit :
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 03:06:58PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Samuel Thibault [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello,
Mario Lang, le Tue 25 Mar 2008 17:28:32 +0100, a écrit :
Samuel Thibault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
Otavio Salvador, le Tue 25 Mar 2008 15:06:58 -0300, a écrit :
Samuel Thibault [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mario Lang, le Tue 25 Mar 2008 17:28:32 +0100, a écrit :
Samuel Thibault [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
(speakup can now be compiled fully independently)
linux-modules-extra-2.6
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 06:50:01PM +, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Samuel Thibault, le Tue 25 Mar 2008 18:39:54 +, a écrit :
Apply patches/kernel-integration-2.6.24-source.patch to the main kernel
source to GPL-export 4 symbols,
Note: by that, I mean to pick that patch into the regular
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 06:39:54PM +, Samuel Thibault wrote:
make $(cat allmodules.mk) SUBDIRS=$PWD -C /some/where/linux-whatever
First: s/SUBDIRS/M/.
Second:
| $ make -C /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.24-1-powerpc M=$(pwd) $(cat allmodule.mk)
| make: Entering directory
maximilian attems, le Tue 25 Mar 2008 20:13:30 +0100, a écrit :
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 06:50:01PM +, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Samuel Thibault, le Tue 25 Mar 2008 18:39:54 +, a écrit :
Apply patches/kernel-integration-2.6.24-source.patch to the main kernel
source to GPL-export 4
On Tuesday 25 March 2008, Samuel Thibault wrote:
It is not part of the upstream kernel.
OK. I misunderstood that. My apologies.
Anyway, it still needs to be included in linux-2.6 and l-e-m before we can
really discuss inclusion in the installer.
Having it in l-m-e should not be a problem for
Hello,
Bastian Blank, le Tue 25 Mar 2008 21:22:25 +0100, a écrit :
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 06:39:54PM +, Samuel Thibault wrote:
make $(cat allmodules.mk) SUBDIRS=$PWD -C /some/where/linux-whatever
First: s/SUBDIRS/M/.
Oh, right.
| $ make -C /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.24-1-powerpc
Frans Pop, le Tue 25 Mar 2008 21:40:24 +0100, a écrit :
On Tuesday 25 March 2008, Samuel Thibault wrote:
It is not part of the upstream kernel.
OK. I misunderstood that. My apologies.
No problem.
Anyway, it still needs to be included in linux-2.6 and l-e-m before we can
really discuss
Frans Pop, le Tue 25 Mar 2008 20:44:03 +0100, a écrit :
The idea is not to compile speakup built into the kernel, but just as a
module, and then it doesn't need to be integrated to the kernel build
system,
Compiling it into the kernel is not what I'm talking about. It definitely
should
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 07:43:47PM +, Samuel Thibault wrote:
maximilian attems, le Tue 25 Mar 2008 20:13:30 +0100, a écrit :
once it is in next
in next?
next is the linux tree of things that are ready for the next
merge window aka 2.6.26 now.
2.6.24 window is closed anyway.
maximilian attems, le Tue 25 Mar 2008 23:27:14 +0100, a écrit :
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 07:43:47PM +, Samuel Thibault wrote:
maximilian attems, le Tue 25 Mar 2008 20:13:30 +0100, a écrit :
once it is in next
in next?
next is the linux tree of things that are ready for the
Samuel Thibault [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2.6.24 window is closed anyway.
You mean the upstream or the Debian?
debian
Ah, so since Lenny's d-i is supposed to use 2.6.24, speakup won't make
it into it :/
Beta2 is probably going to be released with 2.6.24 but I guess lenny
will still
18 matches
Mail list logo