Hi Jonathan,
Mike Hore wrote:
Hi Jonathan,
That is bug #636040 (finish-install: hvc0 console added to inittab
even when not available), which seems to be mostly harmless. It
should be safe to remove the co: line to remove the message about
spawning getty there.
Are you suggesting I do
Hi,
first of all sorry for the delay. I have been out for a few days and I don't
see this email.
A Dijous, 11 d'agost de 2011, Jonathan Nieder va escriure:
[...]
That's it. Does it sound reasonable to you?
Yes, it's so reasonable. I hope write it soon I send it. Thanks a lot for the
@xen-devel:
Does this look familiar to anyone, this is (I expect, hopefully Giuseppe
will confirm) from Debian Squeeze which has a Xen 4.0.x with a PVops
dom0 kernel based on xen.git from last summer (e73f4955a821) with more
recent upstream longterm kernels (up to and including 2.6.32.41) merged
Il giorno lun, 22/08/2011 alle 10.00 +0100, Ian Campbell ha scritto:
[...]
@Giuseppe:
Can you confirm the versions of the xen and qemu-dm packages which you
have got installed please.
$ COLUMNS=120 dpkg -l \*linux-image\* \*qemu-\* | grep ^ii
ii linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen 2.6.32-35
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 06:42:13PM -0500, Troy Davis wrote:
-A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.0.64/26 -o eth1 -m multiport -p udp --dport
53,123 -j MASQUERADE
-A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.0.64/26 -o eth1 -m multiport -p tcp --dport
22,80,119,443 -j MASQUERADE
This config allows packets with private
Hi!
I would also like to add my +1 vote to enable this option on all
architectures.
I can also confirm, that loading this driver no longer redirects console
output to the DisplayLink adapter right away. Instead, it is now an
option, which is disabled by default. From
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 638855 src:linux-2.6
Bug #638855 [linux-image-2.6.39-bpo.2-686-pae]
linux-image-2.6.39-bpo.2-686-pae: kernel BUG at md.c:6630! on reboot -f
Warning: Unknown package 'linux-image-2.6.39-bpo.2-686-pae'
Bug reassigned from package
On Saturday 20 August 2011, Ben Hutchings wrote:
This wouldn't entirely surprise me on a 32-bit kernel with 1000 Hz
timer, but we don't build any kernel packages with that configuration.
Which kernel did you actually find this on?
32 s uname -a
Linux solstice2 2.6.32-5-amd64 #1 SMP Tue Jun
-A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.0.64/26 -o eth1 -m multiport -p udp --dport 53,123
-j MASQUERADE
-A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.0.64/26 -o eth1 -m multiport -p tcp --dport
22,80,119,443 -j MASQUERADE
This config allows packets with private addresses to escape to eth1. Fix it.
Granted. However,
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 3.0.0-1
Severity: minor
Each time I start up my laptop, the following errors (warnings?) appear:
[5.083819] shpchp :00:01.0: Cannot reserve MMIO region
[5.447322] SP5100 TCO timer: mmio address 0xfec000f0 already in use
The system is working fine as far
David, I think we need this in 3.0-stable:
commit 797fd3913abf2f7036003ab8d3d019cbea41affd
Author: Julian Anastasov j...@ssi.bg
Date: Sun Aug 7 09:11:00 2011 +
netfilter: TCP and raw fix for ip_route_me_harder
(Discussed in https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39132 and
Package: linux-libc-dev
Version: 3.0.0-2
Severity: important
Last update seems to break compiling some Haiku build tools which currently
require -m32. Build log below.
cf. https://www.haiku-os.org/guides/building
$ (cd generated-x86-gcc4/; jam -q haiku-vmware-image)
patience...
Hi,
Roberto Dal Zilio roberto.dalzi...@ilvillage.it writes:
[904313.840676] updatedb.mloc D 880001855c40 0 14983 14979
0x
[904313.840684] 880001855c40 0282 000800017880
8800032f5810
[904313.840693] f9e0
On 2011-08-22 17:07 +0200, François Revol wrote:
Package: linux-libc-dev
Version: 3.0.0-2
Severity: important
Last update seems to break compiling some Haiku build tools which currently
require -m32. Build log below.
cf. https://www.haiku-os.org/guides/building
$ (cd
Le 22/08/2011 17:48, Sven Joachim a écrit :
On 2011-08-22 17:07 +0200, François Revol wrote:
Package: linux-libc-dev
Version: 3.0.0-2
Severity: important
Last update seems to break compiling some Haiku build tools which currently
require -m32. Build log below.
I bet /usr/include/asm is an
reassign 638867 gcc-multilib
forcemerge 638418 638867
thanks
On 2011-08-22 17:55 +0200, François Revol wrote:
Le 22/08/2011 17:48, Sven Joachim a écrit :
On 2011-08-22 17:07 +0200, François Revol wrote:
Package: linux-libc-dev
Version: 3.0.0-2
Severity: important
Last update seems to
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 638867 gcc-multilib
Bug #638867 [linux-libc-dev] linux-libc-dev: errno.h includes non-existent
asm/errno.h for -m32
Bug reassigned from package 'linux-libc-dev' to 'gcc-multilib'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions
Hi Ralf,
Ralf Jung wrote:
Each time I start up my laptop, the following errors (warnings?) appear:
[5.083819] shpchp :00:01.0: Cannot reserve MMIO region
[5.447322] SP5100 TCO timer: mmio address 0xfec000f0 already in use
The system is working fine as far as I can tell.
Hi,
Let's deal with the first one. It seems like a real problem because
it distracts people debugging other problems. The second should be
filed as a separate bug if you are interested in working on it.
[snip]
The test has been that way ever since v2.6.15-rc1~731^2~22^2~13
(shpchp:
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 3.0.0-2
Severity: wishlist
Would it be possible to report Debian kernel version in uname output? Maybe it
can be added to kernel version string, uname -v (now it's #1 SMP Wed Aug 17
05:07:22 UTC 2011.
This information is present in /proc/version and could be in uname
I am running into a similar isue with 2.6.39.2. amd64.
Intel DH55TC with a Pentium G6950.
I was running a Debian Squeeze with 2.6.38.2 from backports. Was running
fine.
I decided to install 2.6.39.2 from backports (apt-get install ...)
It removed the old kernel and installed the new one.
I
reassign 638878 coreutils 8.5-1
quit
Hi Touko,
Touko Korpela wrote:
Would it be possible to report Debian kernel version in uname
output? Maybe it can be added to kernel version string, uname -v
(now it's #1 SMP Wed Aug 17 05:07:22 UTC 2011.
This information is present in /proc/version and
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 638878 coreutils 8.5-1
Bug #638878 [linux-2.6] linux-image-3.0.0-1-amd64: Maybe report Debian kernel
version with uname
Bug reassigned from package 'linux-2.6' to 'coreutils'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions 3.0.0-2.
Bug
Hi Valentin,
Valentijn Scholten wrote:
[Subject: Bug#636123: similar issue with 2.6.39.2 from backports]
Please keep in mind that these appear as emails in a crowded inbox, so
the subject line can be a good place to put valuable context.
[...]
I was running a Debian Squeeze with 2.6.38.2
Hi,
Thanks for a quick reply.
Ralf Jung wrote:
Hi,
The test has been that way ever since v2.6.15-rc1~731^2~22^2~13
(shpchp: detect SHPC capability before doing a lot of work,
2006-10-13). The false positive (if it actually is a false positive)
is clearly harmless. If someone wants to
Below is the snippet from term.log
As you can see I carefully ignored the warning about the kernel being removed.
I am used to having the old kernel still available as a boot option in grub.
After this I rebooted and ran into the kernel panic.
Log started: 2011-08-21 22:40:54
(Reading database
Valentijn, this is very important:
please can you keep and make available the initrd that was generated
by initramfs-tools?
the file is going to be /boot/initrd.img-2.6.38-2-{insert_arch_name}
DO NOT attempt to recover the system right away (unless you take a
backup of
Hello Luke,
Thanks for jumping in.
I only have a /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-5-amd64 at the moment.
This is the one probably generated (reinstalled) after I reinstalled Squeeze
on top of the existing problematic install.
There's no initrd img for 2.6.39, there's the kernel image itself however.
Roberto Dal Zilio roberto.dalzi...@ilvillage.it writes:
On the xenserver I do not have a crashdump because the VM does not
crash
Can you delibaretly crash it to obtain such a dump? The stuck processes
would still be visible in the dump.
(I only get the task hang and the error in dmesg on the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 638878 src:linux-2.6 3.0.0-2
Bug #638878 [coreutils] linux-image-3.0.0-1-amd64: Maybe report Debian kernel
version with uname
Bug reassigned from package 'coreutils' to 'src:linux-2.6'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 06:55:12PM +0200, Valentijn Scholten wrote:
I am running into a similar isue with 2.6.39.2. amd64.
Intel DH55TC with a Pentium G6950.
I was running a Debian Squeeze with 2.6.38.2 from backports. Was
running fine.
I decided to install 2.6.39.2 from backports
If the driver is auto-muting when nothing is plugged in, that seems to
be a bug which should be fixed.
Can you provide the information listed under 'Reporting problems' at
http://alsa-project.org/main/index.php/Help_To_Debug_Intel_HDA?
Ben.
OK, I re-enabled the auto-mute feature (so no
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 08:07:24PM +0200, Valentijn Scholten wrote:
Below is the snippet from term.log
As you can see I carefully ignored the warning about the kernel being removed.
I am used to having the old kernel still available as a boot option in grub.
After this I rebooted and ran
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 638659 - moreinfo
Bug #638659 [linux-2.6] [linux-2.6] No sound
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
forwarded 638659 ti...@suse.de
Bug #638659 [linux-2.6] [linux-2.6] No sound
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'ti...@suse.de'.
thanks
Stopping processing
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Valentijn Scholten
valentijnschol...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hello Luke,
Thanks for jumping in.
I only have a /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-5-amd64 at the moment.
This is the one probably generated (reinstalled) after I reinstalled Squeeze
on top of the existing
Ben Hutchings wrote:
Touko Korpela wrote:
Would it be possible to report Debian kernel version in uname
output? Maybe it can be added to kernel version string, uname -v
(now it's #1 SMP Wed Aug 17 05:07:22 UTC 2011.
This information is present in /proc/version and could be in uname too.
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 07:44:35PM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 06:56:16PM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
wrote:
Valentijn, this is very important:
please can you keep
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
l...@lkcl.net wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Valentijn Scholten
valentijnschol...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hello Luke,
Thanks for jumping in.
I only have a /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-5-amd64 at the moment.
This is the one probably
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 06:56:16PM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
Valentijn, this is very important:
please can you keep and make available the initrd that was generated
by initramfs-tools?
[...]
There
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 07:55:28PM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
l...@lkcl.net wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Valentijn Scholten
valentijnschol...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hello Luke,
Thanks for jumping in.
I
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 06:56:16PM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
Valentijn, this is very important:
please can you keep and make available the initrd that was generated
by initramfs-tools?
[...]
There isn't one. That is the problem. I don't believe this has
anything to do with
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 07:55:28PM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
l...@lkcl.net wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Valentijn Scholten
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 01:44:03PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Ben Hutchings wrote:
Touko Korpela wrote:
Would it be possible to report Debian kernel version in uname
output? Maybe it can be added to kernel version string, uname -v
(now it's #1 SMP Wed Aug 17 05:07:22 UTC 2011.
This
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 07:44:35PM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 06:56:16PM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 01:44:03PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Ben Hutchings wrote:
Touko Korpela wrote:
Would it be possible to report Debian kernel version in uname
output? Maybe it can be added to kernel version string, uname -v
(now it's #1 SMP Wed Aug 17 05:07:22 UTC 2011.
This
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 08:10:41PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
I think the problem is that many generic scripts that attempt to
capture the kernel version will not use 'uname -a', 'uname -rv', or
similar. If they were to use /proc/version, that would be sufficient,
but then the uname commands
I opened a new bug report:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=638896
It also questions Luke's questions.
Thanks so far.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Valentijn Scholten
valentijnschol...@hotmail.com wrote:
I opened a new bug report:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=638896
thanks valentijn.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 638896 src:linux-2.6 2.6.39-bpo.2-amd64
Bug #638896 [linux-image-2.6 / linux-image-2.6.39-bpo.2-amd64]
linux-image-2.6.39-bpo.2-amd64 root filesystem not found on boot
Warning: Unknown package 'linux-image-2.6'
Warning: Unknown package
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:27:10AM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
tags 638878 + moreinfo
thanks
Touko Korpela wrote:
Would it be possible to report Debian kernel version in uname
output? Maybe it can be added to kernel version string, uname -v
(now it's #1 SMP Wed Aug 17 05:07:22 UTC 2011.
Ben Hutchings wrote:
I think the problem is that many generic scripts that attempt to
capture the kernel version will not use 'uname -a', 'uname -rv', or
similar. If they were to use /proc/version, that would be sufficient,
but then the uname commands probably work for almost every other
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton l...@lkcl.net (lkcl) reported bug
#636123, which then received a follow-up which is very clearly (to me)
a different bug. He insists on asking the second submitter to
investigate things as if the second bug is the same as his bug, while
I have asked the second
From: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 16:08:00 +0100
David, I think we need this in 3.0-stable:
The change is already in -stable as it went into 3.0-final.
If anything this might suggest that the fix in question is
the cause of this bug, since the commit went in right
After making some backups, I tried to upgrade the kernel again.
Guess what? It just works now.
The term.log section looks nothing like the one above.
Also the old kernel has been retained.
term.log:
Log started: 2011-08-22 22:23:29
(Reading database ... M(Reading database ... 5%M(Reading
After making some backups, I tried to upgrade the kernel again.
Guess what? It just works now.
arghhh! valentijn, that's *exactly* the mistake that i made :)
actually in my case, i installed grub (and lvm2) which triggered off
the postinst initramfs-tools hook.
you cannot back-recover
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:02 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
luke.leigh...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Valentijn Scholten
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2011 10:45 PM
To: 638...@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: linux-image-2.6.39-bpo.2-amd64 root filesystem not found on
boot
Luke,
The installer has
Well, it’s Debian Stable, with the following changes:
Newer kernel from backports (2.6.38 and now 2.6.39)
Newer transmission-daemon from experimental (2.32)
sources.list
#
# deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 6.0.0 _Squeeze_ - Official Snapshot amd64
LIVE/INSTALL Binary 20110324-07:27]/ squeeze
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 01:27:24PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
From: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 16:08:00 +0100
David, I think we need this in 3.0-stable:
The change is already in -stable as it went into 3.0-final.
If anything this might suggest that the
Package: linux-source-3.0.0
Version: 3.0.0-1
Severity: normal
#modproble speedstep-centrino
throws No such device for Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor (thinkpad T42)
diff my-speedstep-centrino.c speedstep-centrino.c:
c
46d45
CPU_DOTHAN_C0,
55,57c54,55
[CPU_DOTHAN_B0] = { 6, 13,
From: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 22:44:14 +0100
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 01:27:24PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
From: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 16:08:00 +0100
David, I think we need this in 3.0-stable:
The change is already in
please check the attach files
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 08:48:24PM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
valentijn, hi,
Your messages don't reach valentijn if you only send mail to bugnumber
address...people aren't automatically subscribed to bugs.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
Does acpi-cpufreq not work for this system?
If you want to propose a patch to the speedstep-centrino driver,
following the instructions in Documentation/SubmittingPatches.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
We get into the habit of living before acquiring the habit of thinking.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 638913 + moreinfo
Bug #638913 [linux-source-3.0.0] linux-source-3.0.0: cpu frequency
speedstep_centrino Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
Does acpi-cpufreq not work for this system?
no, it does not work:
# modprobe acpi-cpufreq
FATAL: Error inserting acpi_cpufreq
(/lib/modules/3.0.0-speedstep/kernel/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.ko): No
such device
If you want to propose a patch to the speedstep-centrino driver,
following the
from Grzegorz Kochański
Additional settings for thinkpads Intel M Processors.
Signed-off-by: Grzegorz Kochański rumi_deb...@o2.pl
---
--- linux-source-3.0.0/drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-centrino.c.orig
2011-08-23
00:42:04.591009201 +0200
+++
Package: firmware-netxen
Version: 0.28
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
The HP NC375i network card on an HP ML370 G6 server with Debian squeeze OS
installed as problems.
The server is connected to a switch that does only 100/full and it fails to
autonegotiate correctly
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:47:24PM +0200, Valentijn Scholten wrote:
After making some backups, I tried to upgrade the kernel again.
Guess what? It just works now.
The term.log section looks nothing like the one above.
Also the old kernel has been retained.
Please use reply fuction when
Hi,
Grzegorz Kochański wrote:
Additional settings for thinkpads Intel M Processors.
It is best to credit the original author and mention where the patch
came from. IIUC this patch is by Christophe Dumez and can be found
at
Mike Hore wrote:
I added single and removed quiet. The boot then proceeded till I got a
flashing line at the top of the screen saying
lp: driver loaded but no devices found
alternating very rapidly with another line I couldn't read. No further
progress.
Maybe scroll lock can stop it.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 638921 src:linux-2.6 2.6.32-35
Bug #638921 [firmware-netxen] firmware-netxen: HP NC375i network card fails to
autonegotiate with a 100full cisco switch
Bug reassigned from package 'firmware-netxen' to 'src:linux-2.6'.
Bug No longer
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 638921 firmware-netxen 0.28
Bug #638921 [src:linux-2.6] firmware-netxen: HP NC375i network card fails to
autonegotiate with a 100full cisco switch
Bug reassigned from package 'src:linux-2.6' to 'firmware-netxen'.
Bug No longer marked as
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 06:53:44PM -0400, Michael Mastrogiacomo wrote:
Package: firmware-netxen
Version: 0.28
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
The HP NC375i network card on an HP ML370 G6 server with Debian
squeeze OS installed as problems.
The server is connected
Package: firmware-iwlwifi
Version: 0.33
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
I've found a similar error (practically the same I think) with my intel
iwl3945 a/b/g wifi card on Sid. It doesn't stop working correctly all the times
it happens, only a few of them (possibly, 1 of each
I notice that bug #636123 is currently assigned to src:linux-2.6,
although it may be a bug in initramfs-tools. In any case, both packages
are maintained by the kernel team.
Ben.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi all, I'm getting kernel panic on XFS write process by random. Could
someone point to me if this is a known issue and if there's a fix for it?
Attach is the log for it.
[922371.445221] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at
000389b14ad8
[922371.445730] IP: [81557980]
On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 09:59 +0800, Muhammad Hallaj Subery wrote:
Hi all, I'm getting kernel panic on XFS write process by random. Could
someone point to me if this is a known issue and if there's a fix for
it? Attach is the log for it.
Try reporting this to kernel-t...@lists.ubuntu.com or on
Hi Jonathan,
Mike Hore wrote:
I added single and removed quiet. The boot then proceeded till I got a
flashing line at the top of the screen saying
lp: driver loaded but no devices found
alternating very rapidly with another line I couldn't read. No further
progress.
Maybe scroll lock
Mike Hore wrote:
Ummm... Mac keyboards don't have scroll lock!
It seems that scroll lock is shift+f14.
Yes, single WAS there!! Let me double-check...
yes, what I said was what happened. Both single and quiet were there. The
actual line printed was
Starting GNOME Display Manager: gdm3
On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 00:38 +0200, Grzegorz Kochański wrote:
Does acpi-cpufreq not work for this system?
no, it does not work:
# modprobe acpi-cpufreq
FATAL: Error inserting acpi_cpufreq
(/lib/modules/3.0.0-speedstep/kernel/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.ko):
No such device
It works on my
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 638878 src:linux-2.6 3.0.0-2
Bug #638878 [src:linux-2.6] linux-image-3.0.0-1-amd64: Maybe report Debian
kernel version with uname
Ignoring request to reassign bug #638878 to the same package
Bug #638878 [src:linux-2.6]
On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 14:54 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Ben Hutchings wrote:
I think the problem is that many generic scripts that attempt to
capture the kernel version will not use 'uname -a', 'uname -rv', or
similar. If they were to use /proc/version, that would be sufficient,
but
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 638878 + patch
Bug #638878 [src:linux-2.6] linux-image-3.0.0-1-amd64: Maybe report Debian
kernel version with uname
Added tag(s) patch.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
638878:
Based on this new log, it looks like you had dracut installed, and
dracut doesn't rebuild the initramfs correctly when you upgrade the
kernel.
I'll reassign this to dracut. I suggest that you upgrade
initramfs-tools and remove dracut for now.
Ben.
signature.asc
Description: This is a
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 638896 dracut
Bug #638896 [src:linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.39-bpo.2-amd64 root filesystem not
found on boot
Bug reassigned from package 'src:linux-2.6' to 'dracut'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions linux-2.6/2.6.39-bpo.2-amd64.
85 matches
Mail list logo
