On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 15:51 +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
This combination works for me:
[snip]
Excellent. Thanks for testing.
Ian.
--
Ian Campbell
Current Noise: Hypocrisy - Compulsive Psychosis
phosflink:
To flick a bulb on and off when it burns out (as if, somehow, that
Your message dated Tue, 04 Jan 2011 10:05:02 +
with message-id e1pa3lg-0002y6...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#558740: fixed in firmware-nonfree 0.28
has caused the Debian Bug report #558740,
regarding firmware-linux-nonfree: Add Atheros AR9170 one stage firmware
(ar9170.fw)
to be
Your message dated Tue, 04 Jan 2011 10:05:02 +
with message-id e1pa3lg-0002ya...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#564628: fixed in firmware-nonfree 0.28
has caused the Debian Bug report #564628,
regarding Add Realtek RTL8168D firmware
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Tue, 04 Jan 2011 10:05:02 +
with message-id e1pa3lg-0002ya...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#564628: fixed in firmware-nonfree 0.28
has caused the Debian Bug report #564628,
regarding [Debian] Where can I find rtl81638d-2.fw firmware for Realtek 8168D
NIC?
to be
Your message dated Tue, 04 Jan 2011 10:05:02 +
with message-id e1pa3lg-0002yi...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#602450: fixed in firmware-nonfree 0.28
has caused the Debian Bug report #602450,
regarding firmware-nonfree: Please add rtlwifi/rtl8712u.bin, needed by r8712u
= 2.6.37, to
Your message dated Tue, 04 Jan 2011 10:05:02 +
with message-id e1pa3lg-0002ye...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#598470: fixed in firmware-nonfree 0.28
has caused the Debian Bug report #598470,
regarding bnx2-mips-06-5.0.0.j6.fw file not included in firmware-bnx2
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Tue, 04 Jan 2011 10:05:02 +
with message-id e1pa3lg-0002ym...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#606289: fixed in firmware-nonfree 0.28
has caused the Debian Bug report #606289,
regarding 4.0.517 firmware crashes frequently on HP NC522SFP
to be marked as done.
This
Accepted:
firmware-atheros_0.28_all.deb
to non-free/f/firmware-nonfree/firmware-atheros_0.28_all.deb
firmware-bnx2_0.28_all.deb
to non-free/f/firmware-nonfree/firmware-bnx2_0.28_all.deb
firmware-bnx2x_0.28_all.deb
to non-free/f/firmware-nonfree/firmware-bnx2x_0.28_all.deb
On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 08:45 +0100, Stephan Austermühle wrote:
Am 02.01.2011 20:27, schrieb Ian Campbell:
Did -28 work OK? Otherwise what was the last known good kernel?
The -29 kernel was the one that was installed when I've setup Squeeze.
So, there was never a different kernel on that
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 08:30:21PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Please report this upstream at https://bugzilla.kernel.org under
product ACPI, component Power-Battery. Let us know the bug number or
URL so we can track it.
I've just tried kernel image 2.6.37~rc7-1~experimental.1 from
I've put updated patches on
http://molly.corsac.net/~corsac/debian/kernel-grsec/patches/ (kernel is
built but not uploaded to packages/ since it's quite huge, will do that
at one point. Patches are attached to that mail too.
The first one (add-grsecurity-featureset) is against the debian kernel
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 603767 linux-2.6,xorg
Bug #603767 [general] gdm: starts on v8 instead of vt7
Bug reassigned from package 'general' to 'linux-2.6,xorg'.
reassign 596700 linux-2.6,xorg
Bug #596700 [xorg] The X server does not deallocate its vt upon
Don Armstrong d...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
Ok. For some reason, I hadn't originally noticed that this was
concerning an OOT module which Debian itself didn't actually
distribute. [Julien: I'm correct in that, right?] But that's probably
fine.
You are correct.
Julien: Are you currently
On Thu, 2010-12-30 at 16:02 +0100, Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
A new crash on that machine, after upgrading kernel, is shown here:
Dec 29 22:21:28 atf-124 kernel: [49041.588528] [ cut here
]
Dec 29 22:21:28 atf-124 kernel: [49041.591269] kernel BUG at
Hi Ian,
thanks for working on this report.
Il giorno mar, 04/01/2011 alle 11.53 +, Ian Campbell ha scritto:
On Thu, 2010-12-30 at 16:02 +0100, Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
A new crash on that machine, after upgrading kernel, is shown here:
Dec 29 22:21:28 atf-124 kernel: [49041.588528]
Hi Ian,
Il giorno mar, 04/01/2011 alle 11.53 +, Ian Campbell ha scritto:
On Thu, 2010-12-30 at 16:02 +0100, Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
[...]
I would expect some log on the hypervisor console (xm dmesg) which
corresponds with this hypercall failure, which would be very useful to
see..
I just
On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 14:48 +0100, Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
Hi Ian,
Il giorno mar, 04/01/2011 alle 11.53 +, Ian Campbell ha scritto:
On Thu, 2010-12-30 at 16:02 +0100, Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
[...]
I would expect some log on the hypervisor console (xm dmesg) which
corresponds with this
On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 09:59 +0100, Rik Theys wrote:
Hi,
On 12/22/2010 10:34 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
I was wondering about clamping something in the kernel to correspond to
CONFIG_XEN_MAX_DOMAIN_MEMORY and avoid the issue but you say the crash
is after x VCPUS and before Scrubbing Free
On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 14:08 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
Now I think of it can you also collect a similar log with the dom0_mem
workaround in place, for comparisons sake.
Are you able to rebuild the kernel with
CONFIG_XEN_MAX_DOMAIN_MEMORY=128? If so then a log of that boot for
comparison would
Hi Ian,
I've tried with 2.6.32-28 but problem persists. So we have a problem
with symptoms similar to #596802. I'll attach the oops details.
Regards,
Stephan
Jan 4 17:46:33 n0020 kernel: [ 82.100424] device vif1.0 entered promiscuous
mode
Jan 4 17:46:33 n0020 kernel: [ 82.103545] br0:
Hi,
No, unfortunately not. I just suffered it again aswell over the
Christmas break. Let me know if you find any fix.
Regards,
Mark
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 12:50:26PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 12:05:18PM +0100, Mark Adams wrote:
As this is when the clock
In addition, I received the below from James Song but when I queried
what it changed he did not respond, so I haven't tried it..
added timer_mode =2 and tsc_mode = 1 and viridian=1 into your
configure file.
On Tue, Jan
On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 17:54 +0100, Stephan Austermühle wrote:
Hi Ian,
I've tried with 2.6.32-28 but problem persists. So we have a problem
with symptoms similar to #596802. I'll attach the oops details.
Thanks.
I don't suppose you feel inclined to bisect between -23 and -28 to find
the
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 08:30:27AM +0100, Martin Gerdes wrote:
Installing initramfs-tools version 0.98.7 on squeeze (=debian testing) I get
the following error messages:
/usr/sbin/mkinitramfs: 296:
/tmp/mkinitramfs_6qmV4K/scripts/init-top/all_generic_ide: Permission denied
Iann
Now I think of it can you also collect a similar log with the dom0_mem
workaround in place, for comparisons sake.
Are you able to rebuild the kernel with
CONFIG_XEN_MAX_DOMAIN_MEMORY=128? If so then a log of that boot for
comparison would be very interesting.
If you don't know how
Hello,
Am 04.01.2011 18:33, schrieb Ian Campbell:
I don't suppose you feel inclined to bisect between -23 and -28 to find
the first broken version, do you? (http://snapshot.debian.org/ is your
friend here)
I've checked...
-23: oops
-24: oops
-25: oops
-26: oops
-27: oops
-28: oops
-29: oops
On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 21:44 +0100, Stephan Austermühle wrote:
So the problem was already present in -23 and it just seems to have the
same symptoms like #596802.
OK, thanks for testing that.
I wonder if you could play with ethtool to enable/disable various
features on the physical NIC. In
package linux-2.6
retitle 608858 copying large file with smbd on raid causes BUG at
fs/jbd/transaction.c:1156
thanks
[resending via smtp.academica.fi since smtp.netsonic.fi does not seem
to be delivering my emails any time soon...]
Gregg gkn...@tampabay.rr.com writes:
[1393760.788377] EXT3-fs
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
package linux-2.6
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'linux-2.6'
Limit currently set to 'package':'linux-2.6'
retitle 608858 copying large file with smbd on raid causes BUG at
fs/jbd/transaction.c:1156
Bug #608858
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 12:28:22PM +0100, Julien BLACHE wrote:
Don Armstrong d...@debian.org wrote:
[...]
worked around by using DKMS or similar with prebuilt binaries and
requiring exact kernel version dependencies?
DKMS is useless if the ABI number doesn't change, in its current
form.
On Tue, 04 Jan 2011, Julien BLACHE wrote:
Don Armstrong d...@debian.org wrote:
Julien: Are you currently shipping a kernel in production which
would be affected by this change if we don't change the ABI
number? Or does this only affect cases where you are testing
squeeze? Could it be
I
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 10:08:32PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 21:44 +0100, Stephan Austermühle wrote:
So the problem was already present in -23 and it just seems to have the
same symptoms like #596802.
OK, thanks for testing that.
I wonder if you could play with
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk writes:
Do pay attention. We were discussing the implications of changing our
current practice of trying to avoid ABI bumps during freeze and stable
updates. We would then probably change the uname release (the ABI
identifier) in each version of the
On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 17:23 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk writes:
Do pay attention. We were discussing the implications of changing our
current practice of trying to avoid ABI bumps during freeze and stable
updates. We would then probably change the uname
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk writes:
On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 17:23 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
With hundreds of servers, we'd rather not install compilers and DKMS on
every one of them, and with lots of machines, the loss of
reproducibility from separately compiling the modules on every
On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 17:55 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk writes:
On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 17:23 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
With hundreds of servers, we'd rather not install compilers and DKMS on
every one of them, and with lots of machines, the loss of
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk writes:
DKMS does build real Debian packages. And that means that OOT module
sources do not need to be packaged differently depending on where the
modules will be built.
Oh, huh, I hadn't noticed that. Thanks for the pointer! I'll have to
play with that;
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
tags 596390 + pending
Bug #596390 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-bpo.5-amd64: r8169 Link not ready
Added tag(s) pending.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please
I have not experienced a single bit of trouble until upgrading to this
kernel. I will try writing a large file to other file systems as well, but I
do know that I can write smaller, 1-300mb, files to other file systems
without an issue.
Yes I'm using aacraid. I'm using an Adaptec 2820 card with 4
After forcefully rebooting I have removed VMware from running at boot and will
test again. I wanted to make sure nothing was left loaded after just removing
the modules. I'm quite experienced in Windows, but don't know the in's and
out's of Linux to the extent that I do of Windows.
Name:
Address:
Occupation:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
tags 607863 + pending
Bug #607863 [linux-base] linux-base postinst fails to update UUIDs in
/boot/boot/grub
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #607863 to the same tags
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
tags 608185 + pending
Bug #608185 [linux-2.6] btrfs-tools: balance tree action should be only
triggered by root
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #608185 to the same
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
tags 596390 + pending
Bug #596390 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-bpo.5-amd64: r8169 Link not ready
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #596390 to the same tags
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
tags 608138 + pending
Bug #608138 [linux-2.6] Annoying warning NMI watchdog failed to create perf
event on cpu0
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #608138 to the same
Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in
the Debian upload queue directory:
linux-2.6_2.6.37-1~experimental.1.dsc
This looks like an upload, but a .changes file is missing, so the job
cannot be processed.
If no .changes file arrives within 23:12:45, the files will be deleted.
46 matches
Mail list logo
