Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 474964
Bug#474964: Loads pcspkr and others even if explicitely excluded in
modprobe.conf
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
* Markus Broeker:
Tags: security
X-Debbugs-CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Why do you think this is a security bug?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 01:04:39PM +0300, Mikko Rapeli wrote:
Hello,
Wiki page told to post here, though perhaps you follow debian-kernel
bugs too. Anyway, added support for newer hardware would be great if
previously working drivers would keep working :)
What are the odds of applying
I created an etch branch for linux-kbuild-2.6 2.6.24, did a build
(renamed orig.tar.gz) and tested a module build - seems fine to
me. If noone sees the need for further changes, I'll upload tomorrow.
--
dann frazier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 01:57:24AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 01:04:39PM +0300, Mikko Rapeli wrote:
Hello,
Wiki page told to post here, though perhaps you follow debian-kernel
bugs too. Anyway, added support for newer hardware would be great if
previously
Your message dated Thu, 10 Apr 2008 11:38:51 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
has caused the report #475319,
regarding linux-image-2.6.24-1-amd64: Hangs on boot after ACPI: Battery slot
[BAT1] (battery present)
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
author(s)
On Thursday 10 April 2008, neeraj bahree wrote:
I am facing problem in installing CA BrightStor Arc Serve Backup agent on
Debian.If I install the package with command:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/Linux# ./install
It's gives the error:
./install: 299: Syntax error: Bad substitution
This means you are
Le jeudi, 3 avril 2008 17.48:57 Rafael J. Wysocki, vous avez écrit :
On Thursday, 3 of April 2008, Didier Raboud wrote:
Le mercredi, 2 avril 2008 14.06:29 Didier Raboud, vous avez écrit :
Le mardi, 1 avril 2008 23.22:35 Rafael J. Wysocki, vous avez écrit :
On Tuesday, 1 of April 2008,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.20
forwarded 475283 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7785
Bug#475283: [linux-source-2.6.24] known kernel bug/warning in fs/inotify.c:172
Noted your statement that Bug has been
Hi,
I'm so sorry to be such a bad bug reporter.
Anyway,
I've upgrade to 2.6.24-1 :
uname -a
Linux lgmt-th3 2.6.24-1-amd64 #1 SMP Thu Mar 27 16:52:38 UTC 2008 x86_64
GNU/Linux
I *can* boot with the noacpi. Here is my /boot/grub/menu.lst with noacpi :
title Debian GNU/Linux,
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 09:28:24AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
What about non-x86 architectures, well i guess ia64 and
powerpc/powerpc64 are the most interesting candidates.
It should be zero cost there too if it has been implemented
correctly. The only feature that initially generated a minimum
Package: linux-image-2.6.24-1-sparc64
Version: 2.6.24-5
the command ebtables -L
error : The kernel doesn't support the ebtables 'filter' table.
the correct answer would be :
Bridge table: filter
Bridge chain: INPUT, entries: 0, policy: ACCEPT
Bridge chain: FORWARD, entries: 0, policy: ACCEPT
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 02:31:02PM +0200, Xavier Pessoles wrote:
I'm so sorry to be such a bad bug reporter.
well we don't have a real acpi maintainer here.
Anyway,
I've upgrade to 2.6.24-1 :
so please test out newer 2.6.25-rc8,
if problem persists there please file in
Package: tasksel
Version: 2.73
Severity: wishlist
kerneloops allows to track oopses accross distribution
and versions. it is default installed since fedora 9.
it be really cool if Lenny would ship it too.
it would allow to have better feedback of the shipped
quality of the corresponding Linux
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 12:08:35PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
Mikko Rapeli wrote:
Feel free to sponsor, adopt, hijack, NMU, fix or redo the package, if it
helps
getting cs46xx audio driver back.
Thanks for your work, I'll check to integrate that firmware into
firmware-nonfree
dann frazier wrote:
Sorry if I'm missing something, but in this case I don't think we can
legally include it in non-free since there is no license and
therefore no permission to redistribute :(
yep, as stated on my answer here:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2008/04/msg00141.html
--
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.92
Severity: minor
File: /usr/share/man/man5/update-initramfs.conf.5.gz
The configuration file allows to disable the update action from update-
initramfs.
Actually it does more...
GENERAL VARIABLES
update_initramfs
linux-kbuild-2.6.24_2.6.24-1~etchnhalf.1_ia64.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
linux-kbuild-2.6.24_2.6.24-1~etchnhalf.1.dsc
linux-kbuild-2.6.24_2.6.24.orig.tar.gz
linux-kbuild-2.6.24_2.6.24-1~etchnhalf.1.diff.gz
Package: linux-image-2.6.24-1-amd64
Version: 5
Severity: normal
Hi,
with the upgrade to 2.6.24 I cannot get digital sound to work any more.
With the following options provided it worked (and works) fine with 2.6.23:
snd-hda-intel model=6stack-dig
Starting with 2.6.24 I get the following error
(new) linux-kbuild-2.6.24_2.6.24-1~etchnhalf.1.diff.gz optional devel
(new) linux-kbuild-2.6.24_2.6.24-1~etchnhalf.1.dsc optional devel
(new) linux-kbuild-2.6.24_2.6.24-1~etchnhalf.1_ia64.deb optional devel
Kbuild infrastructure for Linux 2.6.24
This package provides the kbuild infrastructure for
Accepted:
linux-kbuild-2.6.24_2.6.24-1~etchnhalf.1.diff.gz
to
pool/main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6.24/linux-kbuild-2.6.24_2.6.24-1~etchnhalf.1.diff.gz
linux-kbuild-2.6.24_2.6.24-1~etchnhalf.1.dsc
to
pool/main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6.24/linux-kbuild-2.6.24_2.6.24-1~etchnhalf.1.dsc
Accepted:
atl2-modules-2.6-486_2.6.24-7_i386.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-modules-extra-2.6/atl2-modules-2.6-486_2.6.24-7_i386.deb
atl2-modules-2.6-686-bigmem_2.6.24-7_i386.deb
to
pool/main/l/linux-modules-extra-2.6/atl2-modules-2.6-686-bigmem_2.6.24-7_i386.deb
Package: linux-modules-extra-2.6
Version: 2.6.24-7
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
Automatic build of linux-modules-extra-2.6_2.6.24-7 on lebrun by sbuild/sparc
98
Build started at 20080411-0009
[...]
** Using build dependencies supplied by
I am seeing this with a Samsung Q45 laptop:
02:00.0 Network controller [0280]: Intel Corporation PRO/Wireless
3945ABG Network Connection [8086:4222] (rev 02)
with both linux-image-2.6.24-1-amd64 version 2.6.24-5 and
linux-image-2.6.25-rc8-amd64 version
Package: firmware-ralink
Version: 0.10
Severity: wishlist
It would be nice to have this package in main. It looks like this could be
switched to the ISC licence as OpenBSD uses for distribution or ral and rum
firmwares:
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/~checkout~/src/sys/dev/microcode/
I
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 09:48:45PM +0200, Martin Kittel wrote:
Package: linux-image-2.6.24-1-amd64
Version: 5
Severity: normal
Hi,
with the upgrade to 2.6.24 I cannot get digital sound to work any more.
With the following options provided it worked (and works) fine with 2.6.23:
Your message dated Fri, 11 Apr 2008 01:16:45 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Close
has caused the Debian Bug report #475490,
regarding [firmware-ralink] Please switch to ISC licence
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
27 matches
Mail list logo
