Bug#566626: linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-amd64: updating a kernel should start re-building DKMS modules

2010-01-24 Thread Wolfgang Schnitker
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-5
Severity: normal

Hello, I am using virtualbox-ose on my machine, therefore I have to build the 
vbox module every time, a kernel update comes up.

Because DKMS is early loaded at system startup and after update no Module is 
present, booting slowes down until module loading stops with an error.

In my opinion kernel-image should trigger a rebuild od DKMS modules against 
newly installed kernel.

-- Package-specific info:
** Version:
Linux version 2.6.32-trunk-amd64 (Debian 2.6.32-5) (b...@decadent.org.uk) (gcc 
version 4.3.4 (Debian 4.3.4-6) ) #1 SMP Sun Jan 10 22:40:40 UTC 2010

** Command line:
BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-trunk-amd64 
root=UUID=6d5e0a18-9f91-417e-8420-e84426331857 ro quiet selinux=1

** Not tainted

** Kernel log:
[ 2090.211950] __ratelimit: 30 callbacks suppressed
[ 2090.211958] type=1400 audit(1264324713.232:181): avc:  denied  { getattr } 
for  pid=3451 comm=udevd path=/var/run/ConsoleKit/database dev=sda1 
ino=3670163 scontext=system_u:system_r:udev_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 
tcontext=system_u:object_r:consolekit_var_run_t:s0 tclass=file
[ 2090.324104] type=1400 audit(1264324713.342:182): avc:  denied  { read } for  
pid=5761 comm=udev-acl name=database dev=sda1 ino=3670163 
scontext=system_u:system_r:udev_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 
tcontext=system_u:object_r:consolekit_var_run_t:s0 tclass=file
[ 2090.324223] type=1400 audit(1264324713.342:183): avc:  denied  { open } for  
pid=5761 comm=udev-acl name=database dev=sda1 ino=3670163 
scontext=system_u:system_r:udev_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 
tcontext=system_u:object_r:consolekit_var_run_t:s0 tclass=file
[ 2399.625382] type=1400 audit(1264325022.645:184): avc:  denied  { getattr } 
for  pid=5810 comm=udev-acl.ck path=/dev/.udev/db/serio:serio0 dev=tmpfs 
ino=4178 scontext=system_u:system_r:consolekit_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 
tcontext=system_u:object_r:udev_tbl_t:s0 tclass=file
[ 2399.625512] type=1400 audit(1264325022.645:185): avc:  denied  { read } for  
pid=5810 comm=udev-acl.ck name=serio:serio0 dev=tmpfs ino=4178 
scontext=system_u:system_r:consolekit_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 
tcontext=system_u:object_r:udev_tbl_t:s0 tclass=file
[ 2399.625627] type=1400 audit(1264325022.645:186): avc:  denied  { open } for  
pid=5810 comm=udev-acl.ck name=serio:serio0 dev=tmpfs ino=4178 
scontext=system_u:system_r:consolekit_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 
tcontext=system_u:object_r:udev_tbl_t:s0 tclass=file
[ 2399.660099] type=1400 audit(1264325022.677:187): avc:  denied  { getattr } 
for  pid=5810 comm=udev-acl.ck name=002 dev=tmpfs ino=2003 
scontext=system_u:system_r:consolekit_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 
tcontext=system_u:object_r:usb_device_t:s0 tclass=chr_file
[ 2399.660344] type=1400 audit(1264325022.681:188): avc:  denied  { setattr } 
for  pid=5810 comm=udev-acl.ck name=002 dev=tmpfs ino=2003 
scontext=system_u:system_r:consolekit_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 
tcontext=system_u:object_r:usb_device_t:s0 tclass=chr_file
[ 2399.660656] type=1400 audit(1264325022.681:189): avc:  denied  { getattr } 
for  pid=5810 comm=udev-acl.ck name=adsp dev=tmpfs ino=5976 
scontext=system_u:system_r:consolekit_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 
tcontext=system_u:object_r:sound_device_t:s0 tclass=chr_file
[ 2399.660785] type=1400 audit(1264325022.681:190): avc:  denied  { setattr } 
for  pid=5810 comm=udev-acl.ck name=adsp dev=tmpfs ino=5976 
scontext=system_u:system_r:consolekit_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 
tcontext=system_u:object_r:sound_device_t:s0 tclass=chr_file
[ 2399.662728] type=1400 audit(1264325022.681:191): avc:  denied  { getattr } 
for  pid=5810 comm=udev-acl.ck name=sr0 dev=tmpfs ino=1864 
scontext=system_u:system_r:consolekit_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 
tcontext=system_u:object_r:removable_device_t:s0 tclass=blk_file
[ 2399.662856] type=1400 audit(1264325022.681:192): avc:  denied  { setattr } 
for  pid=5810 comm=udev-acl.ck name=sr0 dev=tmpfs ino=1864 
scontext=system_u:system_r:consolekit_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 
tcontext=system_u:object_r:removable_device_t:s0 tclass=blk_file
[ 2402.008768] type=1400 audit(1264325025.029:193): avc:  denied  { 
execute_no_trans } for  pid=5922 comm=dbus-daemon 
path=/usr/lib/dbus-1.0/dbus-daemon-launch-helper dev=sda1 ino=6709256 
scontext=system_u:system_r:system_dbusd_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 
tcontext=system_u:object_r:lib_t:s0 tclass=file
[ 2408.897470] __ratelimit: 225 callbacks suppressed
[ 2408.897479] type=1400 audit(1264325031.918:269): avc:  denied  { 
execute_no_trans } for  pid=6034 comm=dbus-daemon 
path=/usr/lib/dbus-1.0/dbus-daemon-launch-helper dev=sda1 ino=6709256 
scontext=system_u:system_r:system_dbusd_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 
tcontext=system_u:object_r:lib_t:s0 tclass=file
[ 2408.938348] type=1400 audit(1264325031.957:270): avc:  denied  { create } 
for  pid=6034 comm=devkit-disks-da 
scontext=system_u:system_r:system_dbusd_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 
tcontext=system_u:system_r:system_dbusd_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 
tclass=netlink_kobject_uevent_socket
[ 2408.938605] type=1400 audit(1264325031.957:271): avc:  denied  { setopt } 
for  pid=6034 comm=devkit-disks-da 

Processed: bug 566547 is forwarded to http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15117

2010-01-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 forwarded 566547 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15117
Bug #566547 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-amd64: Segmentation fault 
during halt
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 
'http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15117'.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#566626: linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-amd64: updating a kernel should start re-building DKMS modules

2010-01-24 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sun, 2010-01-24 at 10:37 +0100, Wolfgang Schnitker wrote:
 Package: linux-2.6
 Version: 2.6.32-5
 Severity: normal
 
 Hello, I am using virtualbox-ose on my machine, therefore I have to
 build the vbox module every time, a kernel update comes up.
 
 Because DKMS is early loaded at system startup and after update no
 Module is present, booting slowes down until module loading stops with
 an error.
 
 In my opinion kernel-image should trigger a rebuild od DKMS modules
 against newly installed kernel.
[...]

DKMS installs a script in /etc/kernel/postinst.d which will be called by
the kernel package installation script.  This will rebuild modules as
necessary.  However, packages using DKMS have to opt in to this
automatic rebuild (AUTOINSTALL=yes), and it seems that virtualbox-ose
does not.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Any smoothly functioning technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#566547: [Fwd: Re: [Stable-review] [stable] [00/29] 2.6.32.6 stable review]

2010-01-24 Thread Ben Hutchings
 Forwarded Message 
From: Andrew Morton a...@linux-foundation.org
To: Greg KH gre...@suse.de
Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org, sta...@kernel.org, Xiaotian Feng 
df...@redhat.com, Thomas Gleixner t...@linutronix.de, 
torva...@linux-foundation.org, stable-rev...@kernel.org, 
a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: [Stable-review] [stable] [00/29] 2.6.32.6 stable review
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 23:21:52 -0800

On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 16:11:45 -0800 Greg KH gre...@suse.de wrote:

 This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.32.6 release.
 There are 29 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to
 this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let
 us know.  If anyone is a maintainer of the proper subsystem, and wants
 to add a Signed-off-by: line to the patch, please respond with it.
 
 Responses should be made by Monday, January 24, 00:00:00 UTC.
 Anything received after that time might be too late.

2.6.32.6 will still contain the regression described in (for example)

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15117 
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15005

It's fixed with the below revert which has been in -mm (and only in
-mm) for ten days.

I don't what's going on - perhaps we're waiting for Thomas, and he's
otherwise engaged.  There's a fix in the lkml thread Re: [RFC PATCH
0/4] clockevents: fix clockevent_devices list corruption after cpu
hotplug to which Thomas replied

I just applied your patch, but kept the cpuweight check.  This
is the least intrusive solution for now.  The logic needs an
overhaul, but thats neither rc4 nor stable material

but no such patch is present in linux-next.



From: Andrew Morton a...@linux-foundation.org

Revert

: commit bb6eddf7676e1c1f3e637aa93c5224488d99036f
: Author: Thomas Gleixner t...@linutronix.de
: AuthorDate: Thu Dec 10 15:35:10 2009 +0100
: Commit: Thomas Gleixner t...@linutronix.de
: CommitDate: Fri Dec 11 10:28:08 2009 +0100
: 
: clockevents: Prevent clockevent_devices list corruption on cpu hotplug

due to the regression reported in
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15005

Cc: Xiaotian Feng df...@redhat.com
Cc: Thomas Gleixner t...@linutronix.de
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl
Reported-by: Martin Bammer mr...@gmx.at
Cc: sta...@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton a...@linux-foundation.org
---

 kernel/time/clockevents.c |   18 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff -puN 
kernel/time/clockevents.c~revert-clockevents-prevent-clockevent_devices-list-corruption-on-cpu-hotplug
 kernel/time/clockevents.c
--- 
a/kernel/time/clockevents.c~revert-clockevents-prevent-clockevent_devices-list-corruption-on-cpu-hotplug
+++ a/kernel/time/clockevents.c
@@ -238,9 +238,8 @@ void clockevents_exchange_device(struct 
  */
 void clockevents_notify(unsigned long reason, void *arg)
 {
-   struct clock_event_device *dev, *tmp;
+   struct list_head *node, *tmp;
unsigned long flags;
-   int cpu;
 
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(clockevents_lock, flags);
clockevents_do_notify(reason, arg);
@@ -251,19 +250,8 @@ void clockevents_notify(unsigned long re
 * Unregister the clock event devices which were
 * released from the users in the notify chain.
 */
-   list_for_each_entry_safe(dev, tmp, clockevents_released, list)
-   list_del(dev-list);
-   /*
-* Now check whether the CPU has left unused per cpu devices
-*/
-   cpu = *((int *)arg);
-   list_for_each_entry_safe(dev, tmp, clockevent_devices, list) {
-   if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, dev-cpumask) 
-   cpumask_weight(dev-cpumask) == 1) {
-   BUG_ON(dev-mode != CLOCK_EVT_MODE_UNUSED);
-   list_del(dev-list);
-   }
-   }
+   list_for_each_safe(node, tmp, clockevents_released)
+   list_del(node);
break;
default:
break;
_

___
Stable-review mailing list
stable-rev...@linux.kernel.org
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/stable-review




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: reassign 566626 to virtualbox-ose

2010-01-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 reassign 566626 virtualbox-ose
Bug #566626 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-amd64: updating a kernel 
should start re-building DKMS modules
Bug reassigned from package 'linux-2.6' to 'virtualbox-ose'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions 2.6.32-5.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: tagging 566547

2010-01-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 tags 566547 patch
Bug #566547 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-amd64: Segmentation fault 
during halt
Added tag(s) patch.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: reassign 564010 to initramfs-tools

2010-01-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 reassign 564010 initramfs-tools 0.93.4
Bug #564010 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-686: fails to boot
Bug reassigned from package 'linux-2.6' to 'initramfs-tools'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions 2.6.32-3.
Bug #564010 [initramfs-tools] linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-686: fails to boot
Bug Marked as found in versions initramfs-tools/0.93.4.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#566019: linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-amd64: Debian does not wake up after standby

2010-01-24 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 18:58 +0100, Carl-M. Hoefer wrote:
 Package: linux-2.6
 Version: 2.6.32-5
 Severity: important
 
 I i try to wake the computer up from standy, i just get a black screen.
 No keyboard inputs have any affect.
 Ping from other computers get an timeout.
 
 I looked at /var/log/messages var/log/syslog and /var/log/pm-suspend.log and 
 could not find any error.
 The logs are in an pastebin here: 
 https://debianforum.de/forum/pastebin.php?mode=views=34165
 
 Sometimes the wakeup from standby works. It's kinda random, atleast i can't 
 see any patterns.

Please report this at http://bugzilla.kernel.org/, under product
'Power Management', component 'Hibernation/Suspend'.  Let us know the
bug number so we can track it.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Any smoothly functioning technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Processed: found 562085 in 2.6.31-3, severity of 562085 is normal

2010-01-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 found 562085 2.6.31-3
Bug #562085 [linux-2.6] v4l2: tv video device drops frames
There is no source info for the package 'linux-2.6' at version '2.6.31-3' with 
architecture ''
Unable to make a source version for version '2.6.31-3'
Bug Marked as found in versions 2.6.31-3.
 severity 562085 normal
Bug #562085 [linux-2.6] v4l2: tv video device drops frames
Severity set to 'normal' from 'important'

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#566480: closed by maximilian attems m...@stro.at (Re: Bug#566480: acknowledged by developer (closing 566480))

2010-01-24 Thread Eduard Bloch
Hello,

I think you still do not understand what the user who reports bug
against your packages receives. Here is an example, this is the only
mail which I get when you close a bug.

READ IT:

* Debian Bug Tracking System [Sat, Jan 23 2010, 11:36:09PM]:
 This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
 which was filed against the initramfs-tools package:
 
 #566480: wait loop spams the console
 
 It has been closed by maximilian attems m...@stro.at.
 
 Their explanation is attached below along with your original report.
 If this explanation is unsatisfactory and you have not received a
 better one in a separate message then please contact maximilian attems 
 m...@stro.at by
 replying to this email.
 -- 
 566480: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=566480

See? Where is the information that it talks about? It was not sent by
you in email. Let's click on the page. There is still nothing at the
first glance. NOTHING.  Your only small comment line is hidden in some
linked BTS control mail.

 Debian Bug Tracking System
 Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

 On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 07:46:05PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
  reopen 566480
  thanks
 
 stop it, with this attitude you won't get much an explanation.

Does any right attitude exist that will cause getting more information
from you? I don't think so.

 beside the obvious that a short loop is desirable for quicker
 boot and thus not a boot.

Parse error. It might be desirable but it, as said, spams the console.

 for more hints on debugging read man initramfs-tools.

RLLY? Let's check:

| debug generates lots of output. It writes a log to 
/dev/.initramfs/initramfs.debug.  Instead when invoked with an arbitrary 
argument output is written to console.  Use for example debug=vc.

Obvious questions: what is in the output? Does it expect an
argument/value or not? What does Instead of refer to, instead of ...
what? What does vc mean in the example?

Do you want me to review and improve that manpage? (= serious offer to
help)

 closing with maintainers hat on, loose someone else time.

The maintainer's hat is not a license for any kind of rude
behavior.

  Weil das mehr Arbeit für mich verursacht? Weil DU also extra Arbeit den
  Anderen auflastet, um dir ein Minimum davon zu ersparen?
 
 yes this called free software, read the source and fix it.

... and also not a license to bring standard excuses.

 I don't use kernel-package nor does linux-2.6 use it, nor would i ever
 recommend it to my worst enemy. but it was fucking me who tried to come
 up with a fucking patch.

First, I don't care much about what exactly happens behind the scenes
and who created which patch for whom and why and when and for what...
I just report an obvious bug in a package to its maintainer (or call it
unexpected bad behavior if you are allergic to the word bug). That's
all. Since I am just a user here, I do not have to make myself prepared
to dispatch your internal issues. YOU have the maintainers hat on, so
take the responsibility which this brings along.

Second, get some vacation, ASAP, please. You are demonstrating burnout
symptoms (profanity, overreacting) similar to those seen on Xu
(former initrdtools maintainer) short time before he left. That's not
good, not for you, not for others.

Regards,
Eduard.

-- 
LGS Halloechen, ihr Spinner, so frueh auf?
nusse nein, wir schlafen alle im kollektiv
knorke mein alkoven ist kaputt
teq alkohol kaputt?



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



lxc linux image flavour

2010-01-24 Thread maximilian attems
hello,

the plan as decided in Portland was to go forward with openvz
if upstream provides us with a patch in time. as currently this
looks quite bad (latest available patch is for 2.6.27, there is
no sign of a patch for 2.6.32, nor any schedule like it happened
to be for Lenny).

I thus propose to enable an lxc (linux containers) [1] flavour:
* Containers are sets of processes with private namespaces, which
  can look like separate boxes
* lxc is merged in linux-2.6 and continuously improved
  (the maintenance of it should be thus much lower then
   it was for openvz)
* lxc is fast and bench mark tested [2]
* the lxc userland is in sid and available for many archs
* libvirt support
* the 2.6.32 feature/fixes patch is tiny [3]
* RESOURCE_COUNTERS and CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR enabled
  (has overhead that is not acceptable, for general purpose images)

On the negative side it doesn't have yet checkpointing support
and not all net/ has netns support yet.


I'll wait until 1st of February and until contrary notice
would add an lxc flavour to 2.6.32.

kind regards
maks

[1] http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-lxc-containers/
http://lwn.net/Articles/219794/
[2] http://lwn.net/Articles/179345/
[3] 
http://lxc.sourceforge.net/patches/2.6.32/2.6.32-rc6/share-af-unix-socket-sysctl.patch

https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/containers/2010-January/022529.html

https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/containers/2010-January/022600.html




signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: lxc linux image flavour

2010-01-24 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Jan 24, maximilian attems m...@stro.at wrote:

 the plan as decided in Portland was to go forward with openvz
 if upstream provides us with a patch in time. as currently this
 looks quite bad (latest available patch is for 2.6.27, there is
 no sign of a patch for 2.6.32, nor any schedule like it happened
 to be for Lenny).
I expect that it will be released after the first beta of RHEL 6.

 On the negative side it doesn't have yet checkpointing support
 and not all net/ has netns support yet.
It's not just that, AFAIK there is no match for many of the
user_beancounters features (especially the accounting part) and e.g.
lack of the equivalent of vzctl enter is a critical issue for my
applications.
While I am happy to see better support for lxc in Debian, it does not
look like an openvz replacement yet.

-- 
ciao,
Marco


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#536413: compu te backf illed

2010-01-24 Thread Visit www . na47 . com

ordin and  motor way




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: lxc linux image flavour

2010-01-24 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 01:37:26PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
 I thus propose to enable an lxc (linux containers) [1] flavour:

Please describe the _kernel_ improvements over the normal images. Most
of it is already enabled in the default images and does not warrant for
an extra image.

 * lxc is merged in linux-2.6 and continuously improved
   (the maintenance of it should be thus much lower then
it was for openvz)

lxc is the userspace part.

 * RESOURCE_COUNTERS and CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR enabled
   (has overhead that is not acceptable, for general purpose images)

The description reads like it is possible to enable/disable the overhead
on boot time. Please elaborate.

Bastian

-- 
The sight of death frightens them [Earthers].
-- Kras the Klingon, Friday's Child, stardate 3497.2


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#406763: porte ntous chagr ining mesar ch

2010-01-24 Thread Visit www . na47 . com

infun dibul ar  aceto nic  hollo a




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#447153: sense catal ysers vibra nt genti le

2010-01-24 Thread Visit www . na47 . com

kraft  exasp erati ng  renew able




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#561552: linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-amd64: [agp/drm] agp + dri unavailable with testing X.org 1.6.5

2010-01-24 Thread Julien Cristau
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 06:06:52 +0100, tom schorpp wrote:

 Package: linux-2.6
 Version: 2.6.32-2
 Severity: normal
 
 At least tvtime works in indirect mode only, high CPU.
 
 Does not look like missing Firmware, no FW err messages in dmesg or syslog:
 
 --- /var/log/Xorg.0.log   2009-12-18 05:10:10.0 +0100
 +++ /var/log/Xorg.0.log.old   2009-12-18 05:06:14.0 +0100
 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
  Release Date: 2009-10-11
  X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0
  Build Operating System: Linux 2.6.30-2-amd64 x86_64 Debian
 -Current Operating System: Linux tom1 2.6.31-1-amd64 #1 SMP Mon Nov 16 
 04:44:38 UTC 2009 x86_64
 +Current Operating System: Linux tom1 2.6.32-trunk-amd64 #1 SMP Thu Dec 17 
 06:29:18 UTC 2009 x86_64
  Build Date: 13 October 2009  09:39:10AM
  xorg-server 2:1.6.5-1 (jcris...@debian.org) 
   Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.x.org
 @@ -1018,35 +1018,18 @@
  (II) RADEON(0): [drm] added 1 reserved context for kernel
  (II) RADEON(0): X context handle = 0x1
  (II) RADEON(0): [drm] installed DRM signal handler
 -(**) RADEON(0): Using AGP 4x
 -(II) RADEON(0): [agp] Mode 0x1f000a09 [AGP 0x1106/0x0282; Card 0x1002/0x4152 
 0x17af/0x2016]
 -(II) RADEON(0): [agp] 65536 kB allocated with handle 0x0001
 -(II) RADEON(0): [agp] ring handle = 0xd000
 -(II) RADEON(0): [agp] Ring mapped at 0x7f7f9fcc1000
 -(II) RADEON(0): [agp] ring read ptr handle = 0xd0101000
 -(II) RADEON(0): [agp] Ring read ptr mapped at 0x7f7f9fde7000
 -(II) RADEON(0): [agp] vertex/indirect buffers handle = 0xd0102000
 -(II) RADEON(0): [agp] Vertex/indirect buffers mapped at 0x7f7f9318a000
 -(II) RADEON(0): [agp] GART texture map handle = 0xd0302000
 -(II) RADEON(0): [agp] GART Texture map mapped at 0x7f7f8f58a000
 -(II) RADEON(0): [drm] register handle = 0x2fff8000
 -(II) RADEON(0): [dri] Visual configs initialized
 +(WW) RADEON(0): [agp] AGP not available
 +(EE) RADEON(0): [agp] AGP failed to initialize. Disabling the DRI.
 +(II) RADEON(0): [agp] You may want to make sure the agpgart kernel module
 +is loaded before the radeon kernel module.
 +(II) RADEON(0): [drm] removed 1 reserved context for kernel
 +(II) RADEON(0): [drm] unmapping 8192 bytes of SAREA 0x1b7ff000 at 
 0x7f757345f000
 +(II) RADEON(0): [drm] Closed DRM master.

So this came up a while back on #radeon, and today again on #debian-x.

Two possible leads:
23:45:18  jcristau airlied: does the above ring a bell?  (agp failure
with 2.6.32, works with .31)

23:52:41  Ghworg Debian have changed the kernel config CONFIG_AGP from
'y' to 'm' going from 31 to 32, that could be affecting it

00:07:29 @airlied jcristau: could be the AGP DMA changes I suppose

The first is probably easier to check.  Otherwise a bisection would
probably help narrow it down.

Cheers,
Julien



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#512779: attes ter smutt y stick ing

2010-01-24 Thread Visit www . na47 . com

elect ion  exact  grand mothe r  missh apenl y  prior itizi ng




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: lxc linux image flavour

2010-01-24 Thread Suno Ano
 Bastian Please describe the _kernel_ improvements over the normal
 Bastian images. Most of it is already enabled in the default images
 Bastian and does not warrant for an extra image.

As you can see from http://sunoano.pastebin.com/m4b5380dc , line 29,
Cgroup memory controller is not. This setting is mandatory if you want
to control the available memory per containers and the like. IMO most
folks would want that, if just to make sure their local sandbox does not
go wild for some reason, thus eating up all memory.



 Bastian Lxc is the userspace part.

You are right but then I think maximilian certainly referred to the
kernelspace part of LXC here. At least that is my reading ... context
matters :)




 Bastian The description reads like it is possible to enable/disable
 Bastian the overhead on boot time. Please elaborate.

Nope, it has to be enabled at build-time. http://lxc.teegra.net




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: lxc linux image flavour

2010-01-24 Thread Marco d'Itri
In linux.debian.kernel Suno Ano suno@sunoano.org wrote:

 - most folks run Linux-VServer, OpenVZ, LXC etc. on boxes they own plus
   they control themselves so that is not really an issue
I wonder how you came to this conclusion.

 - those environments in need for limits/beancounters (disk quota etc.)
   may probably have to wait another six months or so until it will be
   available in LXC. Till then it is quite possible to run on 2.6.26
   with OpenVZ and then migrate things to LXC. We have excellent
So it will not actually be available in squeeze, and squeeze cannot work
with the lenny kernels unless they are rebuilt with
CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED=n.
You could as well have said proposed to wait and use the RHEL6 kernels.

 Marco Lack of the equivalent of vzctl enter is a critical issue for
 Marco my applications.
I do not remember the exact command now but from what I remember
hearing/reading last week, that feature will be available shortly.
I remember hearing last week that there is no simple way to move a
running process to a different cgroup, so it will be very hard to
implement this.

-- 
ciao,
Marco


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: lxc linux image flavour

2010-01-24 Thread Suno Ano
  - Those environments in need for limits/beancounters (disk quota
etc.) May probably have to wait another six months or so until it
will be available in LXC. Till then it is quite possible to run on
2.6.26 with OpenVZ and then migrate things to LXC.

 Marco So it will not actually be available in squeeze, and squeeze
 Marco cannot work with the lenny kernels unless they are rebuilt with
 Marco CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED=n. You could as well have said proposed
 Marco to wait and use the RHEL6 kernels.

I did not propose anything. I just pointed out one possible migration
path from OpenVZ to LXC. I have a few servers running testing with
2.6.26. One could wait (read not upgrade) till LXC provides for
beancounters etc. and then migrate to squeeze and thus LXC.

And yes, squeeze rc1 would probably not have beancounters but some later
rc would probably provide it in case the kernel gets an update. As for
RHEL6, nobody seems to know when it will be released.

One thing I am sure, I am not proposing to wait for RHEL6 kernels since
I am in favor of LXC since it is in mainline and not maintained out of
tree as is OpenVZ.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: lxc linux image flavour

2010-01-24 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sun, 2010-01-24 at 15:17 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
 On Jan 24, maximilian attems m...@stro.at wrote:
 
  the plan as decided in Portland was to go forward with openvz
  if upstream provides us with a patch in time. as currently this
  looks quite bad (latest available patch is for 2.6.27, there is
  no sign of a patch for 2.6.32, nor any schedule like it happened
  to be for Lenny).
 I expect that it will be released after the first beta of RHEL 6.
[...]

I believe there already has been a beta, just not a public one.  RH
seems to be very secretive about this release.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Any smoothly functioning technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#566727: linux-image-2.6.32 missing memory cgroup controllers

2010-01-24 Thread Brian Kroth
Package: linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-amd64
Version: 2.6.32-5
Severity: wishlist

Support for memory cgroups controllers are not included in the new
2.6.32 kernel.  This would be nice say for putting limits on a how much
memory a group of VMs can use.

I believe the following two options need to be enabled in the kernel:
CONFIG_RESOURCE_COUNTERS
CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR

Here's some more info:

# dpkg -l | grep linux-image-2.6.32
ii  linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-amd64  2.6.32-5 Linux 2.6.32 for 64-bit PCs

# uname -a
Linux oberon 2.6.32-trunk-amd64 #1 SMP Sun Jan 10 22:40:40 UTC 2010 x86_64 
GNU/Linux

# cat /proc/cgroups 
#subsys_namehierarchy   num_cgroups enabled
cpuset  0   1   1
ns  0   1   1
cpu 11  8   1
cpuacct 11  8   1
devices 11  8   1
freezer 0   1   1
net_cls 0   1   1

# cat /etc/debian_version 
squeeze/sid

See Also:
http://berrange.com/personal/diary/2009/12/using-cgroups-with-libvirt-and-lxckvm

Let me know if you need any more info.

Thanks,
Brian


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#566726: linux-source-2.6.32: compile fails with multiple definition of `ieee80211_ errors

2010-01-24 Thread John Talbut
Package: linux-source-2.6.32
Version: 2.6.32-5
Severity: important

When I tried to compile a kernel it failed with the following messages:

  AR  arch/x86/lib/lib.a
  LD  vmlinux.o
net/built-in.o: In function `ieee80211_wake_queue':
(.text+0xbb5ed): multiple definition of `ieee80211_wake_queue'
drivers/built-in.o:(.text+0x15e699): first defined here
net/built-in.o: In function `ieee80211_rx':
(.text+0xb70f6): multiple definition of `ieee80211_rx'
drivers/built-in.o:(.text+0x164999): first defined here
net/built-in.o: In function `ieee80211_stop_queue':
(.text+0xba8d0): multiple definition of `ieee80211_stop_queue'
drivers/built-in.o:(.text+0x15c0f5): first defined here
make[1]: *** [vmlinux.o] Error 1

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-20091002 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages linux-source-2.6.32 depends on:
ii  binutils  2.20-5 The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii  bzip2 1.0.5-3high-quality block-sorting file co

Versions of packages linux-source-2.6.32 recommends:
ii  gcc   4:4.3.4-1  The GNU C compiler
ii  libc6-dev [libc-dev]  2.10.2-2   GNU C Library: Development Librari
ii  make  3.81-7 An utility for Directing compilati

Versions of packages linux-source-2.6.32 suggests:
ii  kernel-package12.032 A utility for building Linux kerne
ii  libncurses5-dev [ncurses- 5.7+20090803-2 developer's libraries and docs for
pn  libqt3-mt-dev none (no description available)

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#566726: linux-source-2.6.32: compile fails with multiple definition of `ieee80211_ errors

2010-01-24 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sun, 2010-01-24 at 20:32 +, John Talbut wrote:
 Package: linux-source-2.6.32
 Version: 2.6.32-5
 Severity: important
 
 When I tried to compile a kernel it failed with the following messages:
 
   AR  arch/x86/lib/lib.a
   LD  vmlinux.o
 net/built-in.o: In function `ieee80211_wake_queue':
 (.text+0xbb5ed): multiple definition of `ieee80211_wake_queue'
 drivers/built-in.o:(.text+0x15e699): first defined here
 net/built-in.o: In function `ieee80211_rx':
 (.text+0xb70f6): multiple definition of `ieee80211_rx'
 drivers/built-in.o:(.text+0x164999): first defined here
 net/built-in.o: In function `ieee80211_stop_queue':
 (.text+0xba8d0): multiple definition of `ieee80211_stop_queue'
 drivers/built-in.o:(.text+0x15c0f5): first defined here
 make[1]: *** [vmlinux.o] Error 1

Please send your config.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Any smoothly functioning technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Processed: tagging 566726

2010-01-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 tags 566726 moreinfo
Bug #566726 [linux-source-2.6.32] linux-source-2.6.32: compile fails with 
multiple definition of `ieee80211_   errors
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: lxc linux image flavour

2010-01-24 Thread Marco d'Itri
In linux.debian.kernel Suno Ano suno@sunoano.org wrote:

 Marco So it will not actually be available in squeeze, and squeeze
 Marco cannot work with the lenny kernels unless they are rebuilt with
 Marco CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED=n. You could as well have said proposed
 Marco to wait and use the RHEL6 kernels.
I did not propose anything. I just pointed out one possible migration
path from OpenVZ to LXC. I have a few servers running testing with
2.6.26. One could wait (read not upgrade) till LXC provides for
beancounters etc. and then migrate to squeeze and thus LXC.
Unlike Red Hat, Debian does not backport features so you can only count
on what is in 2.6.32 now.
You obviously have not upgraded testing recently, because the version of
udev currently in testing cannot work with the standard lenny kernel.

-- 
ciao,
Marco


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Bug#565639: SunBlade 1000 installation report - boot fails after installation

2010-01-24 Thread Jurij Smakov
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 05:08:55PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
 On Sunday 17 January 2010, Jurij Smakov wrote:
  Comments/Problems:
  Now that http://bugs.debian.org/562594 is fixed, I was able to
  continue the installation and it all went fine until the end.
  However, after finishing the installation machine fails to boot [...]
 
 As the installation itself works fine I would guess this is not an 
 installer problem, but a kernel issue. Maybe it leaves the hardware in an 
 incorrect state for the reboot.
 
 Have you tried a cold boot of the installed system?

Adding kernel team for comment: it looks like the value returned by 
uname -m has changed from 'sparc64' in kernel 2.6.26 to 'sparc' in 
2.6.30 (and, probably, later ones). This breaks SILO, which uses this 
value to determine what first-stage bootloader to install, as a result 
the sparc machines installed with current daily installer builds turn 
unbootable by the end of installation. Please confirm that this change 
is not a result of some Debian-specific patch or build procedure, as 
it should be reported upstream if that's not the case.

For reference:

ju...@debian:~$ uname -a
Linux debian 2.6.26-2-sparc64-smp #1 SMP Thu Nov 5 03:34:29 UTC 2009 sparc64 
GNU/Linux
ju...@debian:~$ uname -m
sparc64

~ # uname -a
Linux debian 2.6.30-2-sparc64 #1 Sat Sep 26 07:26:31 UTC 2009 sparc GNU/Linux
~ # uname -m
sparc

I've confirmed that forcing the machine type by running 'silo -u -f' 
makes the machine bootable again.

Best regards,
-- 
Jurij Smakov   ju...@wooyd.org
Key: http://www.wooyd.org/pgpkey/  KeyID: C99E03CC


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#566522: i'm say i'm noob :(

2010-01-24 Thread Piotr Skólski
After thrid line (pathing using debian script)

chmod +x debian/bin/gencontrol.py
debian/bin/gencontrol.py
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File debian/bin/gencontrol.py, line 331, in module
Gencontrol()()
  File debian/bin/gencontrol.py, line 14, in __init__
self.process_changelog()
  File debian/bin/gencontrol.py, line 305, in process_changelog
(distribution, version))
RuntimeError: Can't upload to unstable with a version of 2.6.32-5a~test
make: *** [debian/control-real] Error 1

I don't know what i can do now, i'm go sleep then.
Good Night :*

PS 3c503 irq=9 in /etc/modules work good.





-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#561552: linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-amd64: Issue confirmed

2010-01-24 Thread Mathias Brodala
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-5
Severity: normal

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

I'm also hit by this issue. I've attached some info in hope it helps
solving this one.

- -- Package-specific info:
** Version:
Linux version 2.6.32-trunk-amd64 (Debian 2.6.32-5) (b...@decadent.org.uk) (gcc 
version 4.3.4 (Debian 4.3.4-6) ) #1 SMP Sun Jan 10 07:51:13 UTC 2010

** Command line:
BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-trunk-amd64 root=/dev/hda6 ro single 
vt.default_blu=250,0,0,0,170,170,170,51,85,85,85,85,255,255,255,255 
vt.default_grn=250,0,170,85,0,0,170,51,85,85,255,255,85,85,255,255 
vt.default_red=250,170,0,170,0,170,0,51,85,255,85,255,85,255,85,255 
radeon.modeset=0

** Not tainted

** Kernel log:
[6.733285] usb 2-4: Product: USB-PS/2 Optical Mouse
[6.752762] usb 2-4: Manufacturer: Logitech
[6.772047] usb 2-4: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice
[6.808456] usbcore: registered new interface driver hiddev
[6.834351] input: Logitech USB-PS/2 Optical Mouse as 
/devices/pci:00/:00:02.0/usb2/2-4/2-4:1.0/input/input4
[6.854725] generic-usb 0003:046D:C01E.0001: input,hidraw0: USB HID v1.10 
Mouse [Logitech USB-PS/2 Optical Mouse] on usb-:00:02.0-4/input0
[6.896540] usbcore: registered new interface driver usbhid
[6.917675] usbhid: v2.6:USB HID core driver
[7.060781] kjournald starting.  Commit interval 5 seconds
[7.065046] EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
[   18.353422] udev: starting version 150
[   26.895886] processor LNXCPU:00: registered as cooling_device0
[   26.931182] processor LNXCPU:01: registered as cooling_device1
[   27.252782] input: PC Speaker as /devices/platform/pcspkr/input/input5
[   27.833906] Bluetooth: Core ver 2.15
[   27.867808] NET: Registered protocol family 31
[   27.901409] Bluetooth: HCI device and connection manager initialized
[   27.934801] Bluetooth: HCI socket layer initialized
[   27.996431] pci_hotplug: PCI Hot Plug PCI Core version: 0.5
[   28.807599] shpchp: Standard Hot Plug PCI Controller Driver version: 0.4
[   28.925040] EDAC MC: Ver: 2.1.0 Jan 10 2010
[   28.926438] Bluetooth: Generic Bluetooth USB driver ver 0.6
[   28.933621] usbcore: registered new interface driver btusb
[   28.937636] k8temp :00:18.3: Temperature readouts might be wrong - check 
erratum #141
[   29.068615] EDAC amd64_edac:  Ver: 3.2.0 Jan 10 2010
[   29.100037] EDAC amd64: This node reports that Memory ECC is currently 
disabled, set F3x44[22] (:00:18.3).
[   29.131504] EDAC amd64: WARNING: ECC is disabled by BIOS. Module will NOT be 
loaded.
[   29.131505]  Either Enable ECC in the BIOS, or set 'ecc_enable_override'.
[   29.131507]  Also, use of the override can cause unknown side effects.
[   29.224408] amd64_edac: probe of :00:18.2 failed with error -22
[   29.466900] i2c i2c-0: nForce2 SMBus adapter at 0x5000
[   29.497285] i2c i2c-1: nForce2 SMBus adapter at 0x5040
[   30.758378] ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKB] enabled at IRQ 17
[   30.787290]   alloc irq_desc for 17 on node 0
[   30.787293]   alloc kstat_irqs on node 0
[   30.787302] C-Media PCI :02:09.0: PCI INT A - Link[LNKB] - GSI 17 
(level, low) - IRQ 17
[   30.854148] HDA Intel :01:00.1: enabling device ( - 0002)
[   30.883124] pci :00:0b.0: can't derive routing for PCI INT B
[   30.911522] HDA Intel :01:00.1: PCI INT B: no GSI
[   30.939876] hda-intel: unable to grab IRQ 0, disabling device
[   30.967785] pci :00:0b.0: can't derive routing for PCI INT B
[   30.995214] HDA Intel: probe of :01:00.1 failed with error -16
[   32.143329] Adding 2096440k swap on /dev/hda8.  Priority:-1 extents:1 
across:2096440k 
[   32.454542] EXT3 FS on hda6, internal journal
[   32.669342] ide_generic: please use probe_mask=0x3f module parameter for 
probing all legacy ISA IDE ports
[   32.789815] tun: Universal TUN/TAP device driver, 1.6
[   32.810985] tun: (C) 1999-2004 Max Krasnyansky m...@qualcomm.com
[   32.886175] usbcore: registered new interface driver snd-usb-audio
[   32.915780] i2c /dev entries driver
[   32.943193] w83627ehf: Found W83627EHG chip at 0x290
[   33.559840] NTFS driver 2.1.29 [Flags: R/W MODULE].
[   33.680832] NTFS volume version 3.1.
[   33.740943] NTFS volume version 3.1.
[   33.813540] kjournald starting.  Commit interval 5 seconds
[   33.833030] EXT3-fs warning: maximal mount count reached, running e2fsck is 
recommended
[   33.853112] EXT3 FS on hda7, internal journal
[   33.872814] EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
[   33.936751] kjournald starting.  Commit interval 5 seconds
[   33.956549] EXT3-fs warning: maximal mount count reached, running e2fsck is 
recommended
[   33.976965] EXT3 FS on sda, internal journal
[   33.996842] EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
[   34.136818] SGI XFS with ACLs, security attributes, realtime, large 
block/inode numbers, no debug enabled
[   34.158684] SGI XFS Quota Management subsystem
[   34.200553] XFS mounting filesystem sdb1
[   

Re: loading kernel mode setting drivers

2010-01-24 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 01:34:45 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:

 On Jan 12, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
 
  Marco, what do you think of switching to this, or at least using its fb
  part?
 I do not mind explicitly blacklisting each fb driver, but I would like
 to have a way to semi-automatically generate the list. Is there any?
 
I suppose something like
find /lib/modules/$(uname -r)/kernel/drivers/video -type f|while read
mod; do echo blacklist $(basename $mod .ko); done
could work (possibly excluding some generic and backlight drivers, if
those should be autoloaded?).

Cheers,
Julien


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: lxc linux image flavour

2010-01-24 Thread maximilian attems
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 03:17:14PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
 lack of the equivalent of vzctl enter is a critical issue for my
 applications.

looks feasable thanks to libvirt:
virsh --connect lxc:/// console v1
http://libvirt.org/drvlxc.html


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: lxc linux image flavour

2010-01-24 Thread maximilian attems
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 03:17:14PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
 On Jan 24, maximilian attems m...@stro.at wrote:
 
  the plan as decided in Portland was to go forward with openvz
  if upstream provides us with a patch in time. as currently this
  looks quite bad (latest available patch is for 2.6.27, there is
  no sign of a patch for 2.6.32, nor any schedule like it happened
  to be for Lenny).
 I expect that it will be released after the first beta of RHEL 6.

point to an official statement of an openvz dev.
currently it looks like they are waiting too long to be in the squeeze
boat also kernel version should match.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: loading kernel mode setting drivers

2010-01-24 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 00:56 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
 On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 01:34:45 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
 
  On Jan 12, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
  
   Marco, what do you think of switching to this, or at least using its fb
   part?
  I do not mind explicitly blacklisting each fb driver, but I would like
  to have a way to semi-automatically generate the list. Is there any?
  
 I suppose something like
 find /lib/modules/$(uname -r)/kernel/drivers/video -type f|while read
 mod; do echo blacklist $(basename $mod .ko); done
 could work (possibly excluding some generic and backlight drivers, if
 those should be autoloaded?).

What about my suggestion of removing the MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE
declarations from fb modules, so they do not appear in modules.pcimap
etc?  Did you see any problem with that?

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Any smoothly functioning technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: lxc linux image flavour

2010-01-24 Thread Marco d'Itri
In linux.debian.kernel maximilian attems m...@stro.at wrote:

On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 03:17:14PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
 lack of the equivalent of vzctl enter is a critical issue for my
 applications.
looks feasable thanks to libvirt:
virsh --connect lxc:/// console v1
http://libvirt.org/drvlxc.html
Actually I meant vzctl exec so this is not even close: I need to
change the context of a running process.

-- 
ciao,
Marco


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: loading kernel mode setting drivers

2010-01-24 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 00:27:48 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:

 What about my suggestion of removing the MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE
 declarations from fb modules, so they do not appear in modules.pcimap
 etc?  Did you see any problem with that?
 
Dropping those and udev's blacklist would be fine as far as I'm
concerned.  Not sure what this means for people with custom kernel,
since they'd lose the blacklist too, but I don't care much either way.

Cheers,
Julien


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#564010: iwlwifi-6050-4.ucode missing

2010-01-24 Thread Aleksi Suhonen
Hi,

I have similar problems with my laptop and
I read the bug report logs and I still can't find

iwlwifi-6050-4.ucode

needed by iwlagn driver. This is forcing me to use
an older kernel where that driver still works. )-;

I've had this problem since 2.6.31. Also, why do
2.6.31 and 2.6.32 kernels turn my bluetooth radio
on at boot? 2.6.30 leaves it off until I want it,
so that it doesn't eat up my battery life.

--
Aleksi Suhonen

() ascii ribbon campaign
/\ support plain text e-mail



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#566539: linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-486: Minor formatting issue on info screen during update

2010-01-24 Thread Mike Castle
ii  debconf  1.5.28
 Debian configuration management system
ii  debconf-i18n 1.5.28
 full internationalization support for debcon


Configured to use dialog

ii  dialog
1.1-20080819-1 Displays user-friendly dialog boxes from
she


mrc



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: loading kernel mode setting drivers

2010-01-24 Thread Ben Hutchings
Julien Cristau wrote:
 On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 00:27:48 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
 
  What about my suggestion of removing the MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE
  declarations from fb modules, so they do not appear in modules.pcimap
  etc?  Did you see any problem with that?
  
 Dropping those and udev's blacklist would be fine as far as I'm
 concerned.  Not sure what this means for people with custom kernel,
 since they'd lose the blacklist too, but I don't care much either way.

I suppose we don't really want this level of coupling between udev and
the kernel.  So I'm happy to recommend your recipe to Marco, but with a
restriction to PCI drivers:

find /lib/modules/$(uname -r)/kernel/drivers/video -type f | {
while read mod; do
/sbin/modinfo $mod | grep -q '^alias: *pci' \
 echo blacklist $(basename $mod .ko)
done
}

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Any smoothly functioning technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Uploading linux-2.6

2010-01-24 Thread Ben Hutchings
There have been 2 upstream stable updates and one more (2.6.32.6) is due
early this week.  As usual, these include some security fixes.
Therefore I propose to upload with the changes from 2.6.32.6 once that's
released.

(Still no stable ABI, sorry.)

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Any smoothly functioning technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#565404: linux-image-2.6.26-2-amd64: atl1e: TSO is broken

2010-01-24 Thread Jie Yang
Anders Boström and...@netinsight.net wrote:

 Cc: b...@decadent.org.uk; net...@vger.kernel.org;
 565...@bugs.debian.org; Xiong Huang
 Subject: Re: Bug#565404: linux-image-2.6.26-2-amd64: atl1e:
 TSO is broken

 One strange observation is that I can only reproduce this
 problem when transmitting data from a NFS-server using TCP
 with Atheros AR8121/AR8113/AR8114.

 I've tried to reproduce the problem using test-programs, like
 nttcp and netpipe, without any success. One observation is
 that the test-programs *only* generates 1500 bytes
 IP-packets. When the NFS-server sends data, a sequence of
 1500 bytes IP-packets are generated, ending with a shorter
 packet. And this last packet in the sequence has 1500 in the
 IP-header length field, but is shorter.

following is my test cese,

a nfs server server with ar8131chip, device id 1063. export /tmp/ dir as the 
nfs share directory,
the client, mount the server_ip:/tmp to local dir /mnt/nfs, ust a python script 
to write and read data on the
/mnt/nfs/testnfs.log. it works fine.

Can you give me some advice on how to reproduce this bug??

Best wishes
jie



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Uploading linux-2.6

2010-01-24 Thread Luk Claes
Ben Hutchings wrote:
 There have been 2 upstream stable updates and one more (2.6.32.6) is due
 early this week.  As usual, these include some security fixes.
 Therefore I propose to upload with the changes from 2.6.32.6 once that's
 released.
 
 (Still no stable ABI, sorry.)

If the ABI changed the package name will change, right? Will it become
trunk2?

Cheers

Luk


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org